/* Helper routines for C++ support in GDB.
- Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Contributed by David Carlton and by Kealia, Inc.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
- Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
- Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
+ Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
+ Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. */
#include "defs.h"
#include "cp-support.h"
#include "gdbtypes.h"
#include "dictionary.h"
#include "command.h"
+#include "frame.h"
-/* When set, the file that we're processing seems to have debugging
- info for C++ namespaces, so cp-namespace.c shouldn't try to guess
- namespace info itself. */
+/* When set, the file that we're processing is known to have debugging
+ info for C++ namespaces. */
+
+/* NOTE: carlton/2004-01-13: No currently released version of GCC (the
+ latest of which is 3.3.x at the time of this writing) produces this
+ debug info. GCC 3.4 should, however. */
unsigned char processing_has_namespace_info;
-/* If processing_has_namespace_info is nonzero, this string should
- contain the name of the current namespace. The string is
- temporary; copy it if you need it. */
+/* This contains our best guess as to the name of the current
+ enclosing namespace(s)/class(es), if any. For example, if we're
+ within the method foo() in the following code:
-/* FIXME: carlton/2003-06-12: This isn't entirely reliable: currently,
- we get mislead by DW_AT_specification. */
+ namespace N {
+ class C {
+ void foo () {
+ }
+ };
+ }
-const char *processing_current_namespace;
+ then processing_current_prefix should be set to "N::C". If
+ processing_has_namespace_info is false, then this variable might
+ not be reliable. */
+
+const char *processing_current_prefix;
/* List of using directives that are active in the current file. */
struct symtab **symtab,
int anonymous_namespace);
+static struct type *cp_lookup_transparent_type_loop (const char *name,
+ const char *scope,
+ int scope_len);
+
static void initialize_namespace_symtab (struct objfile *objfile);
static struct block *get_possible_namespace_block (struct objfile *objfile);
if (SYMBOL_CPLUS_DEMANGLED_NAME (symbol) != NULL)
{
-#if 0
- /* FIXME: carlton/2003-06-12: As mentioned above,
- 'processing_has_namespace_info' currently isn't entirely
- reliable, so let's always use demangled names to get this
- information for now. */
-
if (processing_has_namespace_info)
{
block_set_scope
- (block, obsavestring (processing_current_namespace,
- strlen (processing_current_namespace),
+ (block, obsavestring (processing_current_prefix,
+ strlen (processing_current_prefix),
obstack),
obstack);
}
else
-#endif
{
/* Try to figure out the appropriate namespace from the
demangled name. */
cp_lookup_symbol_nonlocal.
For example, if we're within a function A::B::f and looking for a
- symbol f, this will get called with NAME = "f", SCOPE = "A::B", and
+ symbol x, this will get called with NAME = "x", SCOPE = "A::B", and
SCOPE_LEN = 0. It then calls itself with NAME and SCOPE the same,
but with SCOPE_LEN = 1. And then it calls itself with NAME and
SCOPE the same, but with SCOPE_LEN = 4. This third call looks for
class or namespace given by PARENT_TYPE, from within the context
given by BLOCK. Return NULL if there is no such nested type. */
-/* FIXME: carlton/2003-09-24: For now, this only works for nested
- namespaces; the patch to make this work on other sorts of nested
- types is next on my TODO list. */
-
struct type *
cp_lookup_nested_type (struct type *parent_type,
const char *nested_name,
{
switch (TYPE_CODE (parent_type))
{
+ case TYPE_CODE_STRUCT:
case TYPE_CODE_NAMESPACE:
{
+ /* NOTE: carlton/2003-11-10: We don't treat C++ class members
+ of classes like, say, data or function members. Instead,
+ they're just represented by symbols whose names are
+ qualified by the name of the surrounding class. This is
+ just like members of namespaces; in particular,
+ lookup_symbol_namespace works when looking them up. */
+
const char *parent_name = TYPE_TAG_NAME (parent_type);
struct symbol *sym = cp_lookup_symbol_namespace (parent_name,
nested_name,
}
default:
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
- "cp_lookup_nested_type called on a non-namespace.");
+ _("cp_lookup_nested_type called on a non-aggregate type."));
}
}
+/* The C++-version of lookup_transparent_type. */
+
+/* FIXME: carlton/2004-01-16: The problem that this is trying to
+ address is that, unfortunately, sometimes NAME is wrong: it may not
+ include the name of namespaces enclosing the type in question.
+ lookup_transparent_type gets called when the the type in question
+ is a declaration, and we're trying to find its definition; but, for
+ declarations, our type name deduction mechanism doesn't work.
+ There's nothing we can do to fix this in general, I think, in the
+ absence of debug information about namespaces (I've filed PR
+ gdb/1511 about this); until such debug information becomes more
+ prevalent, one heuristic which sometimes looks is to search for the
+ definition in namespaces containing the current namespace.
+
+ We should delete this functions once the appropriate debug
+ information becomes more widespread. (GCC 3.4 will be the first
+ released version of GCC with such information.) */
+
+struct type *
+cp_lookup_transparent_type (const char *name)
+{
+ /* First, try the honest way of looking up the definition. */
+ struct type *t = basic_lookup_transparent_type (name);
+ const char *scope;
+
+ if (t != NULL)
+ return t;
+
+ /* If that doesn't work and we're within a namespace, look there
+ instead. */
+ scope = block_scope (get_selected_block (0));
+
+ if (scope[0] == '\0')
+ return NULL;
+
+ return cp_lookup_transparent_type_loop (name, scope, 0);
+}
+
+/* Lookup the the type definition associated to NAME in
+ namespaces/classes containing SCOPE whose name is strictly longer
+ than LENGTH. LENGTH must be the index of the start of a
+ component of SCOPE. */
+
+static struct type *
+cp_lookup_transparent_type_loop (const char *name, const char *scope,
+ int length)
+{
+ int scope_length = length + cp_find_first_component (scope + length);
+ char *full_name;
+
+ /* If the current scope is followed by "::", look in the next
+ component. */
+ if (scope[scope_length] == ':')
+ {
+ struct type *retval
+ = cp_lookup_transparent_type_loop (name, scope, scope_length + 2);
+ if (retval != NULL)
+ return retval;
+ }
+
+ full_name = alloca (scope_length + 2 + strlen (name) + 1);
+ strncpy (full_name, scope, scope_length);
+ strncpy (full_name + scope_length, "::", 2);
+ strcpy (full_name + scope_length + 2, name);
+
+ return basic_lookup_transparent_type (full_name);
+}
+
/* Now come functions for dealing with symbols associated to
namespaces. (They're used to store the namespaces themselves, not
objects that live in the namespaces.) These symbols come in two
namespace_symtab->free_code = free_nothing;
namespace_symtab->dirname = NULL;
- bv = obstack_alloc (&objfile->symbol_obstack,
+ bv = obstack_alloc (&objfile->objfile_obstack,
sizeof (struct blockvector)
+ FIRST_LOCAL_BLOCK * sizeof (struct block *));
BLOCKVECTOR_NBLOCKS (bv) = FIRST_LOCAL_BLOCK + 1;
/* Allocate empty GLOBAL_BLOCK and STATIC_BLOCK. */
- bl = allocate_block (&objfile->symbol_obstack);
- BLOCK_DICT (bl) = dict_create_linear (&objfile->symbol_obstack,
+ bl = allocate_block (&objfile->objfile_obstack);
+ BLOCK_DICT (bl) = dict_create_linear (&objfile->objfile_obstack,
NULL);
BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, GLOBAL_BLOCK) = bl;
- bl = allocate_block (&objfile->symbol_obstack);
- BLOCK_DICT (bl) = dict_create_linear (&objfile->symbol_obstack,
+ bl = allocate_block (&objfile->objfile_obstack);
+ BLOCK_DICT (bl) = dict_create_linear (&objfile->objfile_obstack,
NULL);
BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, STATIC_BLOCK) = bl;
having a symtab/block for this purpose seems like the best
solution for now. */
- bl = allocate_block (&objfile->symbol_obstack);
+ bl = allocate_block (&objfile->objfile_obstack);
BLOCK_DICT (bl) = dict_create_hashed_expandable ();
BLOCKVECTOR_BLOCK (bv, FIRST_LOCAL_BLOCK) = bl;
struct objfile *objfile)
{
struct block *block = get_possible_namespace_block (objfile);
- char *name_copy = obsavestring (name, len, &objfile->symbol_obstack);
- struct symbol *sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name_copy, NULL,
- VAR_DOMAIN);
+ char *name_copy = alloca (len + 1);
+ struct symbol *sym;
+
+ memcpy (name_copy, name, len);
+ name_copy[len] = '\0';
+ sym = lookup_block_symbol (block, name_copy, NULL, VAR_DOMAIN);
if (sym == NULL)
{
- struct type *type = init_type (TYPE_CODE_NAMESPACE, 0, 0,
- name_copy, objfile);
+ struct type *type;
+ name_copy = obsavestring (name, len, &objfile->objfile_obstack);
+
+ type = init_type (TYPE_CODE_NAMESPACE, 0, 0, name_copy, objfile);
+
TYPE_TAG_NAME (type) = TYPE_NAME (type);
- sym = obstack_alloc (&objfile->symbol_obstack, sizeof (struct symbol));
+ sym = obstack_alloc (&objfile->objfile_obstack, sizeof (struct symbol));
memset (sym, 0, sizeof (struct symbol));
SYMBOL_LANGUAGE (sym) = language_cplus;
SYMBOL_SET_NAMES (sym, name_copy, len, objfile);
return 0;
}
else
- {
- obstack_free (&objfile->symbol_obstack, name_copy);
-
- return 1;
- }
+ return 1;
}
/* Look for a symbol named NAME in all the possible namespace blocks.
maintenance_cplus_namespace (char *args, int from_tty)
{
struct objfile *objfile;
- printf_unfiltered ("Possible namespaces:\n");
+ printf_unfiltered (_("Possible namespaces:\n"));
ALL_OBJFILES (objfile)
{
struct dict_iterator iter;
_initialize_cp_namespace (void)
{
add_cmd ("namespace", class_maintenance, maintenance_cplus_namespace,
- "Print the list of possible C++ namespaces.",
+ _("Print the list of possible C++ namespaces."),
&maint_cplus_cmd_list);
}