struct complaint unclaimed_bincl_complaint =
{"N_BINCL %s not in entries for any file, at symtab pos %d", 0, 0};
+
+struct complaint discarding_local_symbols_complaint =
+{"misplaced N_LBRAC entry; discarding local symbols which have no enclosing block", 0, 0};
\f
/* find_text_range --- find start and end of loadable code sections
do_cleanups (back_to);
}
+#ifdef SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING
+CORE_ADDR
+find_stab_function_addr (char *namestring, char *filename,
+ struct objfile *objfile)
+{
+ struct minimal_symbol *msym;
+ char *p;
+ int n;
+
+ p = strchr (namestring, ':');
+ if (p == NULL)
+ p = namestring;
+ n = p - namestring;
+ p = alloca (n + 2);
+ strncpy (p, namestring, n);
+ p[n] = 0;
+
+ msym = lookup_minimal_symbol (p, filename, objfile);
+ if (msym == NULL)
+ {
+ /* Sun Fortran appends an underscore to the minimal symbol name,
+ try again with an appended underscore if the minimal symbol
+ was not found. */
+ p[n] = '_';
+ p[n + 1] = 0;
+ msym = lookup_minimal_symbol (p, filename, objfile);
+ }
+
+ if (msym == NULL && filename != NULL)
+ {
+ /* Try again without the filename. */
+ p[n] = 0;
+ msym = lookup_minimal_symbol (p, NULL, objfile);
+ }
+ if (msym == NULL && filename != NULL)
+ {
+ /* And try again for Sun Fortran, but without the filename. */
+ p[n] = '_';
+ p[n + 1] = 0;
+ msym = lookup_minimal_symbol (p, NULL, objfile);
+ }
+
+ return msym == NULL ? 0 : SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msym);
+}
+#endif /* SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING */
+
/* Setup partial_symtab's describing each source file for which
debugging information is available. */
/* Can only use new->locals as local symbols here if we're in
gcc or on a machine that puts them before the lbrack. */
if (!VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK (desc, processing_gcc_compilation))
- local_symbols = new->locals;
+ {
+ if (local_symbols != NULL)
+ {
+ /* GCC development snapshots from March to December of
+ 2000 would output N_LSYM entries after N_LBRAC
+ entries. As a consequence, these symbols are simply
+ discarded. Complain if this is the case. Note that
+ there are some compilers which legitimately put local
+ symbols within an LBRAC/RBRAC block; this complaint
+ might also help sort out problems in which
+ VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK is incorrectly defined. */
+ complain (&discarding_local_symbols_complaint);
+ }
+ local_symbols = new->locals;
+ }
if (context_stack_depth
> !VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK (desc, processing_gcc_compilation))