Do not set prms_id/bug_id anymore.
[deliverable/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / testsuite / gdb.base / structs.exp
CommitLineData
e53890ae
AC
1# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
2
4c38e0a4 3# Copyright 1996, 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
9b254dd1 4# Free Software Foundation, Inc.
74cf1395
JM
5
6# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
7# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
e22f8b7c 8# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
74cf1395 9# (at your option) any later version.
e22f8b7c 10#
74cf1395
JM
11# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
12# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
13# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
14# GNU General Public License for more details.
e22f8b7c 15#
74cf1395 16# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
e22f8b7c 17# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
74cf1395 18
74cf1395
JM
19if $tracelevel then {
20 strace $tracelevel
21}
22
74cf1395 23
e53890ae
AC
24# Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this
25# test.
26
27if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {
28 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
29 fail "This target can not call functions"
30 continue
31}
32
74cf1395
JM
33set testfile "structs"
34set srcfile ${testfile}.c
35set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
36
8b7dbdc9
JK
37# Regex matching any value of `char' type like: a = 65 'A'
38set anychar_re {-?[0-9]{1,3} '(.|\\([0-7]{3}|[a-z]|\\|'))'}
39
e53890ae
AC
40# Create and source the file that provides information about the
41# compiler used to compile the test case.
853d6e5b 42
b4967060
AC
43if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
44 return -1;
853d6e5b
AC
45}
46
e53890ae
AC
47# Compile a variant of structs.c using TYPES to specify the type of
48# the first N struct elements (the remaining elements take the type of
49# the last TYPES field). Run the compmiled program up to "main".
50# Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build.
853d6e5b 51
8b7dbdc9 52set first 1
e53890ae
AC
53proc start_structs_test { types } {
54 global testfile
55 global srcfile
56 global binfile
57 global objdir
58 global subdir
59 global srcdir
60 global gdb_prompt
8b7dbdc9
JK
61 global anychar_re
62 global first
e53890ae
AC
63
64 # Create the additional flags
65 set flags "debug"
66 set testfile "structs"
67 set n 0
68 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
69 set m [I2A ${n}]
70 set t [lindex ${types} $n]
71 lappend flags "additional_flags=-Dt${m}=${t}"
72 append testfile "-" "$t"
73 }
74
75 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
76 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags}"] != "" } {
77 # built the second test case since we can't use prototypes
78 warning "Prototypes not supported, rebuilding with -DNO_PROTOTYPES"
79 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags} additional_flags=-DNO_PROTOTYPES"] != "" } {
b60f0898
JB
80 untested structs.exp
81 return -1
e53890ae
AC
82 }
83 }
84
85 # Start with a fresh gdb.
e42c7771 86 gdb_exit
e53890ae
AC
87 gdb_start
88 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
89 gdb_load ${binfile}
90
91 # Make certain that the output is consistent
92 gdb_test "set print sevenbit-strings" "" \
93 "set print sevenbit-strings; ${testfile}"
94 gdb_test "set print address off" "" \
95 "set print address off; ${testfile}"
96 gdb_test "set width 0" "" \
97 "set width 0; ${testfile}"
8b7dbdc9
JK
98 gdb_test "set print elements 300" "" \
99 "set print elements 300; ${testfile}"
e53890ae
AC
100
101 # Advance to main
102 if { ![runto_main] } then {
103 gdb_suppress_tests;
104 }
b729099e
MC
105
106 # Get the debug format
107 get_debug_format
e53890ae 108
8b7dbdc9
JK
109 # Limit the slow $anychar_re{256} matching for better performance.
110 if $first {
111 set first 0
112
113 # Verify $anychar_re can match all the values of `char' type.
114 gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "chartest-done"]
115 gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "chartest-done" ".*chartest-done.*"
116 gdb_test "p chartest" "= {({c = ${anychar_re}}, ){255}{c = ${anychar_re}}}"
117 }
118
e53890ae
AC
119 # check that at the struct containing all the relevant types is correct
120 set foo_t "type = struct struct[llength ${types}] \{"
121 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
122 append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+[lindex ${types} $n] [i2a $n];"
123 }
124 append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+\}"
125 gdb_test "ptype foo[llength ${types}]" "${foo_t}" \
126 "ptype foo[llength ${types}]; ${testfile}"
74cf1395
JM
127}
128
e53890ae
AC
129# The expected value for fun${n}, L${n} and foo${n}. First element is
130# empty to make indexing easier. "foo" returns the modified value,
131# "zed" returns the invalid value.
853d6e5b 132
e53890ae
AC
133proc foo { n } {
134 return [lindex {
135 "{}"
136 "{a = 49 '1'}"
137 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2'}"
138 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3'}"
139 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4'}"
140 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5'}"
141 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6'}"
142 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7'}"
143 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8'}"
144 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9'}"
145 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A'}"
146 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B'}"
147 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C'}"
148 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D'}"
149 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E'}"
150 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F'}"
151 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E', o = 111 'o', p = 71 'G'}"
152 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F', p = 112 'p', q = 72 'H'}"
153 } $n]
154}
155
156proc zed { n } {
157 return [lindex {
158 "{}"
159 "{a = 90 'Z'}"
160 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z'}"
161 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z'}"
162 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z'}"
163 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z'}"
164 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z'}"
165 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z'}"
166 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z'}"
167 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z'}"
168 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z'}"
169 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z'}"
170 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z'}"
171 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z'}"
172 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z'}"
173 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z'}"
174 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z'}"
175 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z', q = 90 'Z'}"
176 } $n]
177}
178
987a9106 179proc any { n } {
8b7dbdc9
JK
180 global anychar_re
181 set ac $anychar_re
182 return [lindex [list \
183 "{}" \
184 "{a = ${ac}}" \
185 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}}" \
186 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}}" \
187 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}}" \
188 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}}" \
189 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}}" \
190 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}}" \
191 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}}" \
192 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}}" \
193 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}}" \
194 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}}" \
195 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}}" \
196 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}}" \
197 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}}" \
198 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}}" \
199 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}, p = ${ac}}" \
200 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}, p = ${ac}, q = ${ac}}" \
201 ] $n]
987a9106
JB
202}
203
e53890ae
AC
204# Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower
205# or upper case. This is ment to be i18n proof.
206
207proc i2a { n } {
208 return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n]
209}
210
211proc I2A { n } {
212 return [string toupper [i2a $n]]
213}
214
215
216# Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
217
218proc setup_kfails { file tuples bug } {
219 global testfile
220 if [string match $file $testfile] {
221 foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
853d6e5b 222 }
74cf1395
JM
223}
224
e53890ae
AC
225proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
226 global testfile
227 if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler] && [test_debug_format $format]} {
228 foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
229 }
230}
231
232# Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions
233# returning (or passing in a single structs.
234
235# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
236# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
237# this test.
853d6e5b 238
e53890ae
AC
239# start_structs_test() will have previously built a program with a
240# specified combination of types for those elements. To ensure
241# robustness of the output, "p/c" is used.
242
243# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and
244# "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c".
245
246proc test_struct_calls { n } {
247 global testfile
b4967060 248 global gdb_prompt
853d6e5b 249
e53890ae
AC
250 # Check that GDB can always extract a struct-return value from an
251 # inferior function call. Since GDB always knows the location of an
252 # inferior function call's return value these should never fail
253
254 # Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun$N" and then
255 # examining the return value printed by GDB.
853d6e5b 256
e53890ae 257 set tests "call $n ${testfile}"
853d6e5b 258
e53890ae 259 # Call fun${n}, checking the printed return-value.
338e05af
AC
260 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
261 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
e53890ae 262 gdb_test "p/c fun${n}()" "[foo ${n}]" "p/c fun<n>(); ${tests}"
853d6e5b 263
e53890ae
AC
264 # Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function.
265 # This test can never fail.
266
267 # Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun$N" which
268 # stores its parameter in the global variable "L$N". GDB then
269 # examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected.
270
271 gdb_test "call Fun${n}(foo${n})" "" "call Fun<n>(foo<n>); ${tests}"
338e05af
AC
272 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
273 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
e53890ae 274 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" [foo ${n}] "p/c L<n>; ${tests}"
b4967060 275}
853d6e5b 276
e53890ae
AC
277# Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or
278# "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding
279# return-value.
280
281# Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return
282# values. There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in
283# memory. For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a
284# failure is "expected". However GDB must still both return the
285# function and display the final source and line information.
286
287# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
288# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
289# this test.
290
291# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract
292# return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers".
293# Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the
294# return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location). The test
295# is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two
296# are consistent. GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the
297# other.
298
299proc test_struct_returns { n } {
300 global gdb_prompt
301 global testfile
302
303 set tests "return $n ${testfile}"
304
305
306 # Check that "return" works.
307
308 # GDB must always force the return of a function that has
309 # a struct result. Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be
310 # possible to store the return value in a register.
311
312 # The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()". The test forces
313 # "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value. Since that code
314 # snippet will store the the returned value in "L{n}" the return
315 # is tested by examining "L{n}". This assumes that the
316 # compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when
317 # the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged. Also check for
318 # consistency between this and the "finish" case.
319
320 # Get into a call of fun${n}
321 gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
322 "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
323 "advance to fun<n> for return; ${tests}"
324
325 # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
1bfbbb9d 326 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for return; ${tests}"
e53890ae
AC
327
328 # Force the "return". This checks that the return is always
329 # performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user.
330 # GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't
331 # known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced
332 # the frame ("No frame").
333
334 # The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the
335 # entire operation. The value returned is checked further down.
b5c0bfa2
AC
336 # "return_value_known", if non-zero, indicates that GDB knew where
337 # the return value was located.
e53890ae 338
e53890ae 339 set test "return foo<n>; ${tests}"
b5c0bfa2 340 set return_value_known 1
5266b69c 341 set return_value_unimplemented 0
d422fe19 342 gdb_test_multiple "return foo${n}" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
343 -re "The location" {
344 # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
b5c0bfa2 345 set return_value_known 0
e53890ae
AC
346 exp_continue
347 }
348 -re "A structure or union" {
349 # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
b5c0bfa2 350 set return_value_known 0
5266b69c
AC
351 # Double ulgh. Architecture doesn't use return_value and
352 # hence hasn't implemented small structure return.
353 set return_value_unimplemented 1
e53890ae
AC
354 exp_continue
355 }
356 -re "Make fun${n} return now.*y or n. $" {
d422fe19 357 gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
358 -re "L${n} *= fun${n}.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
359 # Need to step off the function call
360 gdb_test "next" "L.* *= fun.*" "${test}"
361 }
362 -re "L[expr ${n} + 1] *= fun[expr ${n} + 1].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
363 pass "${test}"
364 }
e53890ae
AC
365 }
366 }
e53890ae
AC
367 }
368
369 # Check that the return-value is as expected. At this stage we're
370 # just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with
b5c0bfa2 371 # "return_value_known" set above.
987a9106
JB
372 #
373 # Note that, when return_value_known is false, we can't make any
374 # assumptions at all about the value L<n>:
375 #
376 # - If the caller passed the address of L<n> directly as fun<n>'s
377 # return value buffer, then L<n> will be unchanged, because we
378 # forced fun<n> to return before it could store anything in it.
379 #
380 # - If the caller passed the address of some temporary buffer to
381 # fun<n>, and then copied the buffer into L<n>, then L<n> will
382 # have been overwritten with whatever garbage was in the
383 # uninitialized buffer.
384 #
385 # - However, if the temporary buffer just happened to have the
386 # "right" value of foo<n> in it, then L<n> will, in fact, have
387 # the value you'd expect to see if the 'return' had worked!
388 # This has actually been observed to happen on the Renesas M32C.
389 #
390 # So, really, anything is acceptable unless return_value_known is
391 # true.
e53890ae 392
e53890ae 393 set test "value foo<n> returned; ${tests}"
d422fe19 394 gdb_test_multiple "p/c L${n}" "${test}" {
e53890ae 395 -re " = [foo ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
987a9106
JB
396 # This answer is okay regardless of whether GDB claims to
397 # have set the return value: if it did, then this is what
398 # we expected; and if it didn't, then any answer is okay.
399 pass "${test}"
e53890ae 400 }
987a9106 401 -re " = [any $n].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
b5c0bfa2
AC
402 if $return_value_known {
403 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew
987a9106 404 # the location of the return value.
b5c0bfa2
AC
405 fail "${test}"
406 } else {
987a9106
JB
407 # We expected L${n} to be set to garbage, so any
408 # answer is acceptable.
e53890ae 409 pass "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
410 }
411 }
5266b69c
AC
412 -re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" {
413 if $return_value_unimplemented {
414 # What a suprize. The architecture hasn't implemented
415 # return_value, and hence has to fail.
416 kfail "$test" gdb/1444
417 } else {
418 fail "$test"
419 }
420 }
e53890ae
AC
421 }
422
423 # Check that a "finish" works.
424
425 # This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs".
426 # Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths.
427
428 # The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()". The program is
429 # advanced into a call to "fun{n}" and then that function is
430 # finished. The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using
431 # "p/c", is checked.
432
433 # Get into "fun${n}()".
434 gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
435 "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
436 "advance to fun<n> for finish; ${tests}"
437
438 # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
e53890ae
AC
439 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for finish; ${tests}"
440
b5c0bfa2
AC
441 # Finish the function, set 'finish_value_known" to non-empty if
442 # the return-value was found.
443
6882279b 444 set test "finish foo<n>; ${tests}"
b5c0bfa2 445 set finish_value_known 1
d422fe19 446 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
447 -re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
448 pass "${test}"
449 }
450 -re "Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
451 # Expected bad value. For the moment this is ok.
b5c0bfa2 452 set finish_value_known 0
e53890ae
AC
453 pass "${test}"
454 }
e53890ae
AC
455 }
456
457 # Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust
458 # "p/c". If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous
459 # check that the variable was cleared, is printed.
6882279b 460 set test "value foo<n> finished; ${tests}"
d422fe19 461 gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" {
e53890ae 462 -re "[foo ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
b5c0bfa2
AC
463 if $finish_value_known {
464 pass "${test}"
465 } else {
e53890ae
AC
466 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
467 # know the location of the return-value.
468 fail "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
469 }
470 }
471 -re "[zed ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
472 # The value didn't get found. This is "expected".
b5c0bfa2 473 if $finish_value_known {
e53890ae
AC
474 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB did
475 # know the location of the return-value.
476 fail "${test}"
b5c0bfa2
AC
477 } else {
478 pass "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
479 }
480 }
e53890ae
AC
481 }
482
483 # Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent
484 # behavior.
485
b5c0bfa2
AC
486 # Since "finish" works in more cases than "return" (see
487 # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_RETURNS_ADDRESS and
488 # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_PRESERVES_ADDRESS), the "return" value being
489 # known implies that the "finish" value is known (but not the
490 # reverse).
e53890ae 491
b5c0bfa2
AC
492 set test "return value known implies finish value known; ${tests}"
493 if {$return_value_known && ! $finish_value_known} {
e53890ae 494 kfail gdb/1444 "${test}"
b5c0bfa2
AC
495 } else {
496 pass "${test}"
e53890ae 497 }
b4967060 498}
853d6e5b 499
e53890ae
AC
500# ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things
501# randomly use register and/and structure conventions. Check all
502# possible sized char structs in that range. But only a restricted
503# range of the other types.
504
505# NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized structs in memory.
506
507# d10v is weird. 5/6 byte structs go in memory. 2 or more char
508# structs go in memory. Everything else is in a register!
509
510# Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size. This is what the
511# original "structs" test was doing.
512
513start_structs_test { tc }
514test_struct_calls 1
515test_struct_calls 2
516test_struct_calls 3
517test_struct_calls 4
518test_struct_calls 5
519test_struct_calls 6
520test_struct_calls 7
521test_struct_calls 8
522test_struct_calls 9
523test_struct_calls 10
524test_struct_calls 11
525test_struct_calls 12
526test_struct_calls 13
527test_struct_calls 14
528test_struct_calls 15
529test_struct_calls 16
530test_struct_calls 17
531test_struct_returns 1
532test_struct_returns 2
533test_struct_returns 3
534test_struct_returns 4
535test_struct_returns 5
536test_struct_returns 6
537test_struct_returns 7
538test_struct_returns 8
539
540
541# Let the fun begin.
542
543# Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory,
544# come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct. For
545# "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct
546# returns" test up to that boundary.
547
548# For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in
549# floating point registers, regardless of their size.
550
551# The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1,
552# ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are
553# naturally aligned. Padding being added where needed. Note that
554# these numbers are just approx, the d10v has ti=2, a 64-bit has has
555# tl=8.
556
557# Approx size: 2, 4, ...
558start_structs_test { ts }
559test_struct_calls 1
560test_struct_calls 2
561test_struct_calls 3
562test_struct_calls 4
563test_struct_calls 5
564test_struct_returns 1
565test_struct_returns 2
566test_struct_returns 3
567test_struct_returns 4
568
569# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
570start_structs_test { ti }
571test_struct_calls 1
572test_struct_calls 2
573test_struct_calls 3
574test_struct_returns 1
575test_struct_returns 2
576
577# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
578start_structs_test { tl }
579test_struct_calls 1
580test_struct_calls 2
581test_struct_calls 3
582test_struct_returns 1
583test_struct_returns 2
584
585# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
586start_structs_test { tll }
587test_struct_calls 1
588test_struct_calls 2
589test_struct_returns 1
590
591# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
592start_structs_test { tf }
593test_struct_calls 1
594test_struct_calls 2
595test_struct_calls 3
596test_struct_returns 1
597test_struct_returns 2
598
599# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
600start_structs_test { td }
601test_struct_calls 1
602test_struct_calls 2
603test_struct_returns 1
604
605# Approx size: 16, 32, ...
606start_structs_test { tld }
607test_struct_calls 1
608test_struct_calls 2
609test_struct_returns 1
610
611# Approx size: 2+1=3, 4, ...
612start_structs_test { ts tc }
613test_struct_calls 2
614test_struct_calls 3
615test_struct_calls 4
616test_struct_calls 5
617test_struct_calls 6
618test_struct_calls 7
619test_struct_calls 8
620test_struct_returns 2
621
622# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
623start_structs_test { ti tc }
624test_struct_calls 2
625test_struct_calls 3
626test_struct_calls 4
627test_struct_calls 5
628test_struct_calls 6
629test_struct_returns 2
630
631# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
632start_structs_test { tl tc }
633test_struct_calls 2
634test_struct_calls 3
635test_struct_calls 4
636test_struct_calls 5
637test_struct_calls 6
638test_struct_returns 2
639
640# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
641start_structs_test { tll tc }
642test_struct_calls 2
643
644# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
645start_structs_test { tf tc }
646test_struct_calls 2
647test_struct_calls 3
648test_struct_calls 4
649test_struct_calls 5
650test_struct_calls 6
651test_struct_returns 2
652
653# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
654start_structs_test { td tc }
655test_struct_calls 2
656
657# Approx size: 16+1=17, 18, ...
658start_structs_test { tld tc }
659test_struct_calls 2
660
661# Approx size: (1+1)+2=4, 6, ...
662start_structs_test { tc ts }
663test_struct_calls 2
664test_struct_calls 3
665test_struct_calls 4
666test_struct_calls 5
667test_struct_calls 6
668test_struct_returns 2
669
670# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
671start_structs_test { tc ti }
672test_struct_calls 2
673test_struct_calls 3
674test_struct_calls 4
675test_struct_returns 2
676
677# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
678start_structs_test { tc tl }
679test_struct_calls 2
680test_struct_calls 3
681test_struct_calls 4
682test_struct_returns 2
683
684# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
685start_structs_test { tc tll }
686test_struct_calls 2
687
688# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
689start_structs_test { tc tf }
690test_struct_calls 2
691test_struct_calls 3
692test_struct_calls 4
693
694# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
695start_structs_test { tc td }
696test_struct_calls 2
697
698# Approx size: (1+15)+16=32, 48, ...
699start_structs_test { tc tld }
700test_struct_calls 2
701
702# Some float combinations
703
704# Approx size: 8+4=12, 16, ...
705# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
706start_structs_test { td tf }
707test_struct_calls 2
708test_struct_returns 2
74cf1395 709
e53890ae
AC
710# Approx size: (4+4)+8=16, 32, ...
711# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
712start_structs_test { tf td }
713test_struct_calls 2
714test_struct_returns 2
74cf1395
JM
715
716return 0
This page took 1.019283 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.