-# Copyright 1997, 1998, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# Copyright 1997-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
-#
+#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
-#
+#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
# tests for exception-handling support
# Static-linked executables use a different mechanism to get the
# address of the notification hook in the C++ support library.
-# TODO: this file is not ready for production yet. If you are working
-# on C++ exception support for gdb, you can take out the "continue"
-# statement and try your luck. -- chastain 2004-01-09
-
# TODO: this file has many absolute line numbers.
# Replace them with gdb_get_line_number.
set ws "\[\r\n\t \]+"
set nl "\[\r\n\]+"
-if $tracelevel then {
- strace $tracelevel
-}
-
-if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
+if { [skip_stl_tests] } { continue }
-set testfile "exception"
-set srcfile ${testfile}.cc
-set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
-
-if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
- untested exception.exp
- return -1
+# On SPU this test fails because the executable exceeds local storage size.
+if { [istarget "spu*-*-*"] } {
+ return 0
}
-# Start with a fresh gdb
-
-set prms_id 0
-set bug_id 0
-
-gdb_exit
-gdb_start
-gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
-gdb_load ${binfile}
-
-if ![runto_main] then {
- perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
- continue
+standard_testfile .cc
+
+if {[prepare_for_testing $testfile.exp $testfile $srcfile {debug c++}]} {
+ return -1
}
-# As I said before, this test script is not ready yet!
-
-continue
-
# Set a catch catchpoint
-gdb_test "catch catch" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(catch\\)"
+gdb_test "catch catch" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(catch\\)" \
+ "catch catch (before inferior run)"
# Set a throw catchpoint
gdb_test "catch throw" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(throw\\)" \
- "catch throw (static executable)"
+ "catch throw (before inferior run)"
-# The catchpoints should be listed in the list of breakpoints.
+# Set a rethrow catchpoint
+
+gdb_test "catch rethrow" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(rethrow\\)" \
+ "catch rethrow (before inferior run)"
+
+# The catchpoints should be listed in the list of breakpoints.
+# In case of a statically linked test, we won't have a pending breakpoint.
+# Hence we allow for both an address or "<PENDING>". If we ever become able
+# to tell whether the target is linked statically or not, we can be more
+# precise and require exact output.
+set addr "\(<PENDING>|$hex\)"
set re_head "Num${ws}Type${ws}Disp${ws}Enb${ws}Address${ws}What"
-set re_1_main "1${ws}breakpoint${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$hex${ws}in main.*breakpoint already hit.*"
-set re_2_catch "2${ws}catch catch${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$hex${ws}exception catch"
-set re_3_catch "3${ws}catch throw${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$hex${ws}exception throw"
-set re_2_bp "2${ws}breakpoint${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$hex${ws}exception catch"
-set re_3_bp "3${ws}breakpoint${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$hex${ws}exception throw"
+set re_2_bp "1${ws}breakpoint${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$addr${ws}exception catch"
+set re_3_bp "2${ws}breakpoint${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$addr${ws}exception throw"
+set re_4_bp "3${ws}breakpoint${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$addr${ws}exception rethrow"
-set name "info breakpoints"
+set name "info breakpoints (before inferior run)"
gdb_test_multiple "info breakpoints" $name {
- -re "$re_head${ws}$re_1_main${ws}$re_2_catch${ws}$re_3_catch\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ -re "$re_head${ws}$re_2_bp${ws}$re_3_bp${ws}$re_4_bp\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $name
}
- -re "$re_head${ws}$re_1_main${ws}$re_2_bp${ws}$re_3_bp\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- # TODO: gdb HEAD 2004-01-08 does this. Is this okay?
- unresolved $name
- }
+ -re ".*$gdb_prompt $"
+ {
+ fail $name
+ }
}
-# Some targets support "info catch".
-# Some do not.
+gdb_test "tbreak main" "Temporary breakpoint 4.*" \
+ "Set temporary breakpoint at main"
-set name "info catch"
-gdb_test_multiple "info catch" $name {
- -re "Info catch not supported with this target/compiler combination.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- unsupported $name
+set ok 0
+gdb_run_cmd
+gdb_test_multiple "" "Run to main" {
+ -re "Temporary breakpoint 4,.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass "Run to main"
+ set ok 1
}
- -re "No catches.\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- # TODO: gdb HEAD 2004-01-08 does this. Is this okay?
- unresolved $name
+}
+
+if { !$ok } {
+ continue
+}
+
+set addr "$hex"
+set re_head "Num${ws}Type${ws}Disp${ws}Enb${ws}Address${ws}What"
+set re_2_bp "1${ws}breakpoint${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$addr${ws}exception catch"
+set re_3_bp "2${ws}breakpoint${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$addr${ws}exception throw"
+set re_4_bp "3${ws}breakpoint${ws}keep${ws}y${ws}$addr${ws}exception rethrow"
+
+set name "info breakpoints (after inferior run)"
+gdb_test_multiple "info breakpoints" $name {
+ -re "$re_head${ws}$re_2_bp${ws}$re_3_bp${ws}$re_4_bp\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass $name
}
+ -re ".*$gdb_prompt $"
+ {
+ send_user "\n---\n$expect_out(buffer)\n---\n"
+ fail $name
+ }
}
+gdb_test "break catcher" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ at.*"
+
# Get the first exception thrown
set name "continue to first throw"
-re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception thrown\\), throw location.*${srcfile}:30, catch location .*${srcfile}:50\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $name
}
- -re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception thrown\\)\r\n.*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- # TODO: gdb HEAD 2004-01-08 does this. Is this okay?
- unresolved $name
+ -re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception thrown\\).*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass $name
}
}
set name "backtrace after first throw"
gdb_test_multiple "backtrace" $name {
- -re ".*#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in foo \\(i=20\\) at .*${srcfile}:30\r\n#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in main \\((void|)\\) at .*${srcfile}:48\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ -re ".*#\[0-9\]+.*\[\[:<:\]\]__cxa_throw\[\[:>:\]\].*#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in foo \\(i=20\\) at .*${srcfile}:\[0-9\]+\r\n#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in main \\(.*\\) at .*${srcfile}:\[0-9\]+\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ # Either __cxxabiv1::__cxa_throw or __cxa_throw can be printed
+ # depending on debug info presence.
pass $name
}
}
-re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception caught\\), throw location.*${srcfile}:30, catch location .*${srcfile}:50\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $name
}
- -re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception caught\\)\r\n.*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- # TODO: gdb HEAD 2004-01-08 does this. Is this okay?
- unresolved $name
+ -re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception caught\\).*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass $name
}
}
set name "backtrace after first catch"
gdb_test_multiple "backtrace" $name {
- -re ".*#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in main \\((void|)\\) at .*$srcfile:50\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ -re ".*#\[0-9\]+.*\[\[:<:\]\]__cxa_begin_catch\[\[:>:\]\].*#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in main \\(.*\\) at .*$srcfile:\[0-9\]+\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $name
}
}
+# Continue to breakpoint on catcher.
+gdb_test "continue" ".*catcher \\(x=13\\).*" "continue to catcher for the first time"
+
# Continue to second throw.
set name "continue to second throw"
gdb_test_multiple "continue" $name {
- -re "Continuing.${ws}Got an except 13${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception thrown\\), throw location.*${srcfile}:30, catch location .*${srcfile}:58\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ -re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception thrown\\), throw location.*${srcfile}:30, catch location .*${srcfile}:58\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $name
}
- -re "Continuing.${ws}Got an except 13${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception thrown\\)\r\n.*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- # TODO: gdb HEAD 2004-01-08 does this. Is this okay?
- unresolved $name
+ -re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception thrown\\).*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass $name
}
}
set name "backtrace after second throw"
gdb_test_multiple "backtrace" $name {
- -re ".*#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in foo \\(i=20\\) at .*${srcfile}:30\r\n#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in main \\((void|)\\) at .*${srcfile}:56\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ -re ".*#\[0-9\]+.*\[\[:<:\]\]__cxa_throw\[\[:>:\]\].*#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in foo \\(i=20\\) at .*${srcfile}:\[0-9\]+\r\n#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in main \\(.*\\) at .*${srcfile}:\[0-9\]+\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $name
}
}
-re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception caught\\), throw location.*${srcfile}:30, catch location .*${srcfile}:58\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $name
}
- -re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception caught\\)\r\n.*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- # TODO: gdb HEAD 2004-01-08 does this. Is this okay?
- unresolved $name
+ -re "Continuing.${ws}Catchpoint \[0-9\]+ \\(exception caught\\).*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass $name
}
}
set name "backtrace after second catch"
gdb_test_multiple "backtrace" $name {
- -re ".*#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in main \\((void|)\\) at .*$srcfile:58\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ -re ".*#\[0-9\]+.*\[\[:<:\]\]__cxa_begin_catch\[\[:>:\]\].*#\[0-9\]+${ws}$hex in main \\(.*\\) at .*$srcfile:\[0-9\]+\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $name
}
}
-# That is all for now.
-#
-# The original code had:
-#
-# continue to re-throw ; backtrace
-# continue to catch ; backtrace
-# continue to throw out of main
-#
-# The problem is that "re-throw" does not show a throw; only a catch.
-# I do not know if this is because of a bug, or because the generated
-# code is optimized for a throw into the same function.
-#
-# -- chastain 2004-01-09
+# Continue to breakpoint on catcher.
+gdb_test "continue" ".*catcher \\(x=13\\).*" "continue to catcher for the second time"
+
+
+# Continue to the re-throw.
+
+gdb_test "continue" "Catchpoint \[0-9\]+.*exception rethrown.*" \
+ "continue to rethrow"