546fc2de8a11ff5c6433523b10f60a075a3be5c5
[deliverable/binutils-gdb.git] / binutils / MAINTAINERS
1 ========= Binutils Maintainers =========
2
3 This is the list of individuals responsible for maintenance and update
4 of the GNU Binary Utilities project. This includes the linker (ld),
5 the assembler (gas), the profiler (gprof), a whole suite of other
6 programs (binutils) and the libraries that they use (bfd and
7 opcodes). This project shares a common set of header files with the
8 GCC and GDB projects (include), so maintainership of those files is
9 shared amoungst the projects.
10
11 The home page for binutils is:
12
13 http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/binutils.html
14
15 and patches should be sent to:
16
17 bug-binutils@gnu.org
18
19 with "[Patch]" as part of the subject line. Note - patches to the
20 top level configure.in and config.sub scripts should be sent to:
21
22 config-patches@gnu.org
23
24 and not to the binutils list.
25
26 --------- Blanket Write Privs ---------
27
28 The following people have permission to check patches into the
29 repository without obtaining approval first:
30
31 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> (head maintainer)
32 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
33 Ian Taylor <ian@zembu.com>
34 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
35 Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
36 DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
37 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
38 Michael Meissner <meissner@redhat.com>
39
40 --------- Maintainers ---------
41
42 Maintainers are individuals who are responsible for, and have
43 permission to check in changes in, certain subsets of the code. Note
44 that maintainers still need approval to check in changes outside of
45 the immediate domain that they maintain.
46
47 If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
48 falls to the head maintainer (above). If there are several
49 maintainers for a given domain then responsibility falls to the first
50 maintainer. The first maintainer is free to devolve that
51 responsibility among the other maintainers.
52
53 ARC Peter Targett <peter.targett@arc.com>
54 ARM Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
55 ARM Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
56 AVR Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru>
57 CRIS Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
58 DWARF2 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
59 HPPA elf32 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
60 IA64 Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
61 i860 Jason Eckhardt <jle@redhat.com>
62 ix86 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
63 ix86 COFF,PE DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
64 ix86 H.J.Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
65 ix86 INTEL MODE Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
66 M68HC11 M68HC12 Stephane Carrez <Stephane.Carrez@worldnet.fr>
67 M88k Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
68 MIPS Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
69 MMIX Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
70 MN10300 Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
71 MN10300 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
72 PPC Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>
73 PPC XCOFF Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
74 s390, s390x Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
75 SH Jörn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
76 SH Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
77 SH Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
78 SPARC Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
79 TIC54X Timothy Wall <twall@alum.mit.edu>
80 x86_64 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
81 x86_64 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
82 z8k Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org>
83
84
85 --------- CGEN Maintainers -------------
86
87 CGEN is a tool for building, amongst other things, assemblers,
88 disassemblers and simulators from a single description of a CPU.
89 It creates files in several of the binutils directories, but it
90 is mentioned here since there is a single group that maintains
91 CGEN and the files that it creates.
92
93 If you have CGEN related problems you can send email to;
94
95 cgen@sources.redhat.com
96
97 The current CGEN maintainers are:
98
99 Doug Evans, Ben Elliston, Frank Eigler
100
101 --------- Write After Approval ---------
102
103 Individuals with "write after approval" have the ability to check in
104 changes, but they must get approval for each change from someone in
105 one of the above lists (blanket write or maintainers).
106
107 [It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the
108 *ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Just
109 remember to get approval before checking anything in.]
110
111 ------------- Obvious Fixes -------------
112
113 Fixes for obvious mistakes do not need approval, and can be checked in
114 right away, but the patch should still be sent to the binutils list.
115 The definition of obvious is a bit hazy, and if you are not sure, then
116 you should seek approval first. Obvious fixes include fixes for
117 spelling mistakes, blatantly incorrect code (where the correct code is
118 also blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always be
119 small, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they contain
120 some un-obvious side effect or consequence.
121
122 --------- Branch Checkins ---------
123
124 If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can
125 also be checked into the current release branch. Normally however
126 only bug fixes should be applied to the branch. New features, new
127 ports, etc, should be restricted to the mainline. (Otherwise the
128 burden of maintaining the branch in sync with the mainline becomes too
129 great). If you are uncertain as to whether a patch is appropriate for
130 the branch, ask the branch maintainer. This is:
131
132 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
This page took 0.036842 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.