From: Alexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 21:27:24 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Btrfs: merge inode_list in __merge_refs
X-Git-Url: http://drtracing.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3ef5969cd8a42a78ccdbc53f7abb2e6136b2ec65;p=deliverable%2Flinux.git

Btrfs: merge inode_list in __merge_refs

When __merge_refs merges two refs, it is also needed to merge the
inode_list of both refs. Otherwise we have missed backrefs and memory
leaks. This happens for example if two inodes share an extent and
both lie in the same leaf and thus also have the same parent.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
---

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index a3219523ebc9..04edf69be875 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ static int __merge_refs(struct list_head *head, int mode)
 		     pos2 = n2, n2 = pos2->next) {
 			struct __prelim_ref *ref2;
 			struct __prelim_ref *xchg;
+			struct extent_inode_elem *eie;
 
 			ref2 = list_entry(pos2, struct __prelim_ref, list);
 
@@ -472,12 +473,20 @@ static int __merge_refs(struct list_head *head, int mode)
 					ref1 = ref2;
 					ref2 = xchg;
 				}
-				ref1->count += ref2->count;
 			} else {
 				if (ref1->parent != ref2->parent)
 					continue;
-				ref1->count += ref2->count;
 			}
+
+			eie = ref1->inode_list;
+			while (eie && eie->next)
+				eie = eie->next;
+			if (eie)
+				eie->next = ref2->inode_list;
+			else
+				ref1->inode_list = ref2->inode_list;
+			ref1->count += ref2->count;
+
 			list_del(&ref2->list);
 			kfree(ref2);
 		}