store_unsigned_integer (addr, len, val);
}
\f
-/* Swap LEN bytes at BUFFER between target and host byte-order. */
-#define SWAP_FLOATING(buffer,len) \
- do \
- { \
- if (TARGET_BYTE_ORDER != HOST_BYTE_ORDER) \
- { \
- char tmp; \
- char *p = (char *)(buffer); \
- char *q = ((char *)(buffer)) + len - 1; \
- for (; p < q; p++, q--) \
- { \
- tmp = *q; \
- *q = *p; \
- *p = tmp; \
- } \
- } \
- } \
- while (0)
-
/* Extract a floating-point number from a target-order byte-stream at ADDR.
Returns the value as type DOUBLEST.
register_valid[i] = 1;
}
-/* read_register_bytes and write_register_bytes are generally a *BAD* idea.
- They are inefficient because they need to check for partial updates, which
- can only be done by scanning through all of the registers and seeing if the
- bytes that are being read/written fall inside of an invalid register. [The
- main reason this is necessary is that register sizes can vary, so a simple
- index won't suffice.] It is far better to call read_register_gen if you
- want to get at the raw register contents, as it only takes a regno as an
- argument, and therefore can't do a partial register update. It would also
- be good to have a write_register_gen for similar reasons.
-
- Prior to the recent fixes to check for partial updates, both read and
- write_register_bytes always checked to see if any registers were stale, and
- then called target_fetch_registers (-1) to update the whole set. This
- caused really slowed things down for remote targets. */
+/* read_register_bytes and write_register_bytes are generally a *BAD*
+ idea. They are inefficient because they need to check for partial
+ updates, which can only be done by scanning through all of the
+ registers and seeing if the bytes that are being read/written fall
+ inside of an invalid register. [The main reason this is necessary
+ is that register sizes can vary, so a simple index won't suffice.]
+ It is far better to call read_register_gen and write_register_gen
+ if you want to get at the raw register contents, as it only takes a
+ regno as an argument, and therefore can't do a partial register
+ update.
+
+ Prior to the recent fixes to check for partial updates, both read
+ and write_register_bytes always checked to see if any registers
+ were stale, and then called target_fetch_registers (-1) to update
+ the whole set. This caused really slowed things down for remote
+ targets. */
/* Copy INLEN bytes of consecutive data from registers
starting with the INREGBYTE'th byte of register data
for (regno = 0; regno < NUM_REGS; regno++)
{
int regstart, regend;
- int startin, endin;
if (register_valid[regno])
continue;
regstart = REGISTER_BYTE (regno);
regend = regstart + REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regno);
- startin = regstart >= inregbyte && regstart < inregend;
- endin = regend > inregbyte && regend <= inregend;
-
- if (!startin && !endin)
+ if (regend <= inregbyte || inregend <= regstart)
+ /* The range the user wants to read doesn't overlap with regno. */
continue;
/* We've found an invalid register where at least one byte will be read.
Update it from the target. */
-
target_fetch_registers (regno);
if (!register_valid[regno])
for (regno = 0; regno < NUM_REGS; regno++)
{
int regstart, regend;
- int startin, endin;
- char regbuf[MAX_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE];
regstart = REGISTER_BYTE (regno);
regend = regstart + REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regno);
- startin = regstart >= myregstart && regstart < myregend;
- endin = regend > myregstart && regend <= myregend;
+ /* Is this register completely outside the range the user is writing? */
+ if (myregend <= regstart || regend <= myregstart)
+ /* do nothing */ ;
- if (!startin && !endin)
- continue; /* Register is completely out of range */
+ /* Is this register completely within the range the user is writing? */
+ else if (myregstart <= regstart && regend <= myregend)
+ write_register_gen (regno, myaddr + (regstart - myregstart));
- if (startin && endin) /* register is completely in range */
+ /* The register partially overlaps the range being written. */
+ else
{
- write_register_gen (regno, myaddr + (regstart - myregstart));
- continue;
- }
+ char regbuf[MAX_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE];
+ /* What's the overlap between this register's bytes and
+ those the caller wants to write? */
+ int overlapstart = max (regstart, myregstart);
+ int overlapend = min (regend, myregend);
+
+ /* We may be doing a partial update of an invalid register.
+ Update it from the target before scribbling on it. */
+ read_register_gen (regno, regbuf);
- /* We may be doing a partial update of an invalid register. Update it
- from the target before scribbling on it. */
- read_register_gen (regno, regbuf);
-
- if (startin)
- memcpy (registers + regstart,
- myaddr + regstart - myregstart,
- myregend - regstart);
- else /* endin */
- memcpy (registers + myregstart,
- myaddr,
- regend - myregstart);
- target_store_registers (regno);
+ memcpy (registers + overlapstart,
+ myaddr + (overlapstart - myregstart),
+ overlapend - overlapstart);
+
+ target_store_registers (regno);
+ }
}
}
+
/* Return the raw contents of register REGNO, regarding it as an integer. */
/* This probably should be returning LONGEST rather than CORE_ADDR. */
#endif
CORE_ADDR
-generic_target_read_pc (pid)
+generic_target_read_pc (int pid)
{
#ifdef PC_REGNUM
if (PC_REGNUM >= 0)
CHECK_TYPEDEF (type);
len = TYPE_LENGTH (type);
+ /* Pointers on D10V are really only 16 bits, but we lie to gdb elsewhere... */
+ if (GDB_TARGET_IS_D10V && TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
+ len = 2;
+
VALUE_REGNO (v) = regnum;
num_storage_locs = (len > REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE (regnum) ?
memcpy (VALUE_CONTENTS_RAW (v), raw_buffer + VALUE_OFFSET (v), len);
}
+ if (GDB_TARGET_IS_D10V
+ && TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_PTR
+ && TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type)
+ && (TYPE_CODE (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type)) == TYPE_CODE_FUNC))
+ {
+ /* pointer to function */
+ unsigned long num;
+ unsigned short snum;
+ snum = (unsigned short) extract_unsigned_integer (VALUE_CONTENTS_RAW (v), 2);
+ num = D10V_MAKE_IADDR (snum);
+ store_address (VALUE_CONTENTS_RAW (v), 4, num);
+ }
+ else if (GDB_TARGET_IS_D10V
+ && TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
+ {
+ /* pointer to data */
+ unsigned long num;
+ unsigned short snum;
+ snum = (unsigned short) extract_unsigned_integer (VALUE_CONTENTS_RAW (v), 2);
+ num = D10V_MAKE_DADDR (snum);
+ store_address (VALUE_CONTENTS_RAW (v), 4, num);
+ }
+
return v;
}
\f