1 # This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
3 # Copyright 1996-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
6 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
7 # the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
8 # (at your option) any later version.
10 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
11 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
12 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
13 # GNU General Public License for more details.
15 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
16 # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
19 # Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this
22 if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {
23 unsupported "This target can not call functions"
29 # Regex matching any value of `char' type like: a = 65 'A'
30 set anychar_re {-?[0-9]{1,3} '(.|\\([0-7]{3}|[a-z]|\\|'))'}
32 # Create and source the file that provides information about the
33 # compiler used to compile the test case.
35 if [get_compiler_info] {
39 # Compile a variant of structs.c using TYPES to specify the type of
40 # the first N struct elements (the remaining elements take the type of
41 # the last TYPES field). Run the compmiled program up to "main".
42 # Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build.
45 proc start_structs_test { types } {
55 # Create the additional flags
57 set testfile "structs"
59 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
61 set t [lindex ${types} $n]
62 lappend flags "additional_flags=-Dt${m}=${t}"
63 append testfile "-" "$t"
66 set binfile [standard_output_file ${testfile}]
67 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags}"] != "" } {
68 # built the second test case since we can't use prototypes
69 warning "Prototypes not supported, rebuilding with -DNO_PROTOTYPES"
70 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags} additional_flags=-DNO_PROTOTYPES"] != "" } {
76 # Start with a fresh gdb.
79 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
82 # Make certain that the output is consistent
83 gdb_test_no_output "set print sevenbit-strings"
84 gdb_test_no_output "set print address off"
85 gdb_test_no_output "set width 0"
86 gdb_test_no_output "set print elements 300"
89 if { ![runto_main] } then {
93 # Get the debug format
96 # Limit the slow $anychar_re{256} matching for better performance.
100 # Verify $anychar_re can match all the values of `char' type.
101 gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "chartest-done"]
102 gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "chartest-done" ".*chartest-done.*"
103 gdb_test "p chartest" "= {({c = ${anychar_re}}, ){255}{c = ${anychar_re}}}"
106 # check that at the struct containing all the relevant types is correct
107 set foo_t "type = struct struct[llength ${types}] \{"
108 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
109 append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+[lindex ${types} $n] [i2a $n];"
111 append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+\}"
112 gdb_test "ptype foo[llength ${types}]" "${foo_t}" \
113 "ptype foo[llength ${types}]; ${testfile}"
116 # The expected value for fun${n}, L${n} and foo${n}. First element is
117 # empty to make indexing easier. "foo" returns the modified value,
118 # "zed" returns the invalid value.
124 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2'}"
125 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3'}"
126 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4'}"
127 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5'}"
128 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6'}"
129 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7'}"
130 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8'}"
131 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9'}"
132 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A'}"
133 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B'}"
134 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C'}"
135 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D'}"
136 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E'}"
137 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F'}"
138 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E', o = 111 'o', p = 71 'G'}"
139 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F', p = 112 'p', q = 72 'H'}"
147 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z'}"
148 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z'}"
149 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z'}"
150 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z'}"
151 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z'}"
152 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z'}"
153 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z'}"
154 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z'}"
155 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z'}"
156 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z'}"
157 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z'}"
158 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z'}"
159 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z'}"
160 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z'}"
161 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z'}"
162 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z', q = 90 'Z'}"
169 return [lindex [list \
172 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}}" \
173 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}}" \
174 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}}" \
175 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}}" \
176 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}}" \
177 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}}" \
178 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}}" \
179 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}}" \
180 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}}" \
181 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}}" \
182 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}}" \
183 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}}" \
184 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}}" \
185 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}}" \
186 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}, p = ${ac}}" \
187 "{a = ${ac}, b = ${ac}, c = ${ac}, d = ${ac}, e = ${ac}, f = ${ac}, g = ${ac}, h = ${ac}, i = ${ac}, j = ${ac}, k = ${ac}, l = ${ac}, m = ${ac}, n = ${ac}, o = ${ac}, p = ${ac}, q = ${ac}}" \
191 # Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower
192 # or upper case. This is ment to be i18n proof.
195 return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n]
199 return [string toupper [i2a $n]]
203 # Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
205 proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
207 if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler] && [test_debug_format $format]} {
208 foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $bug $f }
212 # Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions
213 # returning (or passing in a single structs.
215 # N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
216 # for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
219 # start_structs_test() will have previously built a program with a
220 # specified combination of types for those elements. To ensure
221 # robustness of the output, "p/c" is used.
223 # This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and
224 # "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c".
226 proc test_struct_calls { n } {
230 # Check that GDB can always extract a struct-return value from an
231 # inferior function call. Since GDB always knows the location of an
232 # inferior function call's return value these should never fail
234 # Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun$N" and then
235 # examining the return value printed by GDB.
237 set tests "call $n ${testfile}"
239 # Call fun${n}, checking the printed return-value.
240 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
241 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
242 gdb_test "p/c fun${n}()" "[foo ${n}]" "p/c fun<n>(); ${tests}"
244 # Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function.
245 # This test can never fail.
247 # Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun$N" which
248 # stores its parameter in the global variable "L$N". GDB then
249 # examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected.
251 gdb_test_no_output "call Fun${n}(foo${n})" "call Fun<n>(foo<n>); ${tests}"
252 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
253 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
254 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" [foo ${n}] "p/c L<n>; ${tests}"
257 # Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or
258 # "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding
261 # Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return
262 # values. There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in
263 # memory. For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a
264 # failure is "expected". However GDB must still both return the
265 # function and display the final source and line information.
267 # N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
268 # for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
271 # This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract
272 # return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers".
273 # Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the
274 # return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location). The test
275 # is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two
276 # are consistent. GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the
279 proc test_struct_returns { n } {
283 set tests "return $n ${testfile}"
286 # Check that "return" works.
288 # GDB must always force the return of a function that has
289 # a struct result. Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be
290 # possible to store the return value in a register.
292 # The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()". The test forces
293 # "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value. Since that code
294 # snippet will store the returned value in "L{n}" the return
295 # is tested by examining "L{n}". This assumes that the
296 # compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when
297 # the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged. Also check for
298 # consistency between this and the "finish" case.
300 # Get into a call of fun${n}
301 gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
302 "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
303 "advance to fun<n> for return; ${tests}"
305 # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
306 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for return; ${tests}"
308 # Force the "return". This checks that the return is always
309 # performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user.
310 # GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't
311 # known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced
312 # the frame ("No frame").
314 # The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the
315 # entire operation. The value returned is checked further down.
316 # "return_value_known", if non-zero, indicates that GDB knew where
317 # the return value was located.
319 set test "return foo<n>; ${tests}"
320 set return_value_known 1
321 set return_value_unimplemented 0
322 gdb_test_multiple "return foo${n}" "${test}" {
324 # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
325 set return_value_known 0
328 -re "A structure or union" {
329 # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
330 set return_value_known 0
331 # Double ulgh. Architecture doesn't use return_value and
332 # hence hasn't implemented small structure return.
333 set return_value_unimplemented 1
336 -re "Make fun${n} return now.*y or n. $" {
337 gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" {
338 -re "L${n} *= fun${n}.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
339 # Need to step off the function call
340 gdb_test "next" "L.* *= fun.*" "${test}"
342 -re "L[expr ${n} + 1] *= fun[expr ${n} + 1].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
349 # Check that the return-value is as expected. At this stage we're
350 # just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with
351 # "return_value_known" set above.
353 # Note that, when return_value_known is false, we can't make any
354 # assumptions at all about the value L<n>:
356 # - If the caller passed the address of L<n> directly as fun<n>'s
357 # return value buffer, then L<n> will be unchanged, because we
358 # forced fun<n> to return before it could store anything in it.
360 # - If the caller passed the address of some temporary buffer to
361 # fun<n>, and then copied the buffer into L<n>, then L<n> will
362 # have been overwritten with whatever garbage was in the
363 # uninitialized buffer.
365 # - However, if the temporary buffer just happened to have the
366 # "right" value of foo<n> in it, then L<n> will, in fact, have
367 # the value you'd expect to see if the 'return' had worked!
368 # This has actually been observed to happen on the Renesas M32C.
370 # So, really, anything is acceptable unless return_value_known is
373 set test "value foo<n> returned; ${tests}"
374 gdb_test_multiple "p/c L${n}" "${test}" {
375 -re " = [foo ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
376 # This answer is okay regardless of whether GDB claims to
377 # have set the return value: if it did, then this is what
378 # we expected; and if it didn't, then any answer is okay.
381 -re " = [any $n].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
382 if $return_value_known {
383 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew
384 # the location of the return value.
387 # We expected L${n} to be set to garbage, so any
388 # answer is acceptable.
392 -re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" {
393 if $return_value_unimplemented {
394 # What a suprize. The architecture hasn't implemented
395 # return_value, and hence has to fail.
396 kfail "$test" gdb/1444
403 # Check that a "finish" works.
405 # This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs".
406 # Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths.
408 # The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()". The program is
409 # advanced into a call to "fun{n}" and then that function is
410 # finished. The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using
413 # Get into "fun${n}()".
414 gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
415 "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
416 "advance to fun<n> for finish; ${tests}"
418 # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
419 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for finish; ${tests}"
421 # Finish the function, set 'finish_value_known" to non-empty if
422 # the return-value was found.
424 set test "finish foo<n>; ${tests}"
425 set finish_value_known 1
426 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" {
427 -re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
430 -re "Value returned has type: struct struct$n. Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
431 # Expected bad value. For the moment this is ok.
432 set finish_value_known 0
437 # Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust
438 # "p/c". If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous
439 # check that the variable was cleared, is printed.
440 set test "value foo<n> finished; ${tests}"
441 gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" {
442 -re "[foo ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
443 if $finish_value_known {
446 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
447 # know the location of the return-value.
451 -re "[zed ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
452 # The value didn't get found. This is "expected".
453 if $finish_value_known {
454 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB did
455 # know the location of the return-value.
463 # Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent
466 # Since "finish" works in more cases than "return" (see
467 # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_RETURNS_ADDRESS and
468 # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_PRESERVES_ADDRESS), the "return" value being
469 # known implies that the "finish" value is known (but not the
472 set test "return value known implies finish value known; ${tests}"
473 if {$return_value_known && ! $finish_value_known} {
474 kfail gdb/1444 "${test}"
480 # ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things
481 # randomly use register and/and structure conventions. Check all
482 # possible sized char structs in that range. But only a restricted
483 # range of the other types.
485 # NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized structs in memory.
487 # Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size. This is what the
488 # original "structs" test was doing.
490 start_structs_test { tc }
508 test_struct_returns 1
509 test_struct_returns 2
510 test_struct_returns 3
511 test_struct_returns 4
512 test_struct_returns 5
513 test_struct_returns 6
514 test_struct_returns 7
515 test_struct_returns 8
520 # Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory,
521 # come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct. For
522 # "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct
523 # returns" test up to that boundary.
525 # For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in
526 # floating point registers, regardless of their size.
528 # The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1,
529 # ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are
530 # naturally aligned. Padding being added where needed.
532 # Approx size: 2, 4, ...
533 start_structs_test { ts }
539 test_struct_returns 1
540 test_struct_returns 2
541 test_struct_returns 3
542 test_struct_returns 4
544 # Approx size: 4, 8, ...
545 start_structs_test { ti }
549 test_struct_returns 1
550 test_struct_returns 2
552 # Approx size: 4, 8, ...
553 start_structs_test { tl }
557 test_struct_returns 1
558 test_struct_returns 2
560 # Approx size: 8, 16, ...
561 start_structs_test { tll }
564 test_struct_returns 1
566 # Approx size: 4, 8, ...
567 start_structs_test { tf }
571 test_struct_returns 1
572 test_struct_returns 2
574 # Approx size: 8, 16, ...
575 start_structs_test { td }
578 test_struct_returns 1
580 # Approx size: 16, 32, ...
581 start_structs_test { tld }
584 test_struct_returns 1
586 # Approx size: 2+1=3, 4, ...
587 start_structs_test { ts tc }
595 test_struct_returns 2
597 # Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
598 start_structs_test { ti tc }
604 test_struct_returns 2
606 # Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
607 start_structs_test { tl tc }
613 test_struct_returns 2
615 # Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
616 start_structs_test { tll tc }
619 # Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
620 start_structs_test { tf tc }
626 test_struct_returns 2
628 # Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
629 start_structs_test { td tc }
632 # Approx size: 16+1=17, 18, ...
633 start_structs_test { tld tc }
636 # Approx size: (1+1)+2=4, 6, ...
637 start_structs_test { tc ts }
643 test_struct_returns 2
645 # Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
646 start_structs_test { tc ti }
650 test_struct_returns 2
652 # Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
653 start_structs_test { tc tl }
657 test_struct_returns 2
659 # Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
660 start_structs_test { tc tll }
663 # Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
664 start_structs_test { tc tf }
669 # Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
670 start_structs_test { tc td }
673 # Approx size: (1+15)+16=32, 48, ...
674 start_structs_test { tc tld }
677 # Some float combinations
679 # Approx size: 8+4=12, 16, ...
680 start_structs_test { td tf }
682 test_struct_returns 2
684 # Approx size: (4+4)+8=16, 32, ...
685 start_structs_test { tf td }
687 test_struct_returns 2