From: Ilpo Järvinen Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:17:05 +0000 (-0800) Subject: [TCP]: Correct DSACK check placing X-Git-Url: http://drtracing.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=20de20beba6e9bd2e1c83696bfefa3b16cda9a74;p=deliverable%2Flinux.git [TCP]: Correct DSACK check placing Previously one of the in-block skip branches was missing it. Also, drop it from tail-fully-processed case because the next iteration will do exactly the same thing, i.e., process the SACK block that contains the DSACK information. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 3ad6a19ad30f..79996b16b942 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -1554,20 +1554,15 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_ } /* Rest of the block already fully processed? */ - if (!after(end_seq, cache->end_seq)) { - skb = tcp_maybe_skipping_dsack(skb, sk, next_dup, cache->end_seq, - &fack_count, &reord, &flag); + if (!after(end_seq, cache->end_seq)) goto advance_sp; - } + + skb = tcp_maybe_skipping_dsack(skb, sk, next_dup, cache->end_seq, + &fack_count, &reord, &flag); /* ...tail remains todo... */ if (TCP_SKB_CB(tp->highest_sack)->end_seq == cache->end_seq) { - /* ...but better entrypoint exists! Check that DSACKs are - * properly accounted while skipping here - */ - tcp_maybe_skipping_dsack(skb, sk, next_dup, cache->end_seq, - &fack_count, &reord, &flag); - + /* ...but better entrypoint exists! */ skb = tcp_write_queue_next(sk, tp->highest_sack); fack_count = tp->fackets_out; cache++;