+ /* See comment related to PR gcc/debug/91507 in
+ block_lookup_symbol_primary. */
+ if (best_symbol (sym, domain))
+ return sym;
+ /* This is a bit of a hack, but symbol_matches_domain might ignore
+ STRUCT vs VAR domain symbols. So if a matching symbol is found,
+ make sure there is no "better" matching symbol, i.e., one with
+ exactly the same domain. PR 16253. */
+ if (symbol_matches_domain (sym->language (),
+ SYMBOL_DOMAIN (sym), domain))
+ other = better_symbol (other, sym, domain);
+ }
+ return other;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Note that parameter symbols do not always show up last in the
+ list; this loop makes sure to take anything else other than
+ parameter symbols first; it only uses parameter symbols as a
+ last resort. Note that this only takes up extra computation
+ time on a match.
+ It's hard to define types in the parameter list (at least in
+ C/C++) so we don't do the same PR 16253 hack here that is done
+ for the !BLOCK_FUNCTION case. */
+
+ struct symbol *sym_found = NULL;
+
+ ALL_BLOCK_SYMBOLS_WITH_NAME (block, lookup_name, iter, sym)
+ {
+ if (symbol_matches_domain (sym->language (),
+ SYMBOL_DOMAIN (sym), domain))
+ {
+ sym_found = sym;
+ if (!SYMBOL_IS_ARGUMENT (sym))
+ {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return (sym_found); /* Will be NULL if not found. */
+ }
+}