- struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch);
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i <= 31; i++)
- {
- if (regno == tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + i || regno == -1)
- regcache_collect (tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + i,
- regs + REG_FIXREG_OFFSET (i));
- }
-
- if (regno == tdep->ppc_lr_regnum || regno == -1)
- regcache_collect (tdep->ppc_lr_regnum, regs + REG_LR_OFFSET);
-
- if (regno == tdep->ppc_cr_regnum || regno == -1)
- regcache_collect (tdep->ppc_cr_regnum, regs + REG_CR_OFFSET);
-
- if (regno == tdep->ppc_xer_regnum || regno == -1)
- regcache_collect (tdep->ppc_xer_regnum, regs + REG_XER_OFFSET);
-
- if (regno == tdep->ppc_ctr_regnum || regno == -1)
- regcache_collect (tdep->ppc_ctr_regnum, regs + REG_CTR_OFFSET);
-
- if (regno == PC_REGNUM || regno == -1)
- regcache_collect (PC_REGNUM, regs + REG_PC_OFFSET);
-}
-
-void
-ppcnbsd_supply_fpreg (char *fpregs, int regno)
-{
- struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch);
- int i;
-
- /* FIXME: jimb/2004-05-05: Some PPC variants don't have floating
- point registers. Traditionally, GDB's register set has still
- listed the floating point registers for such machines, so this
- code is harmless. However, the new E500 port actually omits the
- floating point registers entirely from the register set --- they
- don't even have register numbers assigned to them.
-
- It's not clear to me how best to update this code, so this assert
- will alert the first person to encounter the NetBSD/E500
- combination to the problem. */
- gdb_assert (ppc_floating_point_unit_p (current_gdbarch));
-
- for (i = 0; i < ppc_num_fprs; i++)
- {
- if (regno == tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum + i || regno == -1)
- supply_register (tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum + i,
- fpregs + FPREG_FPR_OFFSET (i));
- }
-
- if (regno == tdep->ppc_fpscr_regnum || regno == -1)
- supply_register (tdep->ppc_fpscr_regnum, fpregs + FPREG_FPSCR_OFFSET);
-}