/* BFD back-end for Intel i860 COFF files.
- Copyright 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003
- Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ Copyright 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002,
+ 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Created mostly by substituting "860" for "386" in coff-i386.c
Harry Dolan <dolan@ssd.intel.com>, October 1995
{
reloc_howto_type *howto = reloc_entry->howto;
fprintf (stderr, _("Relocation `%s' not yet implemented\n"), howto->name);
+ return bfd_reloc_notsupported;
}
#ifndef PCRELOFFSET
BFD_ASSERT (h != NULL);
/* I think we *do* want to bypass this. If we don't, I have seen some data
- parameters get the wrong relcation address. If I link two versions
+ parameters get the wrong relocation address. If I link two versions
with and without this section bypassed and then do a binary comparison,
the addresses which are different can be looked up in the map. The
case in which this section has been bypassed has addresses which correspond
if (dst->r_symndx < 0 || dst->r_symndx >= obj_conv_table_size (abfd))
{
(*_bfd_error_handler)
- (_("%s: warning: illegal symbol index %ld in relocs"),
- bfd_archive_filename (abfd), dst->r_symndx);
+ (_("%B: warning: illegal symbol index %ld in relocs"),
+ abfd, dst->r_symndx);
cache_ptr->sym_ptr_ptr = bfd_abs_section_ptr->symbol_ptr_ptr;
ptr = NULL;
}