#include "nbsd-tdep.h"
#include "tramp-frame.h"
#include "trad-frame.h"
-
+#include "gdb_assert.h"
#include "solib-svr4.h"
#define REG_FIXREG_OFFSET(x) ((x) * 4)
struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch);
int i;
- for (i = 0; i <= 31; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < ppc_num_gprs; i++)
{
- if (regno == i || regno == -1)
- supply_register (i, regs + REG_FIXREG_OFFSET (i));
+ if (regno == tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + i || regno == -1)
+ supply_register (tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + i,
+ regs + REG_FIXREG_OFFSET (i));
}
if (regno == tdep->ppc_lr_regnum || regno == -1)
struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch);
int i;
- for (i = 0; i <= 31; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < ppc_num_gprs; i++)
{
- if (regno == i || regno == -1)
- regcache_collect (i, regs + REG_FIXREG_OFFSET (i));
+ if (regno == tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + i || regno == -1)
+ regcache_collect (tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + i,
+ regs + REG_FIXREG_OFFSET (i));
}
if (regno == tdep->ppc_lr_regnum || regno == -1)
struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch);
int i;
+ /* FIXME: jimb/2004-05-05: Some PPC variants don't have floating
+ point registers. Traditionally, GDB's register set has still
+ listed the floating point registers for such machines, so this
+ code is harmless. However, the new E500 port actually omits the
+ floating point registers entirely from the register set --- they
+ don't even have register numbers assigned to them.
+
+ It's not clear to me how best to update this code, so this assert
+ will alert the first person to encounter the NetBSD/E500
+ combination to the problem. */
+ gdb_assert (ppc_floating_point_unit_p (current_gdbarch));
+
for (i = 0; i < ppc_num_fprs; i++)
{
if (regno == tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum + i || regno == -1)
struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch);
int i;
+ /* FIXME: jimb/2004-05-05: Some PPC variants don't have floating
+ point registers. Traditionally, GDB's register set has still
+ listed the floating point registers for such machines, so this
+ code is harmless. However, the new E500 port actually omits the
+ floating point registers entirely from the register set --- they
+ don't even have register numbers assigned to them.
+
+ It's not clear to me how best to update this code, so this assert
+ will alert the first person to encounter the NetBSD/E500
+ combination to the problem. */
+ gdb_assert (ppc_floating_point_unit_p (current_gdbarch));
+
for (i = 0; i < ppc_num_fprs; i++)
{
if (regno == tdep->ppc_fp0_regnum + i || regno == -1)
base = frame_unwind_register_unsigned (next_frame, SP_REGNUM);
offset = base + 0x18 + 2 * tdep->wordsize;
- for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < ppc_num_gprs; i++)
{
int regnum = i + tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum;
trad_frame_set_reg_addr (this_cache, regnum, offset);