[PATCH] capable/capability.h (net/)
[deliverable/linux.git] / net / ipv4 / tcp_minisocks.c
CommitLineData
1da177e4
LT
1/*
2 * INET An implementation of the TCP/IP protocol suite for the LINUX
3 * operating system. INET is implemented using the BSD Socket
4 * interface as the means of communication with the user level.
5 *
6 * Implementation of the Transmission Control Protocol(TCP).
7 *
8 * Version: $Id: tcp_minisocks.c,v 1.15 2002/02/01 22:01:04 davem Exp $
9 *
02c30a84 10 * Authors: Ross Biro
1da177e4
LT
11 * Fred N. van Kempen, <waltje@uWalt.NL.Mugnet.ORG>
12 * Mark Evans, <evansmp@uhura.aston.ac.uk>
13 * Corey Minyard <wf-rch!minyard@relay.EU.net>
14 * Florian La Roche, <flla@stud.uni-sb.de>
15 * Charles Hedrick, <hedrick@klinzhai.rutgers.edu>
16 * Linus Torvalds, <torvalds@cs.helsinki.fi>
17 * Alan Cox, <gw4pts@gw4pts.ampr.org>
18 * Matthew Dillon, <dillon@apollo.west.oic.com>
19 * Arnt Gulbrandsen, <agulbra@nvg.unit.no>
20 * Jorge Cwik, <jorge@laser.satlink.net>
21 */
22
23#include <linux/config.h>
24#include <linux/mm.h>
25#include <linux/module.h>
26#include <linux/sysctl.h>
27#include <linux/workqueue.h>
28#include <net/tcp.h>
29#include <net/inet_common.h>
30#include <net/xfrm.h>
31
32#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
33#define SYNC_INIT 0 /* let the user enable it */
34#else
35#define SYNC_INIT 1
36#endif
37
1da177e4
LT
38int sysctl_tcp_syncookies = SYNC_INIT;
39int sysctl_tcp_abort_on_overflow;
40
295ff7ed
ACM
41struct inet_timewait_death_row tcp_death_row = {
42 .sysctl_max_tw_buckets = NR_FILE * 2,
43 .period = TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN / INET_TWDR_TWKILL_SLOTS,
44 .death_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
45 .hashinfo = &tcp_hashinfo,
46 .tw_timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(inet_twdr_hangman, 0,
47 (unsigned long)&tcp_death_row),
48 .twkill_work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(tcp_death_row.twkill_work,
49 inet_twdr_twkill_work,
50 &tcp_death_row),
51/* Short-time timewait calendar */
52
53 .twcal_hand = -1,
54 .twcal_timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(inet_twdr_twcal_tick, 0,
55 (unsigned long)&tcp_death_row),
56};
57
58EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_death_row);
59
1da177e4
LT
60static __inline__ int tcp_in_window(u32 seq, u32 end_seq, u32 s_win, u32 e_win)
61{
62 if (seq == s_win)
63 return 1;
64 if (after(end_seq, s_win) && before(seq, e_win))
65 return 1;
66 return (seq == e_win && seq == end_seq);
67}
68
1da177e4
LT
69/*
70 * * Main purpose of TIME-WAIT state is to close connection gracefully,
71 * when one of ends sits in LAST-ACK or CLOSING retransmitting FIN
72 * (and, probably, tail of data) and one or more our ACKs are lost.
73 * * What is TIME-WAIT timeout? It is associated with maximal packet
74 * lifetime in the internet, which results in wrong conclusion, that
75 * it is set to catch "old duplicate segments" wandering out of their path.
76 * It is not quite correct. This timeout is calculated so that it exceeds
77 * maximal retransmission timeout enough to allow to lose one (or more)
78 * segments sent by peer and our ACKs. This time may be calculated from RTO.
79 * * When TIME-WAIT socket receives RST, it means that another end
80 * finally closed and we are allowed to kill TIME-WAIT too.
81 * * Second purpose of TIME-WAIT is catching old duplicate segments.
82 * Well, certainly it is pure paranoia, but if we load TIME-WAIT
83 * with this semantics, we MUST NOT kill TIME-WAIT state with RSTs.
84 * * If we invented some more clever way to catch duplicates
85 * (f.e. based on PAWS), we could truncate TIME-WAIT to several RTOs.
86 *
87 * The algorithm below is based on FORMAL INTERPRETATION of RFCs.
88 * When you compare it to RFCs, please, read section SEGMENT ARRIVES
89 * from the very beginning.
90 *
91 * NOTE. With recycling (and later with fin-wait-2) TW bucket
92 * is _not_ stateless. It means, that strictly speaking we must
93 * spinlock it. I do not want! Well, probability of misbehaviour
94 * is ridiculously low and, seems, we could use some mb() tricks
95 * to avoid misread sequence numbers, states etc. --ANK
96 */
97enum tcp_tw_status
8feaf0c0
ACM
98tcp_timewait_state_process(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, struct sk_buff *skb,
99 const struct tcphdr *th)
1da177e4 100{
8feaf0c0 101 struct tcp_timewait_sock *tcptw = tcp_twsk((struct sock *)tw);
1da177e4
LT
102 struct tcp_options_received tmp_opt;
103 int paws_reject = 0;
104
105 tmp_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
8feaf0c0 106 if (th->doff > (sizeof(*th) >> 2) && tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp) {
1da177e4
LT
107 tcp_parse_options(skb, &tmp_opt, 0);
108
109 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
8feaf0c0
ACM
110 tmp_opt.ts_recent = tcptw->tw_ts_recent;
111 tmp_opt.ts_recent_stamp = tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp;
1da177e4
LT
112 paws_reject = tcp_paws_check(&tmp_opt, th->rst);
113 }
114 }
115
116 if (tw->tw_substate == TCP_FIN_WAIT2) {
117 /* Just repeat all the checks of tcp_rcv_state_process() */
118
119 /* Out of window, send ACK */
120 if (paws_reject ||
121 !tcp_in_window(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq,
8feaf0c0
ACM
122 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt,
123 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt + tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd))
1da177e4
LT
124 return TCP_TW_ACK;
125
126 if (th->rst)
127 goto kill;
128
8feaf0c0 129 if (th->syn && !before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt))
1da177e4
LT
130 goto kill_with_rst;
131
132 /* Dup ACK? */
8feaf0c0 133 if (!after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt) ||
1da177e4 134 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq) {
8feaf0c0 135 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
136 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
137 }
138
139 /* New data or FIN. If new data arrive after half-duplex close,
140 * reset.
141 */
142 if (!th->fin ||
8feaf0c0 143 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq != tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt + 1) {
1da177e4 144kill_with_rst:
295ff7ed 145 inet_twsk_deschedule(tw, &tcp_death_row);
8feaf0c0 146 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
147 return TCP_TW_RST;
148 }
149
150 /* FIN arrived, enter true time-wait state. */
8feaf0c0
ACM
151 tw->tw_substate = TCP_TIME_WAIT;
152 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
1da177e4 153 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
8feaf0c0
ACM
154 tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec;
155 tcptw->tw_ts_recent = tmp_opt.rcv_tsval;
1da177e4
LT
156 }
157
158 /* I am shamed, but failed to make it more elegant.
159 * Yes, it is direct reference to IP, which is impossible
160 * to generalize to IPv6. Taking into account that IPv6
caa20d9a 161 * do not understand recycling in any case, it not
1da177e4
LT
162 * a big problem in practice. --ANK */
163 if (tw->tw_family == AF_INET &&
295ff7ed 164 tcp_death_row.sysctl_tw_recycle && tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp &&
1da177e4 165 tcp_v4_tw_remember_stamp(tw))
696ab2d3
ACM
166 inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &tcp_death_row, tw->tw_timeout,
167 TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
1da177e4 168 else
696ab2d3
ACM
169 inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &tcp_death_row, TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN,
170 TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
1da177e4
LT
171 return TCP_TW_ACK;
172 }
173
174 /*
175 * Now real TIME-WAIT state.
176 *
177 * RFC 1122:
178 * "When a connection is [...] on TIME-WAIT state [...]
179 * [a TCP] MAY accept a new SYN from the remote TCP to
180 * reopen the connection directly, if it:
181 *
182 * (1) assigns its initial sequence number for the new
183 * connection to be larger than the largest sequence
184 * number it used on the previous connection incarnation,
185 * and
186 *
187 * (2) returns to TIME-WAIT state if the SYN turns out
188 * to be an old duplicate".
189 */
190
191 if (!paws_reject &&
8feaf0c0 192 (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt &&
1da177e4
LT
193 (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq || th->rst))) {
194 /* In window segment, it may be only reset or bare ack. */
195
196 if (th->rst) {
caa20d9a 197 /* This is TIME_WAIT assassination, in two flavors.
1da177e4
LT
198 * Oh well... nobody has a sufficient solution to this
199 * protocol bug yet.
200 */
201 if (sysctl_tcp_rfc1337 == 0) {
202kill:
295ff7ed 203 inet_twsk_deschedule(tw, &tcp_death_row);
8feaf0c0 204 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
205 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
206 }
207 }
696ab2d3
ACM
208 inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &tcp_death_row, TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN,
209 TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
1da177e4
LT
210
211 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
8feaf0c0
ACM
212 tcptw->tw_ts_recent = tmp_opt.rcv_tsval;
213 tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec;
1da177e4
LT
214 }
215
8feaf0c0 216 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
217 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
218 }
219
220 /* Out of window segment.
221
222 All the segments are ACKed immediately.
223
224 The only exception is new SYN. We accept it, if it is
225 not old duplicate and we are not in danger to be killed
226 by delayed old duplicates. RFC check is that it has
227 newer sequence number works at rates <40Mbit/sec.
228 However, if paws works, it is reliable AND even more,
229 we even may relax silly seq space cutoff.
230
231 RED-PEN: we violate main RFC requirement, if this SYN will appear
232 old duplicate (i.e. we receive RST in reply to SYN-ACK),
233 we must return socket to time-wait state. It is not good,
234 but not fatal yet.
235 */
236
237 if (th->syn && !th->rst && !th->ack && !paws_reject &&
8feaf0c0
ACM
238 (after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt) ||
239 (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp &&
240 (s32)(tcptw->tw_ts_recent - tmp_opt.rcv_tsval) < 0))) {
241 u32 isn = tcptw->tw_snd_nxt + 65535 + 2;
1da177e4
LT
242 if (isn == 0)
243 isn++;
244 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when = isn;
245 return TCP_TW_SYN;
246 }
247
248 if (paws_reject)
249 NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_PAWSESTABREJECTED);
250
251 if(!th->rst) {
252 /* In this case we must reset the TIMEWAIT timer.
253 *
254 * If it is ACKless SYN it may be both old duplicate
255 * and new good SYN with random sequence number <rcv_nxt.
256 * Do not reschedule in the last case.
257 */
258 if (paws_reject || th->ack)
696ab2d3
ACM
259 inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &tcp_death_row, TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN,
260 TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
1da177e4
LT
261
262 /* Send ACK. Note, we do not put the bucket,
263 * it will be released by caller.
264 */
265 return TCP_TW_ACK;
266 }
8feaf0c0 267 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
268 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
269}
270
1da177e4
LT
271/*
272 * Move a socket to time-wait or dead fin-wait-2 state.
273 */
274void tcp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo)
275{
8feaf0c0 276 struct inet_timewait_sock *tw = NULL;
8292a17a 277 const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
8feaf0c0 278 const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
1da177e4
LT
279 int recycle_ok = 0;
280
295ff7ed 281 if (tcp_death_row.sysctl_tw_recycle && tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp)
8292a17a 282 recycle_ok = icsk->icsk_af_ops->remember_stamp(sk);
1da177e4 283
295ff7ed 284 if (tcp_death_row.tw_count < tcp_death_row.sysctl_max_tw_buckets)
c676270b 285 tw = inet_twsk_alloc(sk, state);
1da177e4 286
8feaf0c0
ACM
287 if (tw != NULL) {
288 struct tcp_timewait_sock *tcptw = tcp_twsk((struct sock *)tw);
463c84b9 289 const int rto = (icsk->icsk_rto << 2) - (icsk->icsk_rto >> 1);
8feaf0c0 290
1da177e4 291 tw->tw_rcv_wscale = tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale;
8feaf0c0
ACM
292 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt = tp->rcv_nxt;
293 tcptw->tw_snd_nxt = tp->snd_nxt;
294 tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd = tcp_receive_window(tp);
295 tcptw->tw_ts_recent = tp->rx_opt.ts_recent;
296 tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp = tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp;
1da177e4
LT
297
298#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
299 if (tw->tw_family == PF_INET6) {
300 struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
0fa1a53e 301 struct inet6_timewait_sock *tw6;
1da177e4 302
0fa1a53e
ACM
303 tw->tw_ipv6_offset = inet6_tw_offset(sk->sk_prot);
304 tw6 = inet6_twsk((struct sock *)tw);
305 ipv6_addr_copy(&tw6->tw_v6_daddr, &np->daddr);
306 ipv6_addr_copy(&tw6->tw_v6_rcv_saddr, &np->rcv_saddr);
8feaf0c0 307 tw->tw_ipv6only = np->ipv6only;
c676270b 308 }
1da177e4
LT
309#endif
310 /* Linkage updates. */
e48c414e 311 __inet_twsk_hashdance(tw, sk, &tcp_hashinfo);
1da177e4
LT
312
313 /* Get the TIME_WAIT timeout firing. */
314 if (timeo < rto)
315 timeo = rto;
316
317 if (recycle_ok) {
318 tw->tw_timeout = rto;
319 } else {
320 tw->tw_timeout = TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
321 if (state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
322 timeo = TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
323 }
324
696ab2d3
ACM
325 inet_twsk_schedule(tw, &tcp_death_row, timeo,
326 TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
8feaf0c0 327 inet_twsk_put(tw);
1da177e4
LT
328 } else {
329 /* Sorry, if we're out of memory, just CLOSE this
330 * socket up. We've got bigger problems than
331 * non-graceful socket closings.
332 */
333 if (net_ratelimit())
334 printk(KERN_INFO "TCP: time wait bucket table overflow\n");
335 }
336
337 tcp_update_metrics(sk);
338 tcp_done(sk);
339}
340
1da177e4
LT
341/* This is not only more efficient than what we used to do, it eliminates
342 * a lot of code duplication between IPv4/IPv6 SYN recv processing. -DaveM
343 *
344 * Actually, we could lots of memory writes here. tp of listening
345 * socket contains all necessary default parameters.
346 */
60236fdd 347struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, struct sk_buff *skb)
1da177e4 348{
9f1d2604 349 struct sock *newsk = inet_csk_clone(sk, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
1da177e4 350
87d11ceb 351 if (newsk != NULL) {
9f1d2604 352 const struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req);
2e6599cb 353 struct tcp_request_sock *treq = tcp_rsk(req);
9f1d2604 354 struct inet_connection_sock *newicsk = inet_csk(sk);
1da177e4 355 struct tcp_sock *newtp;
1da177e4 356
1da177e4
LT
357 /* Now setup tcp_sock */
358 newtp = tcp_sk(newsk);
359 newtp->pred_flags = 0;
2e6599cb 360 newtp->rcv_nxt = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
87d11ceb 361 newtp->snd_nxt = newtp->snd_una = newtp->snd_sml = treq->snt_isn + 1;
1da177e4
LT
362
363 tcp_prequeue_init(newtp);
364
2e6599cb 365 tcp_init_wl(newtp, treq->snt_isn, treq->rcv_isn);
1da177e4 366
1da177e4
LT
367 newtp->srtt = 0;
368 newtp->mdev = TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT;
463c84b9 369 newicsk->icsk_rto = TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT;
1da177e4
LT
370
371 newtp->packets_out = 0;
372 newtp->left_out = 0;
373 newtp->retrans_out = 0;
374 newtp->sacked_out = 0;
375 newtp->fackets_out = 0;
376 newtp->snd_ssthresh = 0x7fffffff;
377
378 /* So many TCP implementations out there (incorrectly) count the
379 * initial SYN frame in their delayed-ACK and congestion control
380 * algorithms that we must have the following bandaid to talk
381 * efficiently to them. -DaveM
382 */
383 newtp->snd_cwnd = 2;
384 newtp->snd_cwnd_cnt = 0;
9772efb9 385 newtp->bytes_acked = 0;
1da177e4
LT
386
387 newtp->frto_counter = 0;
388 newtp->frto_highmark = 0;
389
7957aed7 390 newicsk->icsk_ca_ops = &tcp_init_congestion_ops;
317a76f9 391
6687e988 392 tcp_set_ca_state(newsk, TCP_CA_Open);
1da177e4
LT
393 tcp_init_xmit_timers(newsk);
394 skb_queue_head_init(&newtp->out_of_order_queue);
2e6599cb
ACM
395 newtp->rcv_wup = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
396 newtp->write_seq = treq->snt_isn + 1;
1da177e4 397 newtp->pushed_seq = newtp->write_seq;
2e6599cb 398 newtp->copied_seq = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
1da177e4
LT
399
400 newtp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
401
402 newtp->rx_opt.dsack = 0;
403 newtp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = 0;
404
1da177e4
LT
405 newtp->rx_opt.num_sacks = 0;
406 newtp->urg_data = 0;
1da177e4 407
1da177e4 408 if (sock_flag(newsk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN))
463c84b9
ACM
409 inet_csk_reset_keepalive_timer(newsk,
410 keepalive_time_when(newtp));
1da177e4 411
2e6599cb
ACM
412 newtp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok = ireq->tstamp_ok;
413 if((newtp->rx_opt.sack_ok = ireq->sack_ok) != 0) {
1da177e4
LT
414 if (sysctl_tcp_fack)
415 newtp->rx_opt.sack_ok |= 2;
416 }
417 newtp->window_clamp = req->window_clamp;
418 newtp->rcv_ssthresh = req->rcv_wnd;
419 newtp->rcv_wnd = req->rcv_wnd;
2e6599cb 420 newtp->rx_opt.wscale_ok = ireq->wscale_ok;
1da177e4 421 if (newtp->rx_opt.wscale_ok) {
2e6599cb
ACM
422 newtp->rx_opt.snd_wscale = ireq->snd_wscale;
423 newtp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale = ireq->rcv_wscale;
1da177e4
LT
424 } else {
425 newtp->rx_opt.snd_wscale = newtp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale = 0;
426 newtp->window_clamp = min(newtp->window_clamp, 65535U);
427 }
428 newtp->snd_wnd = ntohs(skb->h.th->window) << newtp->rx_opt.snd_wscale;
429 newtp->max_window = newtp->snd_wnd;
430
431 if (newtp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok) {
432 newtp->rx_opt.ts_recent = req->ts_recent;
433 newtp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec;
434 newtp->tcp_header_len = sizeof(struct tcphdr) + TCPOLEN_TSTAMP_ALIGNED;
435 } else {
436 newtp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = 0;
437 newtp->tcp_header_len = sizeof(struct tcphdr);
438 }
439 if (skb->len >= TCP_MIN_RCVMSS+newtp->tcp_header_len)
463c84b9 440 newicsk->icsk_ack.last_seg_size = skb->len - newtp->tcp_header_len;
1da177e4
LT
441 newtp->rx_opt.mss_clamp = req->mss;
442 TCP_ECN_openreq_child(newtp, req);
443 if (newtp->ecn_flags&TCP_ECN_OK)
444 sock_set_flag(newsk, SOCK_NO_LARGESEND);
445
1da177e4
LT
446 TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_PASSIVEOPENS);
447 }
448 return newsk;
449}
450
451/*
452 * Process an incoming packet for SYN_RECV sockets represented
60236fdd 453 * as a request_sock.
1da177e4
LT
454 */
455
456struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk,struct sk_buff *skb,
60236fdd
ACM
457 struct request_sock *req,
458 struct request_sock **prev)
1da177e4
LT
459{
460 struct tcphdr *th = skb->h.th;
1da177e4
LT
461 u32 flg = tcp_flag_word(th) & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN|TCP_FLAG_ACK);
462 int paws_reject = 0;
463 struct tcp_options_received tmp_opt;
464 struct sock *child;
465
466 tmp_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
467 if (th->doff > (sizeof(struct tcphdr)>>2)) {
468 tcp_parse_options(skb, &tmp_opt, 0);
469
470 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
471 tmp_opt.ts_recent = req->ts_recent;
472 /* We do not store true stamp, but it is not required,
473 * it can be estimated (approximately)
474 * from another data.
475 */
476 tmp_opt.ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec - ((TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT/HZ)<<req->retrans);
477 paws_reject = tcp_paws_check(&tmp_opt, th->rst);
478 }
479 }
480
481 /* Check for pure retransmitted SYN. */
2e6599cb 482 if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn &&
1da177e4
LT
483 flg == TCP_FLAG_SYN &&
484 !paws_reject) {
485 /*
486 * RFC793 draws (Incorrectly! It was fixed in RFC1122)
487 * this case on figure 6 and figure 8, but formal
488 * protocol description says NOTHING.
489 * To be more exact, it says that we should send ACK,
490 * because this segment (at least, if it has no data)
491 * is out of window.
492 *
493 * CONCLUSION: RFC793 (even with RFC1122) DOES NOT
494 * describe SYN-RECV state. All the description
495 * is wrong, we cannot believe to it and should
496 * rely only on common sense and implementation
497 * experience.
498 *
499 * Enforce "SYN-ACK" according to figure 8, figure 6
500 * of RFC793, fixed by RFC1122.
501 */
60236fdd 502 req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(sk, req, NULL);
1da177e4
LT
503 return NULL;
504 }
505
506 /* Further reproduces section "SEGMENT ARRIVES"
507 for state SYN-RECEIVED of RFC793.
508 It is broken, however, it does not work only
509 when SYNs are crossed.
510
511 You would think that SYN crossing is impossible here, since
512 we should have a SYN_SENT socket (from connect()) on our end,
513 but this is not true if the crossed SYNs were sent to both
514 ends by a malicious third party. We must defend against this,
515 and to do that we first verify the ACK (as per RFC793, page
516 36) and reset if it is invalid. Is this a true full defense?
517 To convince ourselves, let us consider a way in which the ACK
518 test can still pass in this 'malicious crossed SYNs' case.
519 Malicious sender sends identical SYNs (and thus identical sequence
520 numbers) to both A and B:
521
522 A: gets SYN, seq=7
523 B: gets SYN, seq=7
524
525 By our good fortune, both A and B select the same initial
526 send sequence number of seven :-)
527
528 A: sends SYN|ACK, seq=7, ack_seq=8
529 B: sends SYN|ACK, seq=7, ack_seq=8
530
531 So we are now A eating this SYN|ACK, ACK test passes. So
532 does sequence test, SYN is truncated, and thus we consider
533 it a bare ACK.
534
295f7324
ACM
535 If icsk->icsk_accept_queue.rskq_defer_accept, we silently drop this
536 bare ACK. Otherwise, we create an established connection. Both
537 ends (listening sockets) accept the new incoming connection and try
538 to talk to each other. 8-)
1da177e4
LT
539
540 Note: This case is both harmless, and rare. Possibility is about the
541 same as us discovering intelligent life on another plant tomorrow.
542
543 But generally, we should (RFC lies!) to accept ACK
544 from SYNACK both here and in tcp_rcv_state_process().
545 tcp_rcv_state_process() does not, hence, we do not too.
546
547 Note that the case is absolutely generic:
548 we cannot optimize anything here without
549 violating protocol. All the checks must be made
550 before attempt to create socket.
551 */
552
553 /* RFC793 page 36: "If the connection is in any non-synchronized state ...
554 * and the incoming segment acknowledges something not yet
caa20d9a 555 * sent (the segment carries an unacceptable ACK) ...
1da177e4
LT
556 * a reset is sent."
557 *
558 * Invalid ACK: reset will be sent by listening socket
559 */
560 if ((flg & TCP_FLAG_ACK) &&
2e6599cb 561 (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq != tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn + 1))
1da177e4
LT
562 return sk;
563
564 /* Also, it would be not so bad idea to check rcv_tsecr, which
565 * is essentially ACK extension and too early or too late values
566 * should cause reset in unsynchronized states.
567 */
568
569 /* RFC793: "first check sequence number". */
570
571 if (paws_reject || !tcp_in_window(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq,
2e6599cb 572 tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1, tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1 + req->rcv_wnd)) {
1da177e4
LT
573 /* Out of window: send ACK and drop. */
574 if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_RST))
60236fdd 575 req->rsk_ops->send_ack(skb, req);
1da177e4
LT
576 if (paws_reject)
577 NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_PAWSESTABREJECTED);
578 return NULL;
579 }
580
581 /* In sequence, PAWS is OK. */
582
2e6599cb 583 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp && !after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1))
1da177e4
LT
584 req->ts_recent = tmp_opt.rcv_tsval;
585
2e6599cb 586 if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn) {
1da177e4 587 /* Truncate SYN, it is out of window starting
2e6599cb 588 at tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1. */
1da177e4
LT
589 flg &= ~TCP_FLAG_SYN;
590 }
591
592 /* RFC793: "second check the RST bit" and
593 * "fourth, check the SYN bit"
594 */
595 if (flg & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN))
596 goto embryonic_reset;
597
598 /* ACK sequence verified above, just make sure ACK is
599 * set. If ACK not set, just silently drop the packet.
600 */
601 if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_ACK))
602 return NULL;
603
604 /* If TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is set, drop bare ACK. */
295f7324
ACM
605 if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue.rskq_defer_accept &&
606 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1) {
2e6599cb 607 inet_rsk(req)->acked = 1;
1da177e4
LT
608 return NULL;
609 }
610
611 /* OK, ACK is valid, create big socket and
612 * feed this segment to it. It will repeat all
613 * the tests. THIS SEGMENT MUST MOVE SOCKET TO
614 * ESTABLISHED STATE. If it will be dropped after
615 * socket is created, wait for troubles.
616 */
8292a17a
ACM
617 child = inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops->syn_recv_sock(sk, skb,
618 req, NULL);
1da177e4
LT
619 if (child == NULL)
620 goto listen_overflow;
621
463c84b9
ACM
622 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_unlink(sk, req, prev);
623 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_removed(sk, req);
1da177e4 624
463c84b9 625 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add(sk, req, child);
1da177e4
LT
626 return child;
627
628 listen_overflow:
629 if (!sysctl_tcp_abort_on_overflow) {
2e6599cb 630 inet_rsk(req)->acked = 1;
1da177e4
LT
631 return NULL;
632 }
633
634 embryonic_reset:
635 NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_EMBRYONICRSTS);
636 if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_RST))
60236fdd 637 req->rsk_ops->send_reset(skb);
1da177e4 638
463c84b9 639 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(sk, req, prev);
1da177e4
LT
640 return NULL;
641}
642
643/*
644 * Queue segment on the new socket if the new socket is active,
645 * otherwise we just shortcircuit this and continue with
646 * the new socket.
647 */
648
649int tcp_child_process(struct sock *parent, struct sock *child,
650 struct sk_buff *skb)
651{
652 int ret = 0;
653 int state = child->sk_state;
654
655 if (!sock_owned_by_user(child)) {
656 ret = tcp_rcv_state_process(child, skb, skb->h.th, skb->len);
657
658 /* Wakeup parent, send SIGIO */
659 if (state == TCP_SYN_RECV && child->sk_state != state)
660 parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);
661 } else {
662 /* Alas, it is possible again, because we do lookup
663 * in main socket hash table and lock on listening
664 * socket does not protect us more.
665 */
666 sk_add_backlog(child, skb);
667 }
668
669 bh_unlock_sock(child);
670 sock_put(child);
671 return ret;
672}
673
674EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_check_req);
675EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_child_process);
676EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_create_openreq_child);
677EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_timewait_state_process);
This page took 0.128621 seconds and 5 git commands to generate.