Below is a list of problems identified during the GDB 5.0 release
cycle. People hope to have these problems fixed in 5.1.
---
-
-RFD: infrun.c: No bpstat_stop_status call after proceed over break?
-http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00665.html
-
-GDB misses watchpoint triggers after proceeding over a breakpoint on
-x86 targets.
-
---
+-- 2001-03-08
-x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM (???)
-http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00803.html
+Update GDB's coding standard documentation. Known topics:
-This problem has been fixed, but a regression test still needs to be
-added to the testsuite:
-http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-05/msg00309.html
+ o alloca/malloc et.al.
-Mark
+ o typedef and structs
---
+ o ISO-C
-Can't build IRIX -> arm GDB.
-http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-04/msg00356.html
+and most likely also:
-David Whedon writes:
-> Now I'm building for an embedded arm target. If there is a way of turning
-> remote-rdi off, I couldn't find it. It looks like it gets built by default
-> in gdb/configure.tgt(line 58) Anyway, the build dies in
-> gdb/rdi-share/unixcomm.c. SERPORT1 et. al. never get defined because we
-> aren't one of the architectures supported.
-
---
-
-Problem with weak functions
-http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-05/msg00060.html
-
-Dan Nicolaescu writes:
-> It seems that gdb-4.95.1 does not display correctly the function when
-> stoping in weak functions.
->
-> It stops in a function that is defined as weak, not in the function
-> that is actually run...
-
---
-
-GDB 5.0 doesn't work on Linux/SPARC
-
---
-
-Thread support. Right now, as soon as a thread finishes and exits,
-you're hosed. This problem is reported once a week or so.
+ o include conventions
--
--
-Re: GDB 5.0.1?
-http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2000-07/msg00038.html
+x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM (???)
+http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00803.html
+
+This problem has been fixed, but a regression test still needs to be
+added to the testsuite:
+http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-05/msg00309.html
+
+Mark
+
+[The test has been submitted for approval - cagney]
+
+--
+
+RFD: infrun.c: No bpstat_stop_status call after proceed over break?
+http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00665.html
-Is the Solaris 8 x86 problem fixed? When you configure it, configure
-incorrectly determines that I have no curses.h. This causes mucho
-compilation errors later on.
+GDB misses watchpoint triggers after proceeding over a breakpoint on
+x86 targets.
-Simply editing the config.h to define CURSES_H fixes the problem, and
-then the build works fine.
+--
-The status for this problem:
+GDB 5.0 doesn't work on Linux/SPARC
-Solaris 8 x86 (PIII-560)
-gcc 2.95.2
+There are two parts to this.
-I had the same problem with several of the snapshots shortly before
-5.0 became official, and 5.0 has the same problem.
+ o GDB 5.0 doesn't work on GNU/Linux/SPARC32
-I sent some mail in about it long ago, and never saw a reply.
+ o GDB 5.0 doesn't work on the new target
+ GNU/Linux/SPARC64
-I haven't had time to figure it out myself, especially since I get all
-confused trying to figure out what configure does, I was happy to find
-the workaround.
+GDB does build on both these targets.
-Mike
+The first problem is the one that should be fixed.
--
Enable MI by default. Old code can be deleted after 5.1 is out.
+Issues:
+
+ o syntax change where a list would
+ look like:
+ [ foo=a, foo=b, foo=c ]
+ instead of
+ { foo=a, foo=b, foo=c }
+
+ o kill off the idea of a reverse
+ query.
+
+ o review test cases
+
+ o enable it
+
--
Pascal (Pierre Muller, David Taylor)
Indent -gnu ?
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00496.html
+[I think this has been merged, need to confirm - cagney]
+
--
Java (Anthony Green, David Taylor)
Patch: handle N_MAIN stab
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00527.html
---
+-- 2001-03-08
-[Comming...]
+Add CRIS target.
-Modify gdb to work correctly with Pascal.
-
---
-
-Revised UDP support (was: Re: [Fwd: [patch] UDP transport support])
-http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-04/msg00000.html
-
-(Broken) support for GDB's remote protocol across UDP is to be
-included in the follow-on release.
-
-It should be noted that UDP can only work when the [Gg] packet fits in
-a single UDP packet.
-
-There is also much debate over the merit of this.
+A predicate to this is the multi-arching of SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP(). A
+patch has been submitted.
--
The following code cleanups will hopefully be applied to GDB 5.1.
+-- 2001-03-08
+
+Resolve the status of all broken targets as identified by the MAINTAINERS
+file.
+
--
Change documentation to GFDL license.
--
-Delete macro TARGET_BYTE_ORDER_SELECTABLE.
-
-Patches in the database.
-
---
-
Fix copyright notices.
Turns out that ``1998-2000'' isn't considered valid :-(
--
-Purge PARAMS.
-
-Eliminate all uses of PARAMS in GDB's source code.
+ GDB 5.1 - Known Problems
+ ========================
--
-printcmd.c (print_address_numeric):
+z8k
-NOTE: This assumes that the significant address information is kept in
-the least significant bits of ADDR - the upper bits were either zero
-or sign extended. Should ADDRESS_TO_POINTER() or some
-ADDRESS_TO_PRINTABLE() be used to do the conversion?
+The z8k has suffered bit rot and is known to not build. The problem
+was occuring in the opcodes directory.
--
-Compiler warnings.
-
-Eliminate all warnings for at least one host/target for the flags:
--Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wparentheses
--Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized
+Solaris 8 x86 CURSES_H problem
+http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2000-07/msg00038.html
---
+The original problem was worked around with:
-Follow through `make check' with --enable-shared.
+ 2000-06-06 Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
-When the srcware tree is configured with --enable-shared, the `expect'
-program won't run properly. Jim Wilson found out gdb has a local hack
-to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but, AFAIK, no other project has been hacked
-similarly.
+ * configure.in: Enable autoconf to find curses.h on Solaris 2.8.
+ * configure: Regenerate.
-http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00845.html
+When building both GDB and SID using the same source tree the problem
+will still occure. sid/component/configure.in mis-configures
+<curses.h> and leaves wrong information in the config cache.
--
--
-Fix at least one thread bug.
+Thread support. Right now, as soon as a thread finishes and exits,
+you're hosed. This problem is reported once a week or so.
--
--
-Eliminate one more compiler warnings.
+Compiler warnings.
+
+Eliminate all warnings for at least one host/target for the flags:
+-Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wparentheses
+-Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized
--
The current convention is (kind of) to use $(<header>_h) in all
dependency lists. It isn't done in a consistent way.
+--
+
+ GDB 5.2 - Known Problems
+ ========================
+
--
Code Cleanups: General
--
+Revised UDP support (was: Re: [Fwd: [patch] UDP transport support])
+http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-04/msg00000.html
+
+(Broken) support for GDB's remote protocol across UDP is to be
+included in the follow-on release.
+
+It should be noted that UDP can only work when the [Gg] packet fits in
+a single UDP packet.
+
+There is also much debate over the merit of this.
+
+--
+
+Can't build IRIX -> arm GDB.
+http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-04/msg00356.html
+
+David Whedon writes:
+> Now I'm building for an embedded arm target. If there is a way of turning
+> remote-rdi off, I couldn't find it. It looks like it gets built by default
+> in gdb/configure.tgt(line 58) Anyway, the build dies in
+> gdb/rdi-share/unixcomm.c. SERPORT1 et. al. never get defined because we
+> aren't one of the architectures supported.
+
+--
+
+Problem with weak functions
+http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-05/msg00060.html
+
+Dan Nicolaescu writes:
+> It seems that gdb-4.95.1 does not display correctly the function when
+> stoping in weak functions.
+>
+> It stops in a function that is defined as weak, not in the function
+> that is actually run...
+
+--
+
+Follow through `make check' with --enable-shared.
+
+When the srcware tree is configured with --enable-shared, the `expect'
+program won't run properly. Jim Wilson found out gdb has a local hack
+to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but, AFAIK, no other project has been hacked
+similarly.
+
+http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00845.html
+
+--
+
+Delete macro TARGET_BYTE_ORDER_SELECTABLE.
+
+Patches in the database.
+
+--
+
+printcmd.c (print_address_numeric):
+
+NOTE: This assumes that the significant address information is kept in
+the least significant bits of ADDR - the upper bits were either zero
+or sign extended. Should ADDRESS_TO_POINTER() or some
+ADDRESS_TO_PRINTABLE() be used to do the conversion?
+
+--
+
The BFD directory requires bug-fixed AUTOMAKE et.al.
AUTOMAKE 1.4 incorrectly set the TEXINPUTS environment variable. It
exercised by the testsuite (as determined using some type of code
coverage analysis).
+--
+
+Replace the file gdb/CONTRIBUTE with a file that is generated from the
+gdb/doc/*.texinfo directory.
+
--
New Features and Fixes