tick: Fix spelling mistake in tick_handle_periodic()
authorViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:39:18 +0000 (16:09 +0530)
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tue, 25 Mar 2014 23:56:49 +0000 (00:56 +0100)
One of the comments in tick_handle_periodic() had 'when' instead of 'which' (My
guess :)). Fix it.

Also fix spelling mistake in 'Possible'.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: skarafotis@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2b29ca4230c163e44179941d7c7a16c1474385c2.1395743878.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
kernel/time/tick-common.c

index 20b2fe37d1053a21b138dbb2a7856e574c2ea9aa..0fec63414fb61387604f4a6f4580556f0d2eabf4 100644 (file)
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev)
                 * to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource.
                 * Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite
                 * loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies,
-                * when then will increment time, posibly causing
+                * which then will increment time, possibly causing
                 * the loop to trigger again and again.
                 */
                if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres())
This page took 0.050023 seconds and 5 git commands to generate.