to pass to lookup_internalvar(). */
char *varname;
char *start = ++p;
- value_ptr val;
+ struct value *val;
while (isalnum (*p) || *p == '_')
p++;
{
struct frame_info *saved_frame;
int saved_level, within_current_scope;
- value_ptr mark = value_mark ();
- value_ptr v;
+ struct value *mark = value_mark ();
+ struct value *v;
/* Save the current frame and level so we can restore it after
evaluating the watchpoint expression on its own frame. */
&& b->enable_state == bp_enabled
&& !b->duplicate)
{
- value_ptr v, n;
+ struct value *v;
+ struct value *n;
b->inserted = (is == mark_inserted);
/* Walk down the saved value chain. */
static int
breakpoint_cond_eval (PTR exp)
{
- value_ptr mark = value_mark ();
+ struct value *mark = value_mark ();
int i = !value_true (evaluate_expression ((struct expression *) exp));
value_free_to_mark (mark);
return i;
reinit_frame_cache ();
fr = find_frame_addr_in_frame_chain (b->watchpoint_frame);
within_current_scope = (fr != NULL);
+ /* in_function_epilogue_p() returns a non-zero value if we're still
+ in the function but the stack frame has already been invalidated.
+ Since we can't rely on the values of local variables after the
+ stack has been destroyed, we are treating the watchpoint in that
+ state as `not changed' without further checking. */
+ if (within_current_scope && fr == get_current_frame ()
+ && gdbarch_in_function_epilogue_p (current_gdbarch, read_pc ()))
+ return WP_VALUE_NOT_CHANGED;
if (within_current_scope)
/* If we end up stopping, the current frame will get selected
in normal_stop. So this call to select_frame won't affect
call free_all_values. We can't call free_all_values because
we might be in the middle of evaluating a function call. */
- value_ptr mark = value_mark ();
- value_ptr new_val = evaluate_expression (bs->breakpoint_at->exp);
+ struct value *mark = value_mark ();
+ struct value *new_val = evaluate_expression (bs->breakpoint_at->exp);
if (!value_equal (b->val, new_val))
{
release_value (new_val);
b->type == bp_access_watchpoint)
{
CORE_ADDR addr;
- value_ptr v;
+ struct value *v;
int found = 0;
addr = target_stopped_data_address ();
};
static int
-do_captured_breakpoint_query (void *data)
+do_captured_breakpoint_query (struct ui_out *uiout, void *data)
{
struct captured_breakpoint_query_args *args = data;
register struct breakpoint *b;
}
enum gdb_rc
-gdb_breakpoint_query (/* output object, */ int bnum)
+gdb_breakpoint_query (struct ui_out *uiout, int bnum)
{
struct captured_breakpoint_query_args args;
args.bnum = bnum;
/* For the moment we don't trust print_one_breakpoint() to not throw
an error. */
- return catch_errors (do_captured_breakpoint_query, &args,
- NULL, RETURN_MASK_ALL);
+ return catch_exceptions (uiout, do_captured_breakpoint_query, &args,
+ NULL, RETURN_MASK_ALL);
}
/* Return non-zero if B is user settable (breakpoints, watchpoints,
if (blocks_searched[index] == 0)
{
struct block *b = BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bl, index);
- int nsyms;
register int i;
register struct symbol *sym;
- nsyms = BLOCK_NSYMS (b);
-
- for (i = 0; i < nsyms; i++)
+ ALL_BLOCK_SYMBOLS (b, i, sym)
{
- sym = BLOCK_SYM (b, i);
if (STREQ (SYMBOL_NAME (sym), "default"))
{
if (have_default)
delete_breakpoint (b);
return 0;
}
- /* In case we have a problem, disable this breakpoint. We'll restore
- its status if we succeed. */
+ /* HACK: cagney/2001-11-11: kettenis/2001-11-11: MarkK wrote:
+
+ ``And a hack it is, although Apple's Darwin version of GDB
+ contains an almost identical hack to implement a "future
+ break" command. It seems to work in many real world cases,
+ but it is easy to come up with a test case where the patch
+ doesn't help at all.''
+
+ ``It seems that the way GDB implements breakpoints - in -
+ shared - libraries was designed for a.out shared library
+ systems (SunOS 4) where shared libraries were loaded at a
+ fixed address in memory. Since ELF shared libraries can (and
+ will) be loaded at any address in memory, things break.
+ Fixing this is not trivial. Therefore, I'm not sure whether
+ we should add this hack to the branch only. I cannot
+ guarantee that things will be fixed on the trunk in the near
+ future.''
+
+ In case we have a problem, disable this breakpoint. We'll
+ restore its status if we succeed. Don't disable a
+ shlib_disabled breakpoint though. There's a fair chance we
+ can't re-set it if the shared library it's in hasn't been
+ loaded yet. */
save_enable = b->enable_state;
- b->enable_state = bp_disabled;
+ if (b->enable_state != bp_shlib_disabled)
+ b->enable_state = bp_disabled;
set_language (b->language);
input_radix = b->input_radix;