-# Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# Copyright 2003-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
-#
+#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
-#
+#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
# (involving templates, in particular) where this problem triggers
# because GDB and GCC have different ideas what a class is called.
-if $tracelevel then {
- strace $tracelevel
- }
-
if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
#
# test running programs
#
-set prms_id 0
-set bug_id 0
-set testfile "rtti"
-set srcfile1 "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}1.cc"
-set objfile1 "${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}1.o"
-set srcfile2 "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}2.cc"
-set objfile2 "${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}2.o"
-set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
-
-# gdb_get_line_number needs this to be called srcfile.
-set srcfile "${srcfile1}"
-
-if { [gdb_compile "${srcfile1}" "${objfile1}" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
- gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
-}
+standard_testfile rtti1.cc rtti2.cc
-if { [gdb_compile "${srcfile2}" "${objfile2}" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
- gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
-}
-
-if { [gdb_compile "${objfile1} ${objfile2}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
- gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
+if [get_compiler_info "c++"] {
+ return -1
}
-if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
+if {[prepare_for_testing $testfile.exp $testfile \
+ [list $srcfile $srcfile2] {debug c++}]} {
return -1
}
-gdb_exit
-gdb_start
-gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
-gdb_load ${binfile}
-
-
if ![runto_main] then {
perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
continue
# First, run to after we've constructed the object:
-gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "constructs-done"]
-gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors"
+gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "main-constructs-done" "$srcfile"]
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in main"
gdb_test_multiple "print *e1" "print *e1" {
+ -re "warning: RTTI symbol not found for class 'n1::D1'.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ # gdb HEAD 2003-12-05
+ kfail "gdb/488" "print *e1"
+ }
-re "warning: can't find class named `n1::D1', as given by C\\+\\+ RTTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ # gdb 6.0
kfail "gdb/488" "print *e1"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n1::Base1> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
}
}
-# NOTE: carlton/2003-05-16: This test fails on my branch with an
-# "<incomplete type>" message because, within rtt1.cc, GDB has no way
-# of knowing that the class is called 'n2::D2' instead of just 'D2'.
-# This is an artifical test case, though: if we were using these
-# classes in a more substantial way, G++ would emit more debug info.
-# As is, I don't think there's anything that GDB can do about this
-# case until G++ starts emitting DW_TAG_namespace info; when that part
-# of the branch gets merged in, then we'll probably want to convert
-# that fail branch to an xfail.
+# NOTE: carlton/2004-01-14: This test with an "<incomplete type>"
+# message because, within rtt1.cc, GDB has no way of knowing that the
+# class is called 'n2::D2' instead of just 'D2'. This is an artifical
+# test case, though: if we were using these classes in a more
+# substantial way, G++ would emit more debug info. As is, I don't
+# think there's anything that GDB can do about this case until G++
+# starts emitting DW_TAG_namespace info; this should arrive with GCC
+# 3.4.
gdb_test_multiple "print *e2" "print *e2" {
+ -re "warning: RTTI symbol not found for class 'n2::D2'.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ # gdb HEAD 2003-12-05
+ kfail "gdb/488" "print *e2"
+ }
-re "warning: can't find class named `n2::D2', as given by C\\+\\+ RTTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ # gdb 6.0
kfail "gdb/488" "print *e2"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = <incomplete type>\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
- # See above NOTE.
- fail "print *e2"
+ kfail "gdb/1511" "print *e2"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::Base2> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "print *e2"
}
}
+# Now we test the hack that's been implemented to get around some
+# instances of PR gdb/1511.
+
+gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "func-constructs-done" "$srcfile"]
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in func"
+
+gdb_test "print *obj" "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::Base2> = .*}"
+
+gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "func3-constructs-done" "$srcfile"]
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in func3"
+
+gdb_test "print *obj3" "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::C2> = .*}"
+
gdb_exit
return 0