projects / deliverable / binutils-gdb.git / blame
| Commit | Line | Data |
|---|---|---|
| e53890ae AC |
1 | # This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger. |
| 2 | ||
| 18b67037 | 3 | # Copyright 1996, 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. |
| 74cf1395 JM |
4 | |
| 5 | # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify | |
| 6 | # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by | |
| 7 | # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or | |
| 8 | # (at your option) any later version. | |
| 9 | # | |
| 10 | # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, | |
| 11 | # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of | |
| 12 | # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the | |
| 13 | # GNU General Public License for more details. | |
| 14 | # | |
| 15 | # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License | |
| 16 | # along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software | |
| 17 | # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. | |
| 18 | ||
| 19 | # Please email any bugs, comments, and/or additions to this file to: | |
| 20 | # bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu | |
| 21 | ||
| 74cf1395 JM |
22 | if $tracelevel then { |
| 23 | strace $tracelevel | |
| 24 | } | |
| 25 | ||
| 26 | set prms_id 0 | |
| 27 | set bug_id 0 | |
| 28 | ||
| e53890ae AC |
29 | # Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this |
| 30 | # test. | |
| 31 | ||
| 32 | if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] { | |
| 33 | setup_xfail "*-*-*" | |
| 34 | fail "This target can not call functions" | |
| 35 | continue | |
| 36 | } | |
| 37 | ||
| 74cf1395 JM |
38 | set testfile "structs" |
| 39 | set srcfile ${testfile}.c | |
| 40 | set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile} | |
| 41 | ||
| e53890ae AC |
42 | # Create and source the file that provides information about the |
| 43 | # compiler used to compile the test case. | |
| 853d6e5b | 44 | |
| b4967060 AC |
45 | if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] { |
| 46 | return -1; | |
| 853d6e5b AC |
47 | } |
| 48 | ||
| e53890ae AC |
49 | # Compile a variant of structs.c using TYPES to specify the type of |
| 50 | # the first N struct elements (the remaining elements take the type of | |
| 51 | # the last TYPES field). Run the compmiled program up to "main". | |
| 52 | # Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build. | |
| 853d6e5b | 53 | |
| e53890ae AC |
54 | proc start_structs_test { types } { |
| 55 | global testfile | |
| 56 | global srcfile | |
| 57 | global binfile | |
| 58 | global objdir | |
| 59 | global subdir | |
| 60 | global srcdir | |
| 61 | global gdb_prompt | |
| 62 | ||
| 63 | # Create the additional flags | |
| 64 | set flags "debug" | |
| 65 | set testfile "structs" | |
| 66 | set n 0 | |
| 67 | for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} { | |
| 68 | set m [I2A ${n}] | |
| 69 | set t [lindex ${types} $n] | |
| 70 | lappend flags "additional_flags=-Dt${m}=${t}" | |
| 71 | append testfile "-" "$t" | |
| 72 | } | |
| 73 | ||
| 74 | set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile} | |
| 75 | if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags}"] != "" } { | |
| 76 | # built the second test case since we can't use prototypes | |
| 77 | warning "Prototypes not supported, rebuilding with -DNO_PROTOTYPES" | |
| 78 | if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags} additional_flags=-DNO_PROTOTYPES"] != "" } { | |
| 79 | gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail." | |
| 80 | } | |
| 81 | } | |
| 82 | ||
| 83 | # Start with a fresh gdb. | |
| e42c7771 | 84 | gdb_exit |
| e53890ae AC |
85 | gdb_start |
| 86 | gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir | |
| 87 | gdb_load ${binfile} | |
| 88 | ||
| 89 | # Make certain that the output is consistent | |
| 90 | gdb_test "set print sevenbit-strings" "" \ | |
| 91 | "set print sevenbit-strings; ${testfile}" | |
| 92 | gdb_test "set print address off" "" \ | |
| 93 | "set print address off; ${testfile}" | |
| 94 | gdb_test "set width 0" "" \ | |
| 95 | "set width 0; ${testfile}" | |
| 96 | ||
| 97 | # Advance to main | |
| 98 | if { ![runto_main] } then { | |
| 99 | gdb_suppress_tests; | |
| 100 | } | |
| b729099e MC |
101 | |
| 102 | # Get the debug format | |
| 103 | get_debug_format | |
| e53890ae AC |
104 | |
| 105 | # check that at the struct containing all the relevant types is correct | |
| 106 | set foo_t "type = struct struct[llength ${types}] \{" | |
| 107 | for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} { | |
| 108 | append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+[lindex ${types} $n] [i2a $n];" | |
| 109 | } | |
| 110 | append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+\}" | |
| 111 | gdb_test "ptype foo[llength ${types}]" "${foo_t}" \ | |
| 112 | "ptype foo[llength ${types}]; ${testfile}" | |
| 74cf1395 JM |
113 | } |
| 114 | ||
| e53890ae AC |
115 | # The expected value for fun${n}, L${n} and foo${n}. First element is |
| 116 | # empty to make indexing easier. "foo" returns the modified value, | |
| 117 | # "zed" returns the invalid value. | |
| 853d6e5b | 118 | |
| e53890ae AC |
119 | proc foo { n } { |
| 120 | return [lindex { | |
| 121 | "{}" | |
| 122 | "{a = 49 '1'}" | |
| 123 | "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2'}" | |
| 124 | "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3'}" | |
| 125 | "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4'}" | |
| 126 | "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5'}" | |
| 127 | "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6'}" | |
| 128 | "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7'}" | |
| 129 | "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8'}" | |
| 130 | "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9'}" | |
| 131 | "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A'}" | |
| 132 | "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B'}" | |
| 133 | "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C'}" | |
| 134 | "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D'}" | |
| 135 | "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E'}" | |
| 136 | "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F'}" | |
| 137 | "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E', o = 111 'o', p = 71 'G'}" | |
| 138 | "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F', p = 112 'p', q = 72 'H'}" | |
| 139 | } $n] | |
| 140 | } | |
| 141 | ||
| 142 | proc zed { n } { | |
| 143 | return [lindex { | |
| 144 | "{}" | |
| 145 | "{a = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 146 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 147 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 148 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 149 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 150 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 151 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 152 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 153 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 154 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 155 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 156 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 157 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 158 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 159 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 160 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 161 | "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z', q = 90 'Z'}" | |
| 162 | } $n] | |
| 163 | } | |
| 164 | ||
| 165 | # Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower | |
| 166 | # or upper case. This is ment to be i18n proof. | |
| 167 | ||
| 168 | proc i2a { n } { | |
| 169 | return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n] | |
| 170 | } | |
| 171 | ||
| 172 | proc I2A { n } { | |
| 173 | return [string toupper [i2a $n]] | |
| 174 | } | |
| 175 | ||
| 176 | ||
| 177 | # Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs. | |
| 178 | ||
| 179 | proc setup_kfails { file tuples bug } { | |
| 180 | global testfile | |
| 181 | if [string match $file $testfile] { | |
| 182 | foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug } | |
| 853d6e5b | 183 | } |
| 74cf1395 JM |
184 | } |
| 185 | ||
| e53890ae AC |
186 | proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } { |
| 187 | global testfile | |
| 188 | if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler] && [test_debug_format $format]} { | |
| 189 | foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug } | |
| 190 | } | |
| 191 | } | |
| 192 | ||
| 193 | # Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions | |
| 194 | # returning (or passing in a single structs. | |
| 195 | ||
| 196 | # N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used | |
| 197 | # for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail | |
| 198 | # this test. | |
| 853d6e5b | 199 | |
| e53890ae AC |
200 | # start_structs_test() will have previously built a program with a |
| 201 | # specified combination of types for those elements. To ensure | |
| 202 | # robustness of the output, "p/c" is used. | |
| 203 | ||
| 204 | # This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and | |
| 205 | # "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c". | |
| 206 | ||
| 207 | proc test_struct_calls { n } { | |
| 208 | global testfile | |
| b4967060 | 209 | global gdb_prompt |
| 853d6e5b | 210 | |
| e53890ae AC |
211 | # Check that GDB can always extract a struct-return value from an |
| 212 | # inferior function call. Since GDB always knows the location of an | |
| 213 | # inferior function call's return value these should never fail | |
| 214 | ||
| 215 | # Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun$N" and then | |
| 216 | # examining the return value printed by GDB. | |
| 853d6e5b | 217 | |
| e53890ae | 218 | set tests "call $n ${testfile}" |
| 853d6e5b | 219 | |
| e53890ae | 220 | # Call fun${n}, checking the printed return-value. |
| e8367dc7 | 221 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* i*86-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 18b67037 MK |
222 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* sparc64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 223 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* sparc*-*-solaris2* gdb/1447 | |
| ba6219c8 | 224 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* x86_64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| e8367dc7 | 225 | setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-* gcc-3-3 "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455 |
| e53890ae | 226 | gdb_test "p/c fun${n}()" "[foo ${n}]" "p/c fun<n>(); ${tests}" |
| 853d6e5b | 227 | |
| e53890ae AC |
228 | # Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function. |
| 229 | # This test can never fail. | |
| 230 | ||
| 231 | # Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun$N" which | |
| 232 | # stores its parameter in the global variable "L$N". GDB then | |
| 233 | # examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected. | |
| 234 | ||
| 235 | gdb_test "call Fun${n}(foo${n})" "" "call Fun<n>(foo<n>); ${tests}" | |
| e8367dc7 | 236 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* i*86-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 18b67037 MK |
237 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* sparc64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 238 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* sparc*-*-solaris2* gdb/1447 | |
| ba6219c8 | 239 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* x86_64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| e8367dc7 | 240 | setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-* gcc-3-3 "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455 |
| e53890ae | 241 | gdb_test "p/c L${n}" [foo ${n}] "p/c L<n>; ${tests}" |
| b4967060 | 242 | } |
| 853d6e5b | 243 | |
| e53890ae AC |
244 | # Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or |
| 245 | # "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding | |
| 246 | # return-value. | |
| 247 | ||
| 248 | # Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return | |
| 249 | # values. There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in | |
| 250 | # memory. For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a | |
| 251 | # failure is "expected". However GDB must still both return the | |
| 252 | # function and display the final source and line information. | |
| 253 | ||
| 254 | # N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used | |
| 255 | # for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail | |
| 256 | # this test. | |
| 257 | ||
| 258 | # This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract | |
| 259 | # return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers". | |
| 260 | # Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the | |
| 261 | # return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location). The test | |
| 262 | # is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two | |
| 263 | # are consistent. GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the | |
| 264 | # other. | |
| 265 | ||
| 266 | proc test_struct_returns { n } { | |
| 267 | global gdb_prompt | |
| 268 | global testfile | |
| 269 | ||
| 270 | set tests "return $n ${testfile}" | |
| 271 | ||
| 272 | ||
| 273 | # Check that "return" works. | |
| 274 | ||
| 275 | # GDB must always force the return of a function that has | |
| 276 | # a struct result. Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be | |
| 277 | # possible to store the return value in a register. | |
| 278 | ||
| 279 | # The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()". The test forces | |
| 280 | # "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value. Since that code | |
| 281 | # snippet will store the the returned value in "L{n}" the return | |
| 282 | # is tested by examining "L{n}". This assumes that the | |
| 283 | # compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when | |
| 284 | # the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged. Also check for | |
| 285 | # consistency between this and the "finish" case. | |
| 286 | ||
| 287 | # Get into a call of fun${n} | |
| 288 | gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \ | |
| 289 | "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \ | |
| 290 | "advance to fun<n> for return; ${tests}" | |
| 291 | ||
| 292 | # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global. | |
| e8367dc7 | 293 | setup_kfails structs-tld i*86-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 18b67037 MK |
294 | setup_kfails structs-tld sparc64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 295 | setup_kfails structs-tld sparc*-*-solaris2* gdb/1447 | |
| ba6219c8 | 296 | setup_kfails structs-tld x86_64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 1bfbbb9d | 297 | gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for return; ${tests}" |
| e53890ae AC |
298 | |
| 299 | # Force the "return". This checks that the return is always | |
| 300 | # performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user. | |
| 301 | # GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't | |
| 302 | # known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced | |
| 303 | # the frame ("No frame"). | |
| 304 | ||
| 305 | # The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the | |
| 306 | # entire operation. The value returned is checked further down. | |
| 307 | # "return_value_unknown", if non-empty, records why GDB realised | |
| 308 | # that it didn't know where the return value was. | |
| 309 | ||
| e53890ae AC |
310 | set test "return foo<n>; ${tests}" |
| 311 | set return_value_unknown 0 | |
| 5266b69c | 312 | set return_value_unimplemented 0 |
| d422fe19 | 313 | gdb_test_multiple "return foo${n}" "${test}" { |
| e53890ae AC |
314 | -re "The location" { |
| 315 | # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt). | |
| 316 | set return_value_unknown 1 | |
| 317 | exp_continue | |
| 318 | } | |
| 319 | -re "A structure or union" { | |
| 320 | # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt). | |
| e53890ae | 321 | set return_value_unknown 1 |
| 5266b69c AC |
322 | # Double ulgh. Architecture doesn't use return_value and |
| 323 | # hence hasn't implemented small structure return. | |
| 324 | set return_value_unimplemented 1 | |
| e53890ae AC |
325 | exp_continue |
| 326 | } | |
| 327 | -re "Make fun${n} return now.*y or n. $" { | |
| d422fe19 | 328 | gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" { |
| e53890ae AC |
329 | -re "L${n} *= fun${n}.*${gdb_prompt} $" { |
| 330 | # Need to step off the function call | |
| 331 | gdb_test "next" "L.* *= fun.*" "${test}" | |
| 332 | } | |
| 333 | -re "L[expr ${n} + 1] *= fun[expr ${n} + 1].*${gdb_prompt} $" { | |
| 334 | pass "${test}" | |
| 335 | } | |
| e53890ae AC |
336 | } |
| 337 | } | |
| e53890ae AC |
338 | } |
| 339 | ||
| 340 | # Check that the return-value is as expected. At this stage we're | |
| 341 | # just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with | |
| 342 | # "return_value_unknown" set above. | |
| 343 | ||
| e53890ae | 344 | set test "value foo<n> returned; ${tests}" |
| e8367dc7 | 345 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* i*86-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 18b67037 MK |
346 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* sparc64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 347 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* sparc*-*-solaris2* gdb/1447 | |
| ba6219c8 | 348 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* x86_64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| d422fe19 | 349 | gdb_test_multiple "p/c L${n}" "${test}" { |
| e53890ae AC |
350 | -re " = [foo ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" { |
| 351 | if $return_value_unknown { | |
| 352 | # This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't | |
| 353 | # know the location of the return-value. | |
| 354 | fail "${test}" | |
| 355 | } else { | |
| 356 | pass "${test}" | |
| 357 | } | |
| 358 | } | |
| 359 | -re " = [zed ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" { | |
| 360 | if $return_value_unknown { | |
| 361 | # The struct return case. Since any modification | |
| 362 | # would be by reference, and that can't happen, the | |
| 363 | # value should be unmodified and hence Z is expected. | |
| 364 | # Is this a reasonable assumption? | |
| 365 | pass "${test}" | |
| 366 | } else { | |
| 367 | # This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew | |
| 368 | # the location of the return-value. | |
| 369 | fail "${test}" | |
| 370 | } | |
| 371 | } | |
| 5266b69c AC |
372 | -re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" { |
| 373 | if $return_value_unimplemented { | |
| 374 | # What a suprize. The architecture hasn't implemented | |
| 375 | # return_value, and hence has to fail. | |
| 376 | kfail "$test" gdb/1444 | |
| 377 | } else { | |
| 378 | fail "$test" | |
| 379 | } | |
| 380 | } | |
| e53890ae AC |
381 | } |
| 382 | ||
| 383 | # Check that a "finish" works. | |
| 384 | ||
| 385 | # This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs". | |
| 386 | # Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths. | |
| 387 | ||
| 388 | # The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()". The program is | |
| 389 | # advanced into a call to "fun{n}" and then that function is | |
| 390 | # finished. The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using | |
| 391 | # "p/c", is checked. | |
| 392 | ||
| 393 | # Get into "fun${n}()". | |
| 394 | gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \ | |
| 395 | "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \ | |
| 396 | "advance to fun<n> for finish; ${tests}" | |
| 397 | ||
| 398 | # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global. | |
| e8367dc7 | 399 | setup_kfails structs-tld i*86-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 18b67037 MK |
400 | setup_kfails structs-tld sparc64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 401 | setup_kfails structs-tld sparc*-*-solaris2* gdb/1447 | |
| ba6219c8 | 402 | setup_kfails structs-tld x86_64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| e53890ae AC |
403 | gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for finish; ${tests}" |
| 404 | ||
| 405 | # Finish the function, set 'finish_value_unknown" to non-empty if the | |
| 406 | # return-value was not found. | |
| 6882279b | 407 | set test "finish foo<n>; ${tests}" |
| e53890ae | 408 | set finish_value_unknown 0 |
| d422fe19 | 409 | gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" { |
| e53890ae AC |
410 | -re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" { |
| 411 | pass "${test}" | |
| 412 | } | |
| 413 | -re "Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" { | |
| 414 | # Expected bad value. For the moment this is ok. | |
| 415 | set finish_value_unknown 1 | |
| 416 | pass "${test}" | |
| 417 | } | |
| e53890ae AC |
418 | } |
| 419 | ||
| 420 | # Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust | |
| 421 | # "p/c". If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous | |
| 422 | # check that the variable was cleared, is printed. | |
| 6882279b | 423 | set test "value foo<n> finished; ${tests}" |
| e8367dc7 | 424 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* i*86-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 18b67037 MK |
425 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* sparc64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| 426 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* sparc*-*-solaris2* gdb/1447 | |
| ba6219c8 | 427 | setup_kfails structs-*tld* x86_64-*-* gdb/1447 |
| d422fe19 | 428 | gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" { |
| e53890ae AC |
429 | -re "[foo ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" { |
| 430 | if $finish_value_unknown { | |
| 431 | # This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't | |
| 432 | # know the location of the return-value. | |
| 433 | fail "${test}" | |
| 434 | } else { | |
| 435 | pass "${test}" | |
| 436 | } | |
| 437 | } | |
| 438 | -re "[zed ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" { | |
| 439 | # The value didn't get found. This is "expected". | |
| 440 | if $finish_value_unknown { | |
| 441 | pass "${test}" | |
| 442 | } else { | |
| 443 | # This contradicts the above claim that GDB did | |
| 444 | # know the location of the return-value. | |
| 445 | fail "${test}" | |
| 446 | } | |
| 447 | } | |
| e53890ae AC |
448 | } |
| 449 | ||
| 450 | # Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent | |
| 451 | # behavior. | |
| 452 | ||
| 453 | # Since both "return" and "finish" use equivalent "which | |
| 454 | # return-value convention" logic, both commands should have | |
| 455 | # identical can/can-not find return-value messages. | |
| 456 | ||
| 457 | # Note that since "call" and "finish" use common code paths, a | |
| 458 | # failure here is a strong indicator of problems with "store | |
| 459 | # return-value" code paths. Suggest looking at "return_value" | |
| 460 | # when investigating a fix. | |
| 461 | ||
| 462 | set test "return and finish use same convention; ${tests}" | |
| 463 | if {$finish_value_unknown == $return_value_unknown} { | |
| 464 | pass "${test}" | |
| 465 | } else { | |
| 466 | kfail gdb/1444 "${test}" | |
| 467 | } | |
| b4967060 | 468 | } |
| 853d6e5b | 469 | |
| e53890ae AC |
470 | # ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things |
| 471 | # randomly use register and/and structure conventions. Check all | |
| 472 | # possible sized char structs in that range. But only a restricted | |
| 473 | # range of the other types. | |
| 474 | ||
| 475 | # NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized structs in memory. | |
| 476 | ||
| 477 | # d10v is weird. 5/6 byte structs go in memory. 2 or more char | |
| 478 | # structs go in memory. Everything else is in a register! | |
| 479 | ||
| 480 | # Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size. This is what the | |
| 481 | # original "structs" test was doing. | |
| 482 | ||
| 483 | start_structs_test { tc } | |
| 484 | test_struct_calls 1 | |
| 485 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 486 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 487 | test_struct_calls 4 | |
| 488 | test_struct_calls 5 | |
| 489 | test_struct_calls 6 | |
| 490 | test_struct_calls 7 | |
| 491 | test_struct_calls 8 | |
| 492 | test_struct_calls 9 | |
| 493 | test_struct_calls 10 | |
| 494 | test_struct_calls 11 | |
| 495 | test_struct_calls 12 | |
| 496 | test_struct_calls 13 | |
| 497 | test_struct_calls 14 | |
| 498 | test_struct_calls 15 | |
| 499 | test_struct_calls 16 | |
| 500 | test_struct_calls 17 | |
| 501 | test_struct_returns 1 | |
| 502 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 503 | test_struct_returns 3 | |
| 504 | test_struct_returns 4 | |
| 505 | test_struct_returns 5 | |
| 506 | test_struct_returns 6 | |
| 507 | test_struct_returns 7 | |
| 508 | test_struct_returns 8 | |
| 509 | ||
| 510 | ||
| 511 | # Let the fun begin. | |
| 512 | ||
| 513 | # Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory, | |
| 514 | # come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct. For | |
| 515 | # "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct | |
| 516 | # returns" test up to that boundary. | |
| 517 | ||
| 518 | # For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in | |
| 519 | # floating point registers, regardless of their size. | |
| 520 | ||
| 521 | # The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1, | |
| 522 | # ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are | |
| 523 | # naturally aligned. Padding being added where needed. Note that | |
| 524 | # these numbers are just approx, the d10v has ti=2, a 64-bit has has | |
| 525 | # tl=8. | |
| 526 | ||
| 527 | # Approx size: 2, 4, ... | |
| 528 | start_structs_test { ts } | |
| 529 | test_struct_calls 1 | |
| 530 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 531 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 532 | test_struct_calls 4 | |
| 533 | test_struct_calls 5 | |
| 534 | test_struct_returns 1 | |
| 535 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 536 | test_struct_returns 3 | |
| 537 | test_struct_returns 4 | |
| 538 | ||
| 539 | # Approx size: 4, 8, ... | |
| 540 | start_structs_test { ti } | |
| 541 | test_struct_calls 1 | |
| 542 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 543 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 544 | test_struct_returns 1 | |
| 545 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 546 | ||
| 547 | # Approx size: 4, 8, ... | |
| 548 | start_structs_test { tl } | |
| 549 | test_struct_calls 1 | |
| 550 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 551 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 552 | test_struct_returns 1 | |
| 553 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 554 | ||
| 555 | # Approx size: 8, 16, ... | |
| 556 | start_structs_test { tll } | |
| 557 | test_struct_calls 1 | |
| 558 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 559 | test_struct_returns 1 | |
| 560 | ||
| 561 | # Approx size: 4, 8, ... | |
| 562 | start_structs_test { tf } | |
| 563 | test_struct_calls 1 | |
| 564 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 565 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 566 | test_struct_returns 1 | |
| 567 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 568 | ||
| 569 | # Approx size: 8, 16, ... | |
| 570 | start_structs_test { td } | |
| 571 | test_struct_calls 1 | |
| 572 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 573 | test_struct_returns 1 | |
| 574 | ||
| 575 | # Approx size: 16, 32, ... | |
| 576 | start_structs_test { tld } | |
| 577 | test_struct_calls 1 | |
| 578 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 579 | test_struct_returns 1 | |
| 580 | ||
| 581 | # Approx size: 2+1=3, 4, ... | |
| 582 | start_structs_test { ts tc } | |
| 583 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 584 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 585 | test_struct_calls 4 | |
| 586 | test_struct_calls 5 | |
| 587 | test_struct_calls 6 | |
| 588 | test_struct_calls 7 | |
| 589 | test_struct_calls 8 | |
| 590 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 591 | ||
| 592 | # Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ... | |
| 593 | start_structs_test { ti tc } | |
| 594 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 595 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 596 | test_struct_calls 4 | |
| 597 | test_struct_calls 5 | |
| 598 | test_struct_calls 6 | |
| 599 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 600 | ||
| 601 | # Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ... | |
| 602 | start_structs_test { tl tc } | |
| 603 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 604 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 605 | test_struct_calls 4 | |
| 606 | test_struct_calls 5 | |
| 607 | test_struct_calls 6 | |
| 608 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 609 | ||
| 610 | # Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ... | |
| 611 | start_structs_test { tll tc } | |
| 612 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 613 | ||
| 614 | # Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ... | |
| 615 | start_structs_test { tf tc } | |
| 616 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 617 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 618 | test_struct_calls 4 | |
| 619 | test_struct_calls 5 | |
| 620 | test_struct_calls 6 | |
| 621 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 622 | ||
| 623 | # Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ... | |
| 624 | start_structs_test { td tc } | |
| 625 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 626 | ||
| 627 | # Approx size: 16+1=17, 18, ... | |
| 628 | start_structs_test { tld tc } | |
| 629 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 630 | ||
| 631 | # Approx size: (1+1)+2=4, 6, ... | |
| 632 | start_structs_test { tc ts } | |
| 633 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 634 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 635 | test_struct_calls 4 | |
| 636 | test_struct_calls 5 | |
| 637 | test_struct_calls 6 | |
| 638 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 639 | ||
| 640 | # Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ... | |
| 641 | start_structs_test { tc ti } | |
| 642 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 643 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 644 | test_struct_calls 4 | |
| 645 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 646 | ||
| 647 | # Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ... | |
| 648 | start_structs_test { tc tl } | |
| 649 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 650 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 651 | test_struct_calls 4 | |
| 652 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 653 | ||
| 654 | # Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ... | |
| 655 | start_structs_test { tc tll } | |
| 656 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 657 | ||
| 658 | # Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ... | |
| 659 | start_structs_test { tc tf } | |
| 660 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 661 | test_struct_calls 3 | |
| 662 | test_struct_calls 4 | |
| 663 | ||
| 664 | # Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ... | |
| 665 | start_structs_test { tc td } | |
| 666 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 667 | ||
| 668 | # Approx size: (1+15)+16=32, 48, ... | |
| 669 | start_structs_test { tc tld } | |
| 670 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 671 | ||
| 672 | # Some float combinations | |
| 673 | ||
| 674 | # Approx size: 8+4=12, 16, ... | |
| 675 | # d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ... | |
| 676 | start_structs_test { td tf } | |
| 677 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 678 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 74cf1395 | 679 | |
| e53890ae AC |
680 | # Approx size: (4+4)+8=16, 32, ... |
| 681 | # d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ... | |
| 682 | start_structs_test { tf td } | |
| 683 | test_struct_calls 2 | |
| 684 | test_struct_returns 2 | |
| 74cf1395 JM |
685 | |
| 686 | return 0 |