both raw registers and memory by the architecture methods
gdbarch_register_read and gdbarch_register_write. */
int nr_cooked_registers;
+ long sizeof_cooked_registers;
+ long sizeof_cooked_register_valid_p;
/* Offset and size (in 8 bit bytes), of reach register in the
register cache. All registers (including those in the range
gdb_assert (gdbarch != NULL);
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-11: Shouldn't be including pseudo-registers
- in the register buffer. Unfortunatly some architectures do. */
+ in the register cache. Unfortunatly some architectures still
+ rely on this and the pseudo_register_write() method. */
descr->nr_raw_registers = descr->nr_cooked_registers;
- descr->sizeof_raw_register_valid_p = descr->nr_cooked_registers;
-
- /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-11: Instead of using REGISTER_BYTE() this
- code should compute the offets et.al. at runtime. This currently
- isn't possible because some targets overlap register locations -
- see the mess in read_register_bytes() and write_register_bytes()
- registers. */
+ descr->sizeof_raw_register_valid_p = descr->sizeof_cooked_register_valid_p;
+
+ /* Compute the offset of each register. Legacy architectures define
+ REGISTER_BYTE() so use that. */
+ /* FIXME: cagney/2002-11-07: Instead of using REGISTER_BYTE() this
+ code should, as is done in init_regcache_descr(), compute the
+ offets at runtime. This currently isn't possible as some ISAs
+ define overlapping register regions - see the mess in
+ read_register_bytes() and write_register_bytes() registers. */
descr->sizeof_register = XCALLOC (descr->nr_cooked_registers, long);
descr->register_offset = XCALLOC (descr->nr_cooked_registers, long);
descr->max_register_size = 0;
for (i = 0; i < descr->nr_cooked_registers; i++)
{
+ /* FIXME: cagney/2001-12-04: This code shouldn't need to use
+ REGISTER_BYTE(). Unfortunatly, legacy code likes to lay the
+ buffer out so that certain registers just happen to overlap.
+ Ulgh! New targets use gdbarch's register read/write and
+ entirely avoid this uglyness. */
descr->register_offset[i] = REGISTER_BYTE (i);
descr->sizeof_register[i] = REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (i);
if (descr->max_register_size < REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (i))
descr->max_register_size = REGISTER_VIRTUAL_SIZE (i);
}
- /* Come up with the real size of the registers buffer. */
- descr->sizeof_raw_registers = REGISTER_BYTES; /* OK use. */
+ /* Compute the real size of the register buffer. Start out by
+ trusting REGISTER_BYTES, but then adjust it upwards should that
+ be found to not be sufficient. */
+ /* FIXME: cagney/2002-11-05: Instead of using REGISTER_BYTES, this
+ code should, as is done in init_regcache_descr(), compute the
+ total number of register bytes using the accumulated offsets. */
+ descr->sizeof_cooked_registers = REGISTER_BYTES; /* OK use. */
for (i = 0; i < descr->nr_cooked_registers; i++)
{
long regend;
legacy code is free to put registers in random places in the
buffer separated by holes. Once REGISTER_BYTE() is killed
this can be greatly simplified. */
- /* FIXME: cagney/2001-12-04: This code shouldn't need to use
- REGISTER_BYTE(). Unfortunatly, legacy code likes to lay the
- buffer out so that certain registers just happen to overlap.
- Ulgh! New targets use gdbarch's register read/write and
- entirely avoid this uglyness. */
regend = descr->register_offset[i] + descr->sizeof_register[i];
- if (descr->sizeof_raw_registers < regend)
- descr->sizeof_raw_registers = regend;
+ if (descr->sizeof_cooked_registers < regend)
+ descr->sizeof_cooked_registers = regend;
}
+ /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-11: Shouldn't be including pseudo-registers
+ in the register cache. Unfortunatly some architectures still
+ rely on this and the pseudo_register_write() method. */
+ descr->sizeof_raw_registers = descr->sizeof_cooked_registers;
}
static void *
directly onto the raw register cache while the pseudo's are
either mapped onto raw-registers or memory. */
descr->nr_cooked_registers = NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS;
+ descr->sizeof_cooked_register_valid_p = NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS;
/* Fill in a table of register types. */
descr->register_type = XCALLOC (descr->nr_cooked_registers,
array. This pretects GDB from erant code that accesses elements
of the global register_valid_p[] array in the range [NUM_REGS
.. NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS). */
- descr->sizeof_raw_register_valid_p = NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS;
+ descr->sizeof_raw_register_valid_p = descr->sizeof_cooked_register_valid_p;
- /* Lay out the register cache. The pseud-registers are included in
- the layout even though their value isn't stored in the register
- cache. Some code, via read_register_bytes() access a register
- using an offset/length rather than a register number.
+ /* Lay out the register cache.
NOTE: cagney/2002-05-22: Only register_type() is used when
constructing the register cache. It is assumed that the
descr->max_register_size = descr->sizeof_register[i];
}
/* Set the real size of the register cache buffer. */
- /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-22: Should only need to allocate space
- for the raw registers. Unfortunatly some code still accesses
- the register array directly using the global registers[].
- Until that code has been purged, play safe and over allocating
- the register buffer. Ulgh! */
- descr->sizeof_raw_registers = offset;
- /* = descr->register_offset[descr->nr_raw_registers]; */
+ descr->sizeof_cooked_registers = offset;
}
+ /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-22: Should only need to allocate space for
+ the raw registers. Unfortunatly some code still accesses the
+ register array directly using the global registers[]. Until that
+ code has been purged, play safe and over allocating the register
+ buffer. Ulgh! */
+ descr->sizeof_raw_registers = descr->sizeof_cooked_registers;
+
#if 0
/* Sanity check. Confirm that the assumptions about gdbarch are
true. The REGCACHE_DESCR_HANDLE is set before doing the checks
struct regcache
{
struct regcache_descr *descr;
- char *raw_registers;
- char *raw_register_valid_p;
- /* If a value isn't in the cache should the corresponding target be
- queried for a value. */
- int passthrough_p;
+ /* The register buffers. A read-only register cache can hold the
+ full [0 .. NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS) while a read/write
+ register cache can only hold [0 .. NUM_REGS). */
+ char *registers;
+ char *register_valid_p;
+ /* Is this a read-only cache? A read-only cache is used for saving
+ the target's register state (e.g, across an inferior function
+ call or just before forcing a function return). A read-only
+ cache can only be updated via the methods regcache_dup() and
+ regcache_cpy(). The actual contents are determined by the
+ reggroup_save and reggroup_restore methods. */
+ int readonly_p;
};
struct regcache *
descr = regcache_descr (gdbarch);
regcache = XMALLOC (struct regcache);
regcache->descr = descr;
- regcache->raw_registers
+ regcache->registers
= XCALLOC (descr->sizeof_raw_registers, char);
- regcache->raw_register_valid_p
+ regcache->register_valid_p
= XCALLOC (descr->sizeof_raw_register_valid_p, char);
- regcache->passthrough_p = 0;
+ regcache->readonly_p = 1;
return regcache;
}
{
if (regcache == NULL)
return;
- xfree (regcache->raw_registers);
- xfree (regcache->raw_register_valid_p);
+ xfree (regcache->registers);
+ xfree (regcache->register_valid_p);
xfree (regcache);
}
return make_cleanup (do_regcache_xfree, regcache);
}
+/* Return a pointer to register REGNUM's buffer cache. */
+
+static char *
+register_buffer (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum)
+{
+ return regcache->registers + regcache->descr->register_offset[regnum];
+}
+
+void
+regcache_save (struct regcache *dst, struct regcache *src)
+{
+ struct gdbarch *gdbarch = dst->descr->gdbarch;
+ int regnum;
+ /* The SRC and DST register caches had better belong to the same
+ architecture. */
+ gdb_assert (src->descr->gdbarch == dst->descr->gdbarch);
+ /* The DST should be `read-only', if it wasn't then the save would
+ end up trying to write the register values out through to the
+ target. */
+ gdb_assert (!src->readonly_p);
+ gdb_assert (dst->readonly_p);
+ /* Clear the dest. */
+ memset (dst->registers, 0, dst->descr->sizeof_cooked_registers);
+ memset (dst->register_valid_p, 0, dst->descr->sizeof_cooked_register_valid_p);
+ /* Copy over any registers (identified by their membership in the
+ save_reggroup) and mark them as valid. The full [0
+ .. NUM_REGS+NUM_PSEUDO_REGS) range is checked since some
+ architectures need to save/restore `cooked' registers that live
+ in memory. */
+ for (regnum = 0; regnum < dst->descr->nr_cooked_registers; regnum++)
+ {
+ if (gdbarch_register_reggroup_p (gdbarch, regnum, save_reggroup))
+ {
+ regcache_cooked_read (src, regnum, register_buffer (dst, regnum));
+ dst->register_valid_p[regnum] = 1;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void
+regcache_restore (struct regcache *dst, struct regcache *src)
+{
+ struct gdbarch *gdbarch = dst->descr->gdbarch;
+ int regnum;
+ gdb_assert (src->descr->gdbarch == dst->descr->gdbarch);
+ gdb_assert (!dst->readonly_p);
+ gdb_assert (src->readonly_p);
+ /* Copy over any registers, being careful to only restore those that
+ were both saved and need to be restored. The full [0
+ .. NUM_REGS+NUM_PSEUDO_REGS) range is checked since some
+ architectures need to save/restore `cooked' registers that live
+ in memory. */
+ for (regnum = 0; regnum < src->descr->nr_cooked_registers; regnum++)
+ {
+ if (gdbarch_register_reggroup_p (gdbarch, regnum, restore_reggroup)
+ && src->register_valid_p[regnum])
+ {
+ regcache_cooked_write (dst, regnum, register_buffer (src, regnum));
+ }
+ }
+}
+
void
regcache_cpy (struct regcache *dst, struct regcache *src)
{
gdb_assert (src != NULL && dst != NULL);
gdb_assert (src->descr->gdbarch == dst->descr->gdbarch);
gdb_assert (src != dst);
- /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-17: To say this bit is bad is being polite.
- It keeps the existing code working where things rely on going
- through to the register cache. */
- if (src == current_regcache && src->descr->legacy_p)
- {
- /* ULGH!!!! Old way. Use REGISTER bytes and let code below
- untangle fetch. */
- read_register_bytes (0, dst->raw_registers, REGISTER_BYTES);
- return;
- }
- /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-17: To say this bit is bad is being polite.
- It keeps the existing code working where things rely on going
- through to the register cache. */
- if (dst == current_regcache && dst->descr->legacy_p)
- {
- /* ULGH!!!! Old way. Use REGISTER bytes and let code below
- untangle fetch. */
- write_register_bytes (0, src->raw_registers, REGISTER_BYTES);
- return;
- }
- buf = alloca (src->descr->max_register_size);
- for (i = 0; i < src->descr->nr_raw_registers; i++)
- {
- /* Should we worry about the valid bit here? */
- regcache_raw_read (src, i, buf);
- regcache_raw_write (dst, i, buf);
- }
+ gdb_assert (src->readonly_p || dst->readonly_p);
+ if (!src->readonly_p)
+ regcache_save (dst, src);
+ else if (!dst->readonly_p)
+ regcache_restore (dst, src);
+ else
+ regcache_cpy_no_passthrough (dst, src);
}
void
move of data into the current_regcache(). Doing this would be
silly - it would mean that valid_p would be completly invalid. */
gdb_assert (dst != current_regcache);
- memcpy (dst->raw_registers, src->raw_registers,
- dst->descr->sizeof_raw_registers);
- memcpy (dst->raw_register_valid_p, src->raw_register_valid_p,
+ memcpy (dst->registers, src->registers, dst->descr->sizeof_raw_registers);
+ memcpy (dst->register_valid_p, src->register_valid_p,
dst->descr->sizeof_raw_register_valid_p);
}
{
gdb_assert (regcache != NULL);
gdb_assert (regnum >= 0 && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers);
- return regcache->raw_register_valid_p[regnum];
+ return regcache->register_valid_p[regnum];
}
char *
deprecated_grub_regcache_for_registers (struct regcache *regcache)
{
- return regcache->raw_registers;
+ return regcache->registers;
}
char *
deprecated_grub_regcache_for_register_valid (struct regcache *regcache)
{
- return regcache->raw_register_valid_p;
+ return regcache->register_valid_p;
}
/* Global structure containing the current regcache. */
/* REGISTERS contains the cached register values (in target byte order). */
-char *registers;
+char *deprecated_registers;
/* DEPRECATED_REGISTER_VALID is 0 if the register needs to be fetched,
1 if it has been fetched, and
{
gdb_assert (regnum >= 0);
gdb_assert (regnum < current_regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers);
- current_regcache->raw_register_valid_p[regnum] = state;
-}
-
-/* REGISTER_CHANGED
-
- invalidate a single register REGNUM in the cache */
-void
-register_changed (int regnum)
-{
- set_register_cached (regnum, 0);
-}
-
-/* If REGNUM >= 0, return a pointer to register REGNUM's cache buffer area,
- else return a pointer to the start of the cache buffer. */
-
-static char *
-register_buffer (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum)
-{
- return regcache->raw_registers + regcache->descr->register_offset[regnum];
+ current_regcache->register_valid_p[regnum] = state;
}
/* Return whether register REGNUM is a real register. */
Fetching all real regs NEVER accounts for pseudo-regs. */
}
-/* read_register_bytes and write_register_bytes are generally a *BAD*
- idea. They are inefficient because they need to check for partial
- updates, which can only be done by scanning through all of the
- registers and seeing if the bytes that are being read/written fall
- inside of an invalid register. [The main reason this is necessary
- is that register sizes can vary, so a simple index won't suffice.]
- It is far better to call read_register_gen and write_register_gen
- if you want to get at the raw register contents, as it only takes a
- regnum as an argument, and therefore can't do a partial register
- update.
+/* deprecated_read_register_bytes and deprecated_write_register_bytes
+ are generally a *BAD* idea. They are inefficient because they need
+ to check for partial updates, which can only be done by scanning
+ through all of the registers and seeing if the bytes that are being
+ read/written fall inside of an invalid register. [The main reason
+ this is necessary is that register sizes can vary, so a simple
+ index won't suffice.] It is far better to call read_register_gen
+ and write_register_gen if you want to get at the raw register
+ contents, as it only takes a regnum as an argument, and therefore
+ can't do a partial register update.
Prior to the recent fixes to check for partial updates, both read
- and write_register_bytes always checked to see if any registers
- were stale, and then called target_fetch_registers (-1) to update
- the whole set. This caused really slowed things down for remote
- targets. */
+ and deprecated_write_register_bytes always checked to see if any
+ registers were stale, and then called target_fetch_registers (-1)
+ to update the whole set. This caused really slowed things down for
+ remote targets. */
/* Copy INLEN bytes of consecutive data from registers
starting with the INREGBYTE'th byte of register data
into memory at MYADDR. */
void
-read_register_bytes (int in_start, char *in_buf, int in_len)
+deprecated_read_register_bytes (int in_start, char *in_buf, int in_len)
{
int in_end = in_start + in_len;
int regnum;
/* FIXME: cagney/2001-08-18: This is just silly. It defeats
the entire register read/write flow of control. Must
resist temptation to return 0xdeadbeef. */
- memcpy (reg_buf, registers + reg_start, reg_len);
+ memcpy (reg_buf, &deprecated_registers[reg_start], reg_len);
/* Legacy note: This function, for some reason, allows a NULL
input buffer. If the buffer is NULL, the registers are still
gdb_assert (regcache != NULL && buf != NULL);
gdb_assert (regnum >= 0 && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers);
if (regcache->descr->legacy_p
- && regcache->passthrough_p)
+ && !regcache->readonly_p)
{
gdb_assert (regcache == current_regcache);
/* For moment, just use underlying legacy code. Ulgh!!! This
to the current thread. This switching shouldn't be necessary
only there is still only one target side register cache. Sigh!
On the bright side, at least there is a regcache object. */
- if (regcache->passthrough_p)
+ if (!regcache->readonly_p)
{
gdb_assert (regcache == current_regcache);
if (! ptid_equal (registers_ptid, inferior_ptid))
target_fetch_registers (regnum);
}
/* Copy the value directly into the register cache. */
- memcpy (buf, (regcache->raw_registers
- + regcache->descr->register_offset[regnum]),
+ memcpy (buf, register_buffer (regcache, regnum),
regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
}
gdb_assert (regnum < regcache->descr->nr_cooked_registers);
if (regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers)
regcache_raw_read (regcache, regnum, buf);
+ else if (regcache->readonly_p
+ && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_cooked_registers
+ && regcache->register_valid_p[regnum])
+ /* Read-only register cache, perhaphs the cooked value was cached? */
+ memcpy (buf, register_buffer (regcache, regnum),
+ regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
else
gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (regcache->descr->gdbarch, regcache,
regnum, buf);
{
gdb_assert (regcache != NULL && buf != NULL);
gdb_assert (regnum >= 0 && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers);
+ gdb_assert (!regcache->readonly_p);
- if (regcache->passthrough_p
- && regcache->descr->legacy_p)
+ if (regcache->descr->legacy_p)
{
/* For moment, just use underlying legacy code. Ulgh!!! This
silently and very indirectly updates the regcache's buffers
if (CANNOT_STORE_REGISTER (regnum))
return;
- /* Handle the simple case first -> not write through so just store
- value in cache. */
- if (!regcache->passthrough_p)
- {
- memcpy ((regcache->raw_registers
- + regcache->descr->register_offset[regnum]), buf,
- regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
- regcache->raw_register_valid_p[regnum] = 1;
- return;
- }
-
/* Make certain that the correct cache is selected. */
gdb_assert (regcache == current_regcache);
if (! ptid_equal (registers_ptid, inferior_ptid))
target_prepare_to_store ();
memcpy (register_buffer (regcache, regnum), buf,
regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
- regcache->raw_register_valid_p[regnum] = 1;
+ regcache->register_valid_p[regnum] = 1;
target_store_registers (regnum);
}
into registers starting with the MYREGSTART'th byte of register data. */
void
-write_register_bytes (int myregstart, char *myaddr, int inlen)
+deprecated_write_register_bytes (int myregstart, char *myaddr, int inlen)
{
int myregend = myregstart + inlen;
int regnum;
Update it from the target before scribbling on it. */
deprecated_read_register_gen (regnum, regbuf);
- memcpy (registers + overlapstart,
+ memcpy (&deprecated_registers[overlapstart],
myaddr + (overlapstart - myregstart),
overlapend - overlapstart);
return descr->register_offset[regnum];
}
-static void
-cooked_xfer_using_offset_hack (struct regcache *regcache,
- int buf_start, int buf_len, void *in_b,
- const void *out_b)
-{
- struct regcache_descr *descr = regcache->descr;
- struct gdbarch *gdbarch = descr->gdbarch;
- bfd_byte *in_buf = in_b;
- const bfd_byte *out_buf = out_b;
- int buf_end = buf_start + buf_len;
- int regnum;
- char *reg_buf = alloca (descr->max_register_size);
-
- /* NOTE: cagney/2002-08-17: This code assumes that the register
- offsets are strictly increasing and do not overlap. If this
- isn't the case then the bug is in the target architecture and NOT
- this code. */
-
- /* NOTE: cagney/2002-08-17: This code assumes that only the
- registers covered by BUF_START:BUF_LEN should be transfered. If,
- for some reason, there is a gap between two registers, then that
- gap isn't transfered. (The gap shouldn't be there but that is
- another story.) */
-
- /* Iterate through all registers looking for those that lie within
- BUF_START:BUF_LEN. */
-
- for (regnum = 0; regnum < descr->nr_cooked_registers; regnum++)
- {
- /* The register's location. */
- int reg_start = descr->register_offset[regnum];
- int reg_len = descr->sizeof_register[regnum];
- int reg_end = reg_start + reg_len;
-
- /* The START, END and LEN that falls within the current
- register. */
- int xfer_start;
- int xfer_end;
- int xfer_len;
-
- /* start = max (reg_start, buf_start) */
- if (reg_start > buf_start)
- xfer_start = reg_start;
- else
- xfer_start = buf_start;
-
- /* end = min (reg_end, buf_end) */
- if (reg_end < buf_end)
- xfer_end = reg_end;
- else
- xfer_end = buf_end;
-
- /* The number of bytes to transfer. If there isn't anything to
- transfer (the end is before the start) this will be -ve. */
- xfer_len = xfer_end - xfer_start;
-
- if (xfer_len > 0)
- regcache_xfer_part (regcache, regnum, xfer_start - reg_start,
- xfer_len, in_b, out_b, regcache_cooked_read,
- regcache_cooked_write);
- }
-}
-
-void
-regcache_cooked_read_using_offset_hack (struct regcache *regcache,
- int buf_start, int buf_len, void *b)
-{
- cooked_xfer_using_offset_hack (regcache, buf_start, buf_len, b, NULL);
-}
-
-void
-regcache_cooked_write_using_offset_hack (struct regcache *regcache,
- int buf_start, int buf_len,
- const void *b)
-{
- cooked_xfer_using_offset_hack (regcache, buf_start, buf_len, NULL, b);
-}
-
/* Return the contents of register REGNUM as an unsigned integer. */
ULONGEST
build_regcache (void)
{
current_regcache = regcache_xmalloc (current_gdbarch);
- current_regcache->passthrough_p = 1;
- registers = deprecated_grub_regcache_for_registers (current_regcache);
+ current_regcache->readonly_p = 0;
+ deprecated_registers = deprecated_grub_regcache_for_registers (current_regcache);
deprecated_register_valid = deprecated_grub_regcache_for_register_valid (current_regcache);
}
regcache_descr_handle = register_gdbarch_data (init_regcache_descr,
xfree_regcache_descr);
REGISTER_GDBARCH_SWAP (current_regcache);
- register_gdbarch_swap (®isters, sizeof (registers), NULL);
+ register_gdbarch_swap (&deprecated_registers, sizeof (deprecated_registers), NULL);
register_gdbarch_swap (&deprecated_register_valid, sizeof (deprecated_register_valid), NULL);
register_gdbarch_swap (NULL, 0, build_regcache);
projects / deliverable / binutils-gdb.git / blobdiff