/* Check for and handle cretinous dbx symbol name
continuation! */
- if (*p == '\\')
+ if (*p == '\\' || (*p == '?' && p[1] == '\0'))
p = next_symbol_text ();
/* Point to the character after the name
case '9':
continue;
- default:
- /* Unexpected symbol. Ignore it; perhaps it is an extension
- that we don't know about.
-
- Someone says sun cc puts out symbols like
+ case ':':
+ /* It is a C++ nested symbol. We don't need to record it
+ (I don't think); if we try to look up foo::bar::baz,
+ then symbols for the symtab containing foo should get
+ read in, I think. */
+ /* Someone says sun cc puts out symbols like
/foo/baz/maclib::/usr/local/bin/maclib,
which would get here with a symbol type of ':'. */
+ continue;
+
+ default:
+ /* Unexpected symbol descriptor. The second and subsequent stabs
+ of a continued stab can show up here. The question is
+ whether they ever can mimic a normal stab--it would be
+ nice if not, since we certainly don't want to spend the
+ time searching to the end of every string looking for
+ a backslash. */
+
complain (&unknown_symchar_complaint, p[1]);
+
+ /* Ignore it; perhaps it is an extension that we don't
+ know about. */
continue;
}
/* If we haven't found it yet, ignore it. It's probably some
new type we don't know about yet. */
complain (&unknown_symtype_complaint,
- local_hex_string ((unsigned long) CUR_SYMBOL_TYPE));
+ local_hex_string (CUR_SYMBOL_TYPE));
continue;
}