/* Determine if TYPE is an access to an unconstrained array. */
-static bool
+bool
ada_is_access_to_unconstrained_array (struct type *type)
{
return (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_TYPEDEF
for (k = 0; k < arity; k += 1)
{
+ struct type *saved_elt_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (elt_type);
+
if (TYPE_CODE (elt_type) != TYPE_CODE_ARRAY)
error (_("too many subscripts (%d expected)"), k);
+
elt = value_subscript (elt, pos_atr (ind[k]));
+
+ if (ada_is_access_to_unconstrained_array (saved_elt_type)
+ && TYPE_CODE (value_type (elt)) != TYPE_CODE_TYPEDEF)
+ {
+ /* The element is a typedef to an unconstrained array,
+ except that the value_subscript call stripped the
+ typedef layer. The typedef layer is GNAT's way to
+ specify that the element is, at the source level, an
+ access to the unconstrained array, rather than the
+ unconstrained array. So, we need to restore that
+ typedef layer, which we can do by forcing the element's
+ type back to its original type. Otherwise, the returned
+ value is going to be printed as the array, rather
+ than as an access. Another symptom of the same issue
+ would be that an expression trying to dereference the
+ element would also be improperly rejected. */
+ deprecated_set_value_type (elt, saved_elt_type);
+ }
+
+ elt_type = ada_check_typedef (value_type (elt));
}
+
return elt;
}
{
struct type *t, *t1;
struct value *v;
+ int check_tag;
v = NULL;
t1 = t = ada_check_typedef (value_type (arg));
if (!find_struct_field (name, t1, 0,
&field_type, &byte_offset, &bit_offset,
&bit_size, NULL))
- t1 = ada_to_fixed_type (ada_get_base_type (t1), NULL,
- address, NULL, 1);
+ check_tag = 1;
+ else
+ check_tag = 0;
}
else
- t1 = ada_to_fixed_type (ada_get_base_type (t1), NULL,
- address, NULL, 1);
+ check_tag = 0;
+
+ /* Convert to fixed type in all cases, so that we have proper
+ offsets to each field in unconstrained record types. */
+ t1 = ada_to_fixed_type (ada_get_base_type (t1), NULL,
+ address, NULL, check_tag);
if (find_struct_field (name, t1, 0,
&field_type, &byte_offset, &bit_offset,