return (SYMBOL_TYPE (sym));
}
-/* Given a type TYPE, lookup the type of the component of type named
- NAME.
- If NOERR is nonzero, return zero if NAME is not suitably defined. */
+/* Given a type TYPE, lookup the type of the component of type named NAME.
+
+ TYPE can be either a struct or union, or a pointer or reference to a struct or
+ union. If it is a pointer or reference, its target type is automatically used.
+ Thus '.' and '->' are interchangable, as specified for the definitions of the
+ expression element types STRUCTOP_STRUCT and STRUCTOP_PTR.
+
+ If NOERR is nonzero, return zero if NAME is not suitably defined.
+ If NAME is the name of a baseclass type, return that type. */
struct type *
lookup_struct_elt_type (type, name, noerr)
int noerr;
{
int i;
+ char *typename;
if (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_PTR ||
TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_REF)
check_stub_type (type);
+#if 0
+ /* FIXME: This change put in by Michael seems incorrect for the case where
+ the structure tag name is the same as the member name. I.E. when doing
+ "ptype bell->bar" for "struct foo { int bar; int foo; } bell;"
+ Disabled by fnf. */
+ typename = type_name_no_tag (type);
+ if (typename != NULL && STREQ (typename, name))
+ return type;
+#endif
+
for (i = TYPE_NFIELDS (type) - 1; i >= TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type); i--)
{
char *t_field_name = TYPE_FIELD_NAME (type, i);
if (TYPE_VPTR_FIELDNO (type) < 0)
{
int i;
- for (i = 1; i < TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type); i++)
+
+ /* We must start at zero in case the first (and only) baseclass is
+ virtual (and hence we cannot share the table pointer). */
+ for (i = 0; i < TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type); i++)
{
fill_in_vptr_fieldno (TYPE_BASECLASS (type, i));
if (TYPE_VPTR_FIELDNO (TYPE_BASECLASS (type, i)) >= 0)