-/*
- * Sombody else's idea of local labels. They are made by "n:" where n
- * is any decimal digit. Refer to them with
- * "nb" for previous (backward) n:
- * or "nf" for next (forward) n:.
- *
- * We do a little better and let n be any number, not just a single digit, but
- * since the other guy's assembler only does ten, we treat the first ten
- * specially.
- *
- * Like someone else's assembler, we have one set of local label counters for
- * entire assembly, not one set per (sub)segment like in most assemblers. This
- * implies that one can refer to a label in another segment, and indeed some
- * crufty compilers have done just that.
- *
- * Since there could be a LOT of these things, treat them as a sparse array.
- */
+/* Sombody else's idea of local labels. They are made by "n:" where n
+ is any decimal digit. Refer to them with
+ "nb" for previous (backward) n:
+ or "nf" for next (forward) n:.
+
+ We do a little better and let n be any number, not just a single digit, but
+ since the other guy's assembler only does ten, we treat the first ten
+ specially.
+
+ Like someone else's assembler, we have one set of local label counters for
+ entire assembly, not one set per (sub)segment like in most assemblers. This
+ implies that one can refer to a label in another segment, and indeed some
+ crufty compilers have done just that.
+
+ Since there could be a LOT of these things, treat them as a sparse
+ array. */