Fix gdb.multi/base.exp failures.
authorDoug Evans <dje@google.com>
Tue, 20 May 2014 20:06:26 +0000 (13:06 -0700)
committerDoug Evans <dje@google.com>
Tue, 20 May 2014 20:06:26 +0000 (13:06 -0700)
commit227533ac014354eaba944795cf8ff9cb3a31d330
tree110b109b020e820371df7da3c1b21606667e111e
parent39128ec026ca07a3a1cf2c2096afb3f17fa1d5d8
Fix gdb.multi/base.exp failures.

UNRESOLVED: gdb.multi/base.exp: remove-inferiors 2-3
UNRESOLVED: gdb.multi/base.exp: check remove-inferiors

gdb is crashing because it's accessing/freeing already freed memory.

==16368== Invalid read of size 4
==16368==    at 0x660A9D: find_pc_section (binutils-gdb/gdb/objfiles.c:1349)
==16368==    by 0x663ECB: lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc_section (binutils-gdb/gdb/minsyms.c:734)
==16368==    by 0x5D987A: find_pc_sect_symtab (binutils-gdb/gdb/symtab.c:2153)
==16368==    by 0x5D4D77: blockvector_for_pc_sect (binutils-gdb/gdb/block.c:168)
==16368==    by 0x5D4F59: block_for_pc_sect (binutils-gdb/gdb/block.c:246)
==16368==    by 0x5D4F9B: block_for_pc (binutils-gdb/gdb/block.c:258)
==16368==    by 0x734C5D: inline_frame_sniffer (binutils-gdb/gdb/inline-frame.c:218)
==16368==    by 0x732104: frame_unwind_try_unwinder (binutils-gdb/gdb/frame-unwind.c:108)
==16368==    by 0x73223F: frame_unwind_find_by_frame (binutils-gdb/gdb/frame-unwind.c:159)
==16368==    by 0x72D5AA: compute_frame_id (binutils-gdb/gdb/frame.c:453)
==16368==    by 0x7300EC: get_prev_frame_if_no_cycle (binutils-gdb/gdb/frame.c:1758)
==16368==    by 0x73079A: get_prev_frame_always (binutils-gdb/gdb/frame.c:1931)
==16368==  Address 0x5b13500 is 16 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd
==16368==    at 0x403072E: free (valgrind/coregrind/m_replacemalloc/vg_replace_malloc.c:445)
==16368==    by 0x762134: xfree (binutils-gdb/gdb/common/common-utils.c:108)
==16368==    by 0x65DACF: objfiles_pspace_data_cleanup (binutils-gdb/gdb/objfiles.c:91)
==16368==    by 0x75E546: program_spaceregistry_callback_adaptor (binutils-gdb/gdb/progspace.c:45)
==16368==    by 0x7644F6: registry_clear_data (binutils-gdb/gdb/registry.c:82)
==16368==    by 0x7645AB: registry_container_free_data (binutils-gdb/gdb/registry.c:95)
==16368==    by 0x75E5B4: program_space_free_data (binutils-gdb/gdb/progspace.c:45)
==16368==    by 0x75E9BA: release_program_space (binutils-gdb/gdb/progspace.c:167)
==16368==    by 0x75EB9B: prune_program_spaces (binutils-gdb/gdb/progspace.c:269)
==16368==    by 0x75303D: remove_inferior_command (binutils-gdb/gdb/inferior.c:792)
==16368==    by 0x50B5FD: do_cfunc (binutils-gdb/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:107)
==16368==    by 0x50E6F2: cmd_func (binutils-gdb/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:1886)

The problem originates from the get_current_arch call in
py-progspace.c:py_free_pspace.  The inferior associated with the
pspace is gone, and the current inferior is a different one and is running.
Therefore get_current_arch tries to read the current frame which
causes reads of data in the current program space which we've just deleted.

* python/py-progspace.c (py_free_pspace): Call target_gdbarch
instead of get_current_arch.
gdb/ChangeLog
gdb/python/py-progspace.c
This page took 0.025089 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.