#include "gdbcmd.h"
#include "command.h"
#include "gdb_string.h"
+#include "infcall.h"
/* NOTE: cagney/2003-04-16: What's the future of this code?
value_arg_coerce (struct value *arg, struct type *param_type,
int is_prototyped)
{
- register struct type *arg_type = check_typedef (VALUE_TYPE (arg));
- register struct type *type
+ struct type *arg_type = check_typedef (VALUE_TYPE (arg));
+ struct type *type
= param_type ? check_typedef (param_type) : arg_type;
switch (TYPE_CODE (type))
/* Determine a function's address and its return type from its value.
Calls error() if the function is not valid for calling. */
-static CORE_ADDR
+CORE_ADDR
find_function_addr (struct value *function, struct type **retval_type)
{
- register struct type *ftype = check_typedef (VALUE_TYPE (function));
- register enum type_code code = TYPE_CODE (ftype);
+ struct type *ftype = check_typedef (VALUE_TYPE (function));
+ enum type_code code = TYPE_CODE (ftype);
struct type *value_type;
CORE_ADDR funaddr;
if (TYPE_CODE (ftype) == TYPE_CODE_FUNC
|| TYPE_CODE (ftype) == TYPE_CODE_METHOD)
{
- funaddr = CONVERT_FROM_FUNC_PTR_ADDR (funaddr);
+ funaddr = gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (current_gdbarch,
+ funaddr,
+ ¤t_target);
value_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (ftype);
}
else
breakpoint_auto_delete (*(bpstat *) arg);
}
+static CORE_ADDR
+legacy_push_dummy_code (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
+ CORE_ADDR sp, CORE_ADDR funaddr, int using_gcc,
+ struct value **args, int nargs,
+ struct type *value_type,
+ CORE_ADDR *real_pc, CORE_ADDR *bp_addr)
+{
+ /* CALL_DUMMY is an array of words (DEPRECATED_REGISTER_SIZE), but
+ each word is in host byte order. Before calling
+ DEPRECATED_FIX_CALL_DUMMY, we byteswap it and remove any extra
+ bytes which might exist because ULONGEST is bigger than
+ DEPRECATED_REGISTER_SIZE. */
+ /* NOTE: This is pretty wierd, as the call dummy is actually a
+ sequence of instructions. But CISC machines will have to pack
+ the instructions into DEPRECATED_REGISTER_SIZE units (and so will
+ RISC machines for which INSTRUCTION_SIZE is not
+ DEPRECATED_REGISTER_SIZE). */
+ /* NOTE: This is pretty stupid. CALL_DUMMY should be in strict
+ target byte order. */
+ CORE_ADDR start_sp;
+ ULONGEST *dummy = alloca (DEPRECATED_SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS);
+ int sizeof_dummy1 = (DEPRECATED_REGISTER_SIZE
+ * DEPRECATED_SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS
+ / sizeof (ULONGEST));
+ char *dummy1 = alloca (sizeof_dummy1);
+ memcpy (dummy, DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS,
+ DEPRECATED_SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS);
+ if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
+ {
+ /* Stack grows down */
+ sp -= sizeof_dummy1;
+ start_sp = sp;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Stack grows up */
+ start_sp = sp;
+ sp += sizeof_dummy1;
+ }
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2002-09-10: Don't bother re-adjusting the stack
+ after allocating space for the call dummy. A target can specify
+ a SIZEOF_DUMMY1 (via DEPRECATED_SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS) such
+ that all local alignment requirements are met. */
+ /* Create a call sequence customized for this function and the
+ number of arguments for it. */
+ {
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < (int) (DEPRECATED_SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS / sizeof (dummy[0]));
+ i++)
+ store_unsigned_integer (&dummy1[i * DEPRECATED_REGISTER_SIZE],
+ DEPRECATED_REGISTER_SIZE,
+ (ULONGEST) dummy[i]);
+ }
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-04-22: This computation of REAL_PC, BP_ADDR and
+ DUMMY_ADDR is pretty messed up. It comes from constant tinkering
+ with the values. Instead a DEPRECATED_FIX_CALL_DUMMY replacement
+ (PUSH_DUMMY_BREAKPOINT?) should just do everything. */
+#ifdef GDB_TARGET_IS_HPPA
+ (*real_pc) = DEPRECATED_FIX_CALL_DUMMY (dummy1, start_sp, funaddr, nargs,
+ args, value_type, using_gcc);
+#else
+ if (DEPRECATED_FIX_CALL_DUMMY_P ())
+ {
+ /* gdb_assert (CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION == ON_STACK) true? */
+ DEPRECATED_FIX_CALL_DUMMY (dummy1, start_sp, funaddr, nargs, args,
+ value_type, using_gcc);
+ }
+ (*real_pc) = start_sp;
+#endif
+ /* Yes, the offset is applied to the real_pc and not the dummy addr.
+ Ulgh! Blame the HP/UX target. */
+ (*bp_addr) = (*real_pc) + DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_BREAKPOINT_OFFSET;
+ /* Yes, the offset is applied to the real_pc and not the
+ dummy_addr. Ulgh! Blame the HP/UX target. */
+ (*real_pc) += DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_START_OFFSET;
+ write_memory (start_sp, (char *) dummy1, sizeof_dummy1);
+ if (DEPRECATED_USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES)
+ generic_save_call_dummy_addr (start_sp, start_sp + sizeof_dummy1);
+ return sp;
+}
+
+static CORE_ADDR
+generic_push_dummy_code (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
+ CORE_ADDR sp, CORE_ADDR funaddr, int using_gcc,
+ struct value **args, int nargs,
+ struct type *value_type,
+ CORE_ADDR *real_pc, CORE_ADDR *bp_addr)
+{
+ /* Something here to findout the size of a breakpoint and then
+ allocate space for it on the stack. */
+ int bplen;
+ /* This code assumes frame align. */
+ gdb_assert (gdbarch_frame_align_p (gdbarch));
+ /* Force the stack's alignment. The intent is to ensure that the SP
+ is aligned to at least a breakpoint instruction's boundary. */
+ sp = gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, sp);
+ /* Allocate space for, and then position the breakpoint on the
+ stack. */
+ if (gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, 1, 2))
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR bppc = sp;
+ gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc (gdbarch, &bppc, &bplen);
+ sp = gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, sp - bplen);
+ (*bp_addr) = sp;
+ /* Should the breakpoint size/location be re-computed here? */
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ (*bp_addr) = sp;
+ gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc (gdbarch, bp_addr, &bplen);
+ sp = gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, sp + bplen);
+ }
+ /* Inferior resumes at the function entry point. */
+ (*real_pc) = funaddr;
+ return sp;
+}
+
+/* Provide backward compatibility. Once DEPRECATED_FIX_CALL_DUMMY is
+ eliminated, this can be simplified. */
+
+static CORE_ADDR
+push_dummy_code (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
+ CORE_ADDR sp, CORE_ADDR funaddr, int using_gcc,
+ struct value **args, int nargs,
+ struct type *value_type,
+ CORE_ADDR *real_pc, CORE_ADDR *bp_addr)
+{
+ if (gdbarch_push_dummy_code_p (gdbarch))
+ return gdbarch_push_dummy_code (gdbarch, sp, funaddr, using_gcc,
+ args, nargs, value_type, real_pc, bp_addr);
+ else if (DEPRECATED_FIX_CALL_DUMMY_P ())
+ return legacy_push_dummy_code (gdbarch, sp, funaddr, using_gcc,
+ args, nargs, value_type, real_pc, bp_addr);
+ else
+ return generic_push_dummy_code (gdbarch, sp, funaddr, using_gcc,
+ args, nargs, value_type, real_pc, bp_addr);
+}
+
/* All this stuff with a dummy frame may seem unnecessarily complicated
(why not just save registers in GDB?). The purpose of pushing a dummy
frame which looks just like a real frame is so that if you call a
struct value *
call_function_by_hand (struct value *function, int nargs, struct value **args)
{
- register CORE_ADDR sp;
- register int i;
- int rc;
- CORE_ADDR start_sp;
- /* CALL_DUMMY is an array of words (REGISTER_SIZE), but each word
- is in host byte order. Before calling FIX_CALL_DUMMY, we byteswap it
- and remove any extra bytes which might exist because ULONGEST is
- bigger than REGISTER_SIZE.
-
- NOTE: This is pretty wierd, as the call dummy is actually a
- sequence of instructions. But CISC machines will have
- to pack the instructions into REGISTER_SIZE units (and
- so will RISC machines for which INSTRUCTION_SIZE is not
- REGISTER_SIZE).
-
- NOTE: This is pretty stupid. CALL_DUMMY should be in strict
- target byte order. */
-
- static ULONGEST *dummy;
- int sizeof_dummy1;
- char *dummy1;
+ CORE_ADDR sp;
CORE_ADDR dummy_addr;
- CORE_ADDR old_sp;
struct type *value_type;
unsigned char struct_return;
CORE_ADDR struct_addr = 0;
struct type *ftype = check_typedef (SYMBOL_TYPE (function));
CORE_ADDR bp_addr;
- dummy = alloca (SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS);
- sizeof_dummy1 = REGISTER_SIZE * SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS / sizeof (ULONGEST);
- dummy1 = alloca (sizeof_dummy1);
- memcpy (dummy, CALL_DUMMY_WORDS, SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS);
-
if (!target_has_execution)
noprocess ();
vector. Hence this direct call.
A follow-on change is to modify this interface so that it takes
- thread OR frame OR tpid as a parameter, and returns a dummy
+ thread OR frame OR ptid as a parameter, and returns a dummy
frame handle. The handle can then be used further down as a
- parameter SAVE_DUMMY_FRAME_TOS. Hmm, thinking about it, since
- everything is ment to be using generic dummy frames, why not
- even use some of the dummy frame code to here - do a regcache
- dup and then pass the duped regcache, along with all the other
- stuff, at one single point.
+ parameter to generic_save_dummy_frame_tos(). Hmm, thinking
+ about it, since everything is ment to be using generic dummy
+ frames, why not even use some of the dummy frame code to here -
+ do a regcache dup and then pass the duped regcache, along with
+ all the other stuff, at one single point.
In fact, you can even save the structure's return address in the
dummy frame and fix one of those nasty lost struct return edge
generic_push_dummy_frame ();
}
- old_sp = read_sp ();
-
/* Ensure that the initial SP is correctly aligned. */
- if (gdbarch_frame_align_p (current_gdbarch))
- {
- /* NOTE: cagney/2002-09-18:
-
- On a RISC architecture, a void parameterless generic dummy
- frame (i.e., no parameters, no result) typically does not
- need to push anything the stack and hence can leave SP and
- FP. Similarly, a framelss (possibly leaf) function does not
- push anything on the stack and, hence, that too can leave FP
- and SP unchanged. As a consequence, a sequence of void
- parameterless generic dummy frame calls to frameless
- functions will create a sequence of effectively identical
- frames (SP, FP and TOS and PC the same). This, not
- suprisingly, results in what appears to be a stack in an
- infinite loop --- when GDB tries to find a generic dummy
- frame on the internal dummy frame stack, it will always find
- the first one.
-
- To avoid this problem, the code below always grows the stack.
- That way, two dummy frames can never be identical. It does
- burn a few bytes of stack but that is a small price to pay
- :-). */
- sp = gdbarch_frame_align (current_gdbarch, old_sp);
- if (sp == old_sp)
- {
- if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
- /* Stack grows down. */
- sp = gdbarch_frame_align (current_gdbarch, old_sp - 1);
- else
- /* Stack grows up. */
- sp = gdbarch_frame_align (current_gdbarch, old_sp + 1);
- }
- gdb_assert ((INNER_THAN (1, 2) && sp <= old_sp)
- || (INNER_THAN (2, 1) && sp >= old_sp));
- }
- else
- /* FIXME: cagney/2002-09-18: Hey, you loose! Who knows how badly
- aligned the SP is! Further, per comment above, if the generic
- dummy frame ends up empty (because nothing is pushed) GDB won't
- be able to correctly perform back traces. If a target is
- having trouble with backtraces, first thing to do is add
- FRAME_ALIGN() to its architecture vector. After that, try
- adding SAVE_DUMMY_FRAME_TOS() and modifying
- DEPRECATED_FRAME_CHAIN so that when the next outer frame is a
- generic dummy, it returns the current frame's base. */
- sp = old_sp;
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR old_sp = read_sp ();
+ if (gdbarch_frame_align_p (current_gdbarch))
+ {
+ sp = gdbarch_frame_align (current_gdbarch, old_sp);
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-08-13: Skip the "red zone". For some
+ ABIs, a function can use memory beyond the inner most stack
+ address. AMD64 called that region the "red zone". Skip at
+ least the "red zone" size before allocating any space on
+ the stack. */
+ if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
+ sp -= gdbarch_frame_red_zone_size (current_gdbarch);
+ else
+ sp += gdbarch_frame_red_zone_size (current_gdbarch);
+ /* Still aligned? */
+ gdb_assert (sp == gdbarch_frame_align (current_gdbarch, sp));
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2002-09-18:
+
+ On a RISC architecture, a void parameterless generic dummy
+ frame (i.e., no parameters, no result) typically does not
+ need to push anything the stack and hence can leave SP and
+ FP. Similarly, a frameless (possibly leaf) function does
+ not push anything on the stack and, hence, that too can
+ leave FP and SP unchanged. As a consequence, a sequence of
+ void parameterless generic dummy frame calls to frameless
+ functions will create a sequence of effectively identical
+ frames (SP, FP and TOS and PC the same). This, not
+ suprisingly, results in what appears to be a stack in an
+ infinite loop --- when GDB tries to find a generic dummy
+ frame on the internal dummy frame stack, it will always
+ find the first one.
+
+ To avoid this problem, the code below always grows the
+ stack. That way, two dummy frames can never be identical.
+ It does burn a few bytes of stack but that is a small price
+ to pay :-). */
+ if (sp == old_sp)
+ {
+ if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
+ /* Stack grows down. */
+ sp = gdbarch_frame_align (current_gdbarch, old_sp - 1);
+ else
+ /* Stack grows up. */
+ sp = gdbarch_frame_align (current_gdbarch, old_sp + 1);
+ }
+ gdb_assert ((INNER_THAN (1, 2) && sp <= old_sp)
+ || (INNER_THAN (2, 1) && sp >= old_sp));
+ }
+ else
+ /* FIXME: cagney/2002-09-18: Hey, you loose!
- if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
- {
- /* Stack grows down */
- sp -= sizeof_dummy1;
- start_sp = sp;
- }
- else
- {
- /* Stack grows up */
- start_sp = sp;
- sp += sizeof_dummy1;
- }
+ Who knows how badly aligned the SP is!
- /* NOTE: cagney/2002-09-10: Don't bother re-adjusting the stack
- after allocating space for the call dummy. A target can specify
- a SIZEOF_DUMMY1 (via SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS) such that all local
- alignment requirements are met. */
+ If the generic dummy frame ends up empty (because nothing is
+ pushed) GDB won't be able to correctly perform back traces.
+ If a target is having trouble with backtraces, first thing to
+ do is add FRAME_ALIGN() to the architecture vector. If that
+ fails, try unwind_dummy_id().
+
+ If the ABI specifies a "Red Zone" (see the doco) the code
+ below will quietly trash it. */
+ sp = old_sp;
+ }
funaddr = find_function_addr (function, &value_type);
CHECK_TYPEDEF (value_type);
/* Are we returning a value using a structure return or a normal
value return? */
- struct_return = using_struct_return (function, funaddr, value_type,
- using_gcc);
+ struct_return = using_struct_return (value_type, using_gcc);
- /* Create a call sequence customized for this function
- and the number of arguments for it. */
- for (i = 0; i < (int) (SIZEOF_CALL_DUMMY_WORDS / sizeof (dummy[0])); i++)
- store_unsigned_integer (&dummy1[i * REGISTER_SIZE],
- REGISTER_SIZE,
- (ULONGEST) dummy[i]);
+ /* Determine the location of the breakpoint (and possibly other
+ stuff) that the called function will return to. The SPARC, for a
+ function returning a structure or union, needs to make space for
+ not just the breakpoint but also an extra word containing the
+ size (?) of the structure being passed. */
+
+ /* The actual breakpoint (at BP_ADDR) is inserted separatly so there
+ is no need to write that out. */
switch (CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION)
{
case ON_STACK:
- /* NOTE: cagney/2003-04-22: This computation of REAL_PC, BP_ADDR
- and DUMMY_ADDR is pretty messed up. It comes from constant
- tinkering with the values. Instead a FIX_CALL_DUMMY
- replacement (PUSH_DUMMY_BREAKPOINT?) should just do
- everything. */
-#ifdef GDB_TARGET_IS_HPPA
- real_pc = FIX_CALL_DUMMY (dummy1, start_sp, funaddr, nargs, args,
- value_type, using_gcc);
-#else
- if (FIX_CALL_DUMMY_P ())
+ /* "dummy_addr" is here just to keep old targets happy. New
+ targets return that same information via "sp" and "bp_addr". */
+ if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
- /* gdb_assert (CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION == ON_STACK) true? */
- FIX_CALL_DUMMY (dummy1, start_sp, funaddr, nargs, args, value_type,
- using_gcc);
+ sp = push_dummy_code (current_gdbarch, sp, funaddr,
+ using_gcc, args, nargs, value_type,
+ &real_pc, &bp_addr);
+ dummy_addr = sp;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ dummy_addr = sp;
+ sp = push_dummy_code (current_gdbarch, sp, funaddr,
+ using_gcc, args, nargs, value_type,
+ &real_pc, &bp_addr);
}
- real_pc = start_sp;
-#endif
- dummy_addr = start_sp;
- /* Yes, the offset is applied to the real_pc and not the dummy
- addr. Ulgh! Blame the HP/UX target. */
- bp_addr = real_pc + CALL_DUMMY_BREAKPOINT_OFFSET;
- /* Yes, the offset is applied to the real_pc and not the
- dummy_addr. Ulgh! Blame the HP/UX target. */
- real_pc += CALL_DUMMY_START_OFFSET;
- write_memory (start_sp, (char *) dummy1, sizeof_dummy1);
- if (DEPRECATED_USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES)
- generic_save_call_dummy_addr (start_sp, start_sp + sizeof_dummy1);
break;
case AT_ENTRY_POINT:
+ if (DEPRECATED_FIX_CALL_DUMMY_P ())
+ {
+ /* Sigh. Some targets use DEPRECATED_FIX_CALL_DUMMY to
+ shove extra stuff onto the stack or into registers. That
+ code should be in PUSH_DUMMY_CALL, however, in the mean
+ time ... */
+ /* If the target is manipulating DUMMY1, it looses big time. */
+ void *dummy1 = NULL;
+ DEPRECATED_FIX_CALL_DUMMY (dummy1, sp, funaddr, nargs, args,
+ value_type, using_gcc);
+ }
real_pc = funaddr;
- dummy_addr = CALL_DUMMY_ADDRESS ();
+ dummy_addr = entry_point_address ();
+ if (DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_ADDRESS_P ())
+ /* Override it. */
+ dummy_addr = DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_ADDRESS ();
+ /* Make certain that the address points at real code, and not a
+ function descriptor. */
+ dummy_addr = gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (current_gdbarch,
+ dummy_addr,
+ ¤t_target);
/* A call dummy always consists of just a single breakpoint, so
it's address is the same as the address of the dummy. */
bp_addr = dummy_addr;
- if (DEPRECATED_USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES)
- /* NOTE: cagney/2002-04-13: The entry point is going to be
- modified with a single breakpoint. */
- generic_save_call_dummy_addr (CALL_DUMMY_ADDRESS (),
- CALL_DUMMY_ADDRESS () + 1);
break;
+ case AT_SYMBOL:
+ /* Some executables define a symbol __CALL_DUMMY_ADDRESS whose
+ address is the location where the breakpoint should be
+ placed. Once all targets are using the overhauled frame code
+ this can be deleted - ON_STACK is a better option. */
+ {
+ struct minimal_symbol *sym;
+
+ sym = lookup_minimal_symbol ("__CALL_DUMMY_ADDRESS", NULL, NULL);
+ real_pc = funaddr;
+ if (sym)
+ dummy_addr = SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (sym);
+ else
+ dummy_addr = entry_point_address ();
+ /* Make certain that the address points at real code, and not
+ a function descriptor. */
+ dummy_addr = gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (current_gdbarch,
+ dummy_addr,
+ ¤t_target);
+ /* A call dummy always consists of just a single breakpoint,
+ so it's address is the same as the address of the dummy. */
+ bp_addr = dummy_addr;
+ break;
+ }
default:
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, "bad switch");
}
-#ifdef lint
- sp = old_sp; /* It really is used, for some ifdef's... */
-#endif
+ if (DEPRECATED_USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES)
+ /* Save where the breakpoint is going to be inserted so that the
+ dummy-frame code is later able to re-identify it. */
+ generic_save_call_dummy_addr (bp_addr, bp_addr + 1);
if (nargs < TYPE_NFIELDS (ftype))
error ("too few arguments in function call");
- for (i = nargs - 1; i >= 0; i--)
- {
- int prototyped;
- struct type *param_type;
-
- /* FIXME drow/2002-05-31: Should just always mark methods as
- prototyped. Can we respect TYPE_VARARGS? Probably not. */
- if (TYPE_CODE (ftype) == TYPE_CODE_METHOD)
- prototyped = 1;
- else if (i < TYPE_NFIELDS (ftype))
- prototyped = TYPE_PROTOTYPED (ftype);
- else
- prototyped = 0;
-
- if (i < TYPE_NFIELDS (ftype))
- param_type = TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (ftype, i);
- else
- param_type = NULL;
-
- args[i] = value_arg_coerce (args[i], param_type, prototyped);
-
- /* elz: this code is to handle the case in which the function to
- be called has a pointer to function as parameter and the
- corresponding actual argument is the address of a function
- and not a pointer to function variable. In aCC compiled
- code, the calls through pointers to functions (in the body of
- the function called by hand) are made via $$dyncall_external
- which requires some registers setting, this is taken care of
- if we call via a function pointer variable, but not via a
- function address. In cc this is not a problem. */
+ {
+ int i;
+ for (i = nargs - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+ {
+ int prototyped;
+ struct type *param_type;
+
+ /* FIXME drow/2002-05-31: Should just always mark methods as
+ prototyped. Can we respect TYPE_VARARGS? Probably not. */
+ if (TYPE_CODE (ftype) == TYPE_CODE_METHOD)
+ prototyped = 1;
+ else if (i < TYPE_NFIELDS (ftype))
+ prototyped = TYPE_PROTOTYPED (ftype);
+ else
+ prototyped = 0;
- if (using_gcc == 0)
- {
- if (param_type != NULL && TYPE_CODE (ftype) != TYPE_CODE_METHOD)
- {
- /* if this parameter is a pointer to function. */
- if (TYPE_CODE (param_type) == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
- if (TYPE_CODE (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (param_type)) == TYPE_CODE_FUNC)
- /* elz: FIXME here should go the test about the
- compiler used to compile the target. We want to
- issue the error message only if the compiler used
- was HP's aCC. If we used HP's cc, then there is
- no problem and no need to return at this point. */
- /* Go see if the actual parameter is a variable of
- type pointer to function or just a function. */
- if (args[i]->lval == not_lval)
- {
- char *arg_name;
- if (find_pc_partial_function ((CORE_ADDR) args[i]->aligner.contents[0], &arg_name, NULL, NULL))
- error ("\
+ if (i < TYPE_NFIELDS (ftype))
+ param_type = TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (ftype, i);
+ else
+ param_type = NULL;
+
+ args[i] = value_arg_coerce (args[i], param_type, prototyped);
+
+ /* elz: this code is to handle the case in which the function
+ to be called has a pointer to function as parameter and the
+ corresponding actual argument is the address of a function
+ and not a pointer to function variable. In aCC compiled
+ code, the calls through pointers to functions (in the body
+ of the function called by hand) are made via
+ $$dyncall_external which requires some registers setting,
+ this is taken care of if we call via a function pointer
+ variable, but not via a function address. In cc this is
+ not a problem. */
+
+ if (using_gcc == 0)
+ {
+ if (param_type != NULL && TYPE_CODE (ftype) != TYPE_CODE_METHOD)
+ {
+ /* if this parameter is a pointer to function. */
+ if (TYPE_CODE (param_type) == TYPE_CODE_PTR)
+ if (TYPE_CODE (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (param_type)) == TYPE_CODE_FUNC)
+ /* elz: FIXME here should go the test about the
+ compiler used to compile the target. We want to
+ issue the error message only if the compiler
+ used was HP's aCC. If we used HP's cc, then
+ there is no problem and no need to return at
+ this point. */
+ /* Go see if the actual parameter is a variable of
+ type pointer to function or just a function. */
+ if (args[i]->lval == not_lval)
+ {
+ char *arg_name;
+ if (find_pc_partial_function ((CORE_ADDR) args[i]->aligner.contents[0], &arg_name, NULL, NULL))
+ error ("\
You cannot use function <%s> as argument. \n\
You must use a pointer to function type variable. Command ignored.", arg_name);
- }
- }
- }
- }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
- if (REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR_P ())
+ if (DEPRECATED_REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR_P ())
{
+ int i;
/* This is a machine like the sparc, where we may need to pass a
pointer to the structure, not the structure itself. */
for (i = nargs - 1; i >= 0; i--)
|| (TYPE_CODE (arg_type) == TYPE_CODE_FLT
&& TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type) > 8)
)
- && REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR (using_gcc, arg_type))
+ && DEPRECATED_REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR (using_gcc, arg_type))
{
CORE_ADDR addr;
int len; /* = TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type); */
arg_type = check_typedef (VALUE_ENCLOSING_TYPE (args[i]));
len = TYPE_LENGTH (arg_type);
- if (STACK_ALIGN_P ())
+ if (DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN_P ())
/* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this
stack_align code is really broken. Better to let
PUSH_ARGUMENTS adjust the stack in a target-defined
manner. */
- aligned_len = STACK_ALIGN (len);
+ aligned_len = DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN (len);
else
aligned_len = len;
if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
if (struct_return)
{
int len = TYPE_LENGTH (value_type);
- if (STACK_ALIGN_P ())
+ if (DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN_P ())
/* NOTE: cagney/2003-03-22: Should rely on frame align, rather
than stack align to force the alignment of the stack. */
- len = STACK_ALIGN (len);
+ len = DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN (len);
if (INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* Stack grows downward. Align STRUCT_ADDR and SP after
/* elz: on HPPA no need for this extra alignment, maybe it is needed
on other architectures. This is because all the alignment is
- taken care of in the above code (ifdef REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR) and
- in hppa_push_arguments */
+ taken care of in the above code (ifdef DEPRECATED_REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR)
+ and in hppa_push_arguments */
/* NOTE: cagney/2003-03-24: The below code is very broken. Given an
odd sized parameter the below will mis-align the stack. As was
suggested back in '96, better to let PUSH_ARGUMENTS handle it. */
/* MVS 11/22/96: I think at least some of this stack_align code
is really broken. Better to let push_dummy_call() adjust the
stack in a target-defined manner. */
- if (STACK_ALIGN_P () && INNER_THAN (1, 2))
+ if (DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN_P () && INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* If stack grows down, we must leave a hole at the top. */
int len = 0;
-
+ int i;
for (i = nargs - 1; i >= 0; i--)
len += TYPE_LENGTH (VALUE_ENCLOSING_TYPE (args[i]));
if (DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST_P ())
len += DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST;
- sp -= STACK_ALIGN (len) - len;
+ sp -= DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN (len) - len;
}
}
/* When there is no push_dummy_call method, should this code
simply error out. That would the implementation of this method
for all ABIs (which is probably a good thing). */
- sp = gdbarch_push_dummy_call (current_gdbarch, current_regcache,
- dummy_addr, nargs, args, sp, struct_return,
+ sp = gdbarch_push_dummy_call (current_gdbarch, funaddr, current_regcache,
+ bp_addr, nargs, args, sp, struct_return,
struct_addr);
else if (DEPRECATED_PUSH_ARGUMENTS_P ())
/* Keep old targets working. */
handled any alignment issues, the code below is entirely
redundant. */
if (!gdbarch_push_dummy_call_p (current_gdbarch)
- && STACK_ALIGN_P () && !INNER_THAN (1, 2))
+ && DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN_P () && !INNER_THAN (1, 2))
{
/* If stack grows up, we must leave a hole at the bottom, note
that sp already has been advanced for the arguments! */
if (DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST_P ())
sp += DEPRECATED_CALL_DUMMY_STACK_ADJUST;
- sp = STACK_ALIGN (sp);
+ sp = DEPRECATED_STACK_ALIGN (sp);
}
/* XXX This seems wrong. For stacks that grow down we shouldn't do
if (struct_return && DEPRECATED_STORE_STRUCT_RETURN_P ())
DEPRECATED_STORE_STRUCT_RETURN (struct_addr, sp);
- /* Write the stack pointer. This is here because the statements above
- might fool with it. On SPARC, this write also stores the register
- window into the right place in the new stack frame, which otherwise
- wouldn't happen. (See store_inferior_registers in sparc-nat.c.) */
- /* NOTE: cagney/2003-03-23: Disable this code when there is a
- push_dummy_call() method. Since that method will have already
- stored the stack pointer (as part of creating the fake call
- frame), and none of the code following that code adjusts the
- stack-pointer value, the below call is entirely redundant. */
+ /* Write the stack pointer. This is here because the statements
+ above might fool with it. On SPARC, this write also stores the
+ register window into the right place in the new stack frame,
+ which otherwise wouldn't happen (see store_inferior_registers in
+ sparc-nat.c). */
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-03-23: Since the architecture method
+ push_dummy_call() should have already stored the stack pointer
+ (as part of creating the fake call frame), and none of the code
+ following that call adjusts the stack-pointer value, the below
+ call is entirely redundant. */
if (DEPRECATED_DUMMY_WRITE_SP_P ())
DEPRECATED_DUMMY_WRITE_SP (sp);
- if (SAVE_DUMMY_FRAME_TOS_P ())
- SAVE_DUMMY_FRAME_TOS (sp);
+ if (gdbarch_unwind_dummy_id_p (current_gdbarch))
+ {
+ /* Sanity. The exact same SP value is returned by
+ PUSH_DUMMY_CALL, saved as the dummy-frame TOS, and used by
+ unwind_dummy_id to form the frame ID's stack address. */
+ gdb_assert (DEPRECATED_USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES);
+ generic_save_dummy_frame_tos (sp);
+ }
+ else if (DEPRECATED_SAVE_DUMMY_FRAME_TOS_P ())
+ DEPRECATED_SAVE_DUMMY_FRAME_TOS (sp);
- {
- char *name;
- struct symbol *symbol;
+ /* Now proceed, having reached the desired place. */
+ clear_proceed_status ();
+
+ /* Create a momentary breakpoint at the return address of the
+ inferior. That way it breaks when it returns. */
- name = NULL;
- symbol = find_pc_function (funaddr);
- if (symbol)
+ {
+ struct breakpoint *bpt;
+ struct symtab_and_line sal;
+ struct frame_id frame;
+ init_sal (&sal); /* initialize to zeroes */
+ sal.pc = bp_addr;
+ sal.section = find_pc_overlay (sal.pc);
+ /* Set up a frame ID for the dummy frame so we can pass it to
+ set_momentary_breakpoint. We need to give the breakpoint a
+ frame ID so that the breakpoint code can correctly re-identify
+ the dummy breakpoint. */
+ if (gdbarch_unwind_dummy_id_p (current_gdbarch))
{
- name = SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (symbol);
+ /* Sanity. The exact same SP value is returned by
+ PUSH_DUMMY_CALL, saved as the dummy-frame TOS, and used by
+ unwind_dummy_id to form the frame ID's stack address. */
+ gdb_assert (DEPRECATED_USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES);
+ frame = frame_id_build (sp, sal.pc);
}
else
{
- /* Try the minimal symbols. */
- struct minimal_symbol *msymbol = lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc (funaddr);
-
- if (msymbol)
- {
- name = SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (msymbol);
- }
- }
- if (name == NULL)
- {
- char format[80];
- sprintf (format, "at %s", local_hex_format ());
- name = alloca (80);
- /* FIXME-32x64: assumes funaddr fits in a long. */
- sprintf (name, format, (unsigned long) funaddr);
+ /* The assumption here is that push_dummy_call() returned the
+ stack part of the frame ID. Unfortunately, many older
+ architectures were, via a convoluted mess, relying on the
+ poorly defined and greatly overloaded
+ DEPRECATED_TARGET_READ_FP or DEPRECATED_FP_REGNUM to supply
+ the value. */
+ if (DEPRECATED_TARGET_READ_FP_P ())
+ frame = frame_id_build (DEPRECATED_TARGET_READ_FP (), sal.pc);
+ else if (DEPRECATED_FP_REGNUM >= 0)
+ frame = frame_id_build (read_register (DEPRECATED_FP_REGNUM), sal.pc);
+ else
+ frame = frame_id_build (sp, sal.pc);
}
+ bpt = set_momentary_breakpoint (sal, frame, bp_call_dummy);
+ bpt->disposition = disp_del;
+ }
- {
- /* Execute a "stack dummy", a piece of code stored in the stack
- by the debugger to be executed in the inferior.
+ /* Execute a "stack dummy", a piece of code stored in the stack by
+ the debugger to be executed in the inferior.
- The dummy's frame is automatically popped whenever that break
- is hit. If that is the first time the program stops,
- call_function_by_hand returns to its caller with that frame
- already gone and sets RC to 0.
+ The dummy's frame is automatically popped whenever that break is
+ hit. If that is the first time the program stops,
+ call_function_by_hand returns to its caller with that frame
+ already gone and sets RC to 0.
- Otherwise, set RC to a non-zero value. If the called
- function receives a random signal, we do not allow the user
- to continue executing it as this may not work. The dummy
- frame is poped and we return 1. If we hit a breakpoint, we
- leave the frame in place and return 2 (the frame will
- eventually be popped when we do hit the dummy end
- breakpoint). */
-
- struct regcache *buffer = retbuf;
- struct cleanup *old_cleanups = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, 0);
- int saved_async = 0;
- struct breakpoint *bpt;
- struct symtab_and_line sal;
-
- /* Now proceed, having reached the desired place. */
- clear_proceed_status ();
-
- init_sal (&sal); /* initialize to zeroes */
- sal.pc = bp_addr;
- sal.section = find_pc_overlay (sal.pc);
-
- {
- /* Set up a frame ID for the dummy frame so we can pass it to
- set_momentary_breakpoint. We need to give the breakpoint a
- frame ID so that the breakpoint code can correctly
- re-identify the dummy breakpoint. */
- struct frame_id frame = frame_id_build (read_fp (), sal.pc);
- /* Create a momentary breakpoint at the return address of the
- inferior. That way it breaks when it returns. */
- bpt = set_momentary_breakpoint (sal, frame, bp_call_dummy);
- bpt->disposition = disp_del;
- }
-
- /* If all error()s out of proceed ended up calling normal_stop
- (and perhaps they should; it already does in the special case
- of error out of resume()), then we wouldn't need this. */
- make_cleanup (breakpoint_auto_delete_contents, &stop_bpstat);
+ Otherwise, set RC to a non-zero value. If the called function
+ receives a random signal, we do not allow the user to continue
+ executing it as this may not work. The dummy frame is poped and
+ we return 1. If we hit a breakpoint, we leave the frame in place
+ and return 2 (the frame will eventually be popped when we do hit
+ the dummy end breakpoint). */
- disable_watchpoints_before_interactive_call_start ();
- proceed_to_finish = 1; /* We want stop_registers, please... */
-
- if (target_can_async_p ())
- saved_async = target_async_mask (0);
-
- proceed (real_pc, TARGET_SIGNAL_0, 0);
-
- if (saved_async)
- target_async_mask (saved_async);
-
- enable_watchpoints_after_interactive_call_stop ();
+ {
+ struct cleanup *old_cleanups = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, 0);
+ int saved_async = 0;
+
+ /* If all error()s out of proceed ended up calling normal_stop
+ (and perhaps they should; it already does in the special case
+ of error out of resume()), then we wouldn't need this. */
+ make_cleanup (breakpoint_auto_delete_contents, &stop_bpstat);
+
+ disable_watchpoints_before_interactive_call_start ();
+ proceed_to_finish = 1; /* We want stop_registers, please... */
+
+ if (target_can_async_p ())
+ saved_async = target_async_mask (0);
+
+ proceed (real_pc, TARGET_SIGNAL_0, 0);
+
+ if (saved_async)
+ target_async_mask (saved_async);
+
+ enable_watchpoints_after_interactive_call_stop ();
- discard_cleanups (old_cleanups);
-
- if (stopped_by_random_signal)
- /* We can stop during an inferior call because a signal is
- received. */
- rc = 1;
- else if (!stop_stack_dummy)
- /* We may also stop prematurely because we hit a breakpoint in
- the called routine. */
- rc = 2;
- else
- {
- /* On normal return, the stack dummy has been popped
- already. */
- regcache_cpy_no_passthrough (buffer, stop_registers);
- rc = 0;
- }
- }
+ discard_cleanups (old_cleanups);
+ }
- if (rc == 1)
+ if (stopped_by_random_signal || !stop_stack_dummy)
+ {
+ /* Find the name of the function we're about to complain about. */
+ const char *name = NULL;
{
- /* We stopped inside the FUNCTION because of a random signal.
- Further execution of the FUNCTION is not allowed. */
-
- if (unwind_on_signal_p)
+ struct symbol *symbol = find_pc_function (funaddr);
+ if (symbol)
+ name = SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (symbol);
+ else
{
- /* The user wants the context restored. */
+ /* Try the minimal symbols. */
+ struct minimal_symbol *msymbol = lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc (funaddr);
+ if (msymbol)
+ name = SYMBOL_PRINT_NAME (msymbol);
+ }
+ if (name == NULL)
+ {
+ /* Can't use a cleanup here. It is discarded, instead use
+ an alloca. */
+ char *tmp = xstrprintf ("at %s", local_hex_string (funaddr));
+ char *a = alloca (strlen (tmp) + 1);
+ strcpy (a, tmp);
+ xfree (tmp);
+ name = a;
+ }
+ }
+ if (stopped_by_random_signal)
+ {
+ /* We stopped inside the FUNCTION because of a random
+ signal. Further execution of the FUNCTION is not
+ allowed. */
- /* We must get back to the frame we were before the dummy
- call. */
- frame_pop (get_current_frame ());
+ if (unwind_on_signal_p)
+ {
+ /* The user wants the context restored. */
+
+ /* We must get back to the frame we were before the
+ dummy call. */
+ frame_pop (get_current_frame ());
- /* FIXME: Insert a bunch of wrap_here; name can be very long if it's
- a C++ name with arguments and stuff. */
- error ("\
+ /* FIXME: Insert a bunch of wrap_here; name can be very
+ long if it's a C++ name with arguments and stuff. */
+ error ("\
The program being debugged was signaled while in a function called from GDB.\n\
GDB has restored the context to what it was before the call.\n\
To change this behavior use \"set unwindonsignal off\"\n\
Evaluation of the expression containing the function (%s) will be abandoned.",
- name);
- }
- else
- {
- /* The user wants to stay in the frame where we stopped (default).*/
-
- /* If we restored the inferior status (via the cleanup),
- we would print a spurious error message (Unable to
- restore previously selected frame), would write the
- registers from the inf_status (which is wrong), and
- would do other wrong things. */
- discard_cleanups (inf_status_cleanup);
- discard_inferior_status (inf_status);
-
- /* FIXME: Insert a bunch of wrap_here; name can be very long if it's
- a C++ name with arguments and stuff. */
- error ("\
+ name);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* The user wants to stay in the frame where we stopped
+ (default).*/
+ /* If we restored the inferior status (via the cleanup),
+ we would print a spurious error message (Unable to
+ restore previously selected frame), would write the
+ registers from the inf_status (which is wrong), and
+ would do other wrong things. */
+ discard_cleanups (inf_status_cleanup);
+ discard_inferior_status (inf_status);
+ /* FIXME: Insert a bunch of wrap_here; name can be very
+ long if it's a C++ name with arguments and stuff. */
+ error ("\
The program being debugged was signaled while in a function called from GDB.\n\
GDB remains in the frame where the signal was received.\n\
To change this behavior use \"set unwindonsignal on\"\n\
Evaluation of the expression containing the function (%s) will be abandoned.",
- name);
- }
- }
+ name);
+ }
+ }
- if (rc == 2)
- {
- /* We hit a breakpoint inside the FUNCTION. */
-
- /* If we restored the inferior status (via the cleanup), we
- would print a spurious error message (Unable to restore
- previously selected frame), would write the registers from
- the inf_status (which is wrong), and would do other wrong
- things. */
- discard_cleanups (inf_status_cleanup);
- discard_inferior_status (inf_status);
-
- /* The following error message used to say "The expression
- which contained the function call has been discarded." It
- is a hard concept to explain in a few words. Ideally, GDB
- would be able to resume evaluation of the expression when
- the function finally is done executing. Perhaps someday
- this will be implemented (it would not be easy). */
-
- /* FIXME: Insert a bunch of wrap_here; name can be very long if it's
- a C++ name with arguments and stuff. */
- error ("\
+ if (!stop_stack_dummy)
+ {
+ /* We hit a breakpoint inside the FUNCTION. */
+ /* If we restored the inferior status (via the cleanup), we
+ would print a spurious error message (Unable to restore
+ previously selected frame), would write the registers
+ from the inf_status (which is wrong), and would do other
+ wrong things. */
+ discard_cleanups (inf_status_cleanup);
+ discard_inferior_status (inf_status);
+ /* The following error message used to say "The expression
+ which contained the function call has been discarded."
+ It is a hard concept to explain in a few words. Ideally,
+ GDB would be able to resume evaluation of the expression
+ when the function finally is done executing. Perhaps
+ someday this will be implemented (it would not be easy). */
+ /* FIXME: Insert a bunch of wrap_here; name can be very long if it's
+ a C++ name with arguments and stuff. */
+ error ("\
The program being debugged stopped while in a function called from GDB.\n\
When the function (%s) is done executing, GDB will silently\n\
stop (instead of continuing to evaluate the expression containing\n\
the function call).", name);
- }
+ }
- /* If we get here the called FUNCTION run to completion. */
-
- /* Restore the inferior status, via its cleanup. At this stage,
- leave the RETBUF alone. */
- do_cleanups (inf_status_cleanup);
-
- /* Figure out the value returned by the function. */
- /* elz: I defined this new macro for the hppa architecture only.
- this gives us a way to get the value returned by the function
- from the stack, at the same address we told the function to put
- it. We cannot assume on the pa that r28 still contains the
- address of the returned structure. Usually this will be
- overwritten by the callee. I don't know about other
- architectures, so I defined this macro */
-#ifdef VALUE_RETURNED_FROM_STACK
- if (struct_return)
- {
- do_cleanups (retbuf_cleanup);
- return VALUE_RETURNED_FROM_STACK (value_type, struct_addr);
- }
-#endif
- /* NOTE: cagney/2002-09-10: Only when the stack has been correctly
- aligned (using frame_align()) do we can trust STRUCT_ADDR and
- fetch the return value direct from the stack. This lack of
- trust comes about because legacy targets have a nasty habit of
- silently, and local to PUSH_ARGUMENTS(), moving STRUCT_ADDR.
- For such targets, just hope that value_being_returned() can
- find the adjusted value. */
- if (struct_return && gdbarch_frame_align_p (current_gdbarch))
- {
- struct value *retval = value_at (value_type, struct_addr, NULL);
- do_cleanups (retbuf_cleanup);
- return retval;
- }
- else
- {
- struct value *retval = value_being_returned (value_type, retbuf,
- struct_return);
- do_cleanups (retbuf_cleanup);
- return retval;
- }
- }
+ /* The above code errors out, so ... */
+ internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, "... should not be here");
+ }
+
+ /* If we get here the called FUNCTION run to completion. */
+
+ /* On normal return, the stack dummy has been popped already. */
+ regcache_cpy_no_passthrough (retbuf, stop_registers);
+
+ /* Restore the inferior status, via its cleanup. At this stage,
+ leave the RETBUF alone. */
+ do_cleanups (inf_status_cleanup);
+
+ /* Figure out the value returned by the function. */
+ if (struct_return)
+ {
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2003-09-27: This assumes that PUSH_DUMMY_CALL
+ has correctly stored STRUCT_ADDR in the target. In the past
+ that hasn't been the case, the old MIPS PUSH_ARGUMENTS
+ (PUSH_DUMMY_CALL precursor) would silently move the location
+ of the struct return value making STRUCT_ADDR bogus. If
+ you're seeing problems with values being returned using the
+ "struct return convention", check that PUSH_DUMMY_CALL isn't
+ playing tricks. */
+ struct value *retval = value_at (value_type, struct_addr, NULL);
+ do_cleanups (retbuf_cleanup);
+ return retval;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* The non-register case was handled above. */
+ struct value *retval = register_value_being_returned (value_type,
+ retbuf);
+ do_cleanups (retbuf_cleanup);
+ return retval;
+ }
}
void _initialize_infcall (void);