From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:27:57 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: intel_mid_battery: Fix the argument order to intel_scu_ipc_command
X-Git-Url: http://drtracing.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=08a9e07e3fcfcd8df23b57edef8c6876f51020a1;p=deliverable%2Flinux.git

intel_mid_battery: Fix the argument order to intel_scu_ipc_command

The arguments to intel_scu_ipc_command are "command, subcommand"
the battery driver got this the wrong way around.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/power/intel_mid_battery.c b/drivers/power/intel_mid_battery.c
index 46730f579d7f..6430a7bb637b 100644
--- a/drivers/power/intel_mid_battery.c
+++ b/drivers/power/intel_mid_battery.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ struct battery_property {
  */
 static int pmic_scu_ipc_battery_cc_read(u32 *value)
 {
-	return intel_scu_ipc_command(IPC_CMD_CC_RD, IPCMSG_BATTERY,
+	return intel_scu_ipc_command(IPCMSG_BATTERY, IPC_CMD_CC_RD,
 					NULL, 0, value, 1);
 }