From: Môshe van der Sterre Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:07:03 +0000 (+0000) Subject: x86/efi/bgrt: Don't ignore the BGRT if the 'valid' bit is 0 X-Git-Url: http://drtracing.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=66dbe99cfe30e113d2e571e68b9b6a1a8985a157;p=deliverable%2Flinux.git x86/efi/bgrt: Don't ignore the BGRT if the 'valid' bit is 0 Unintuitively, the BGRT graphic is apparently meant to be usable if the valid bit in not set. The valid bit only conveys uncertainty about the validity in relation to the screen state. Windows 10 actually uses the BGRT image for its boot screen even if not 'valid', for example when the user triggered the boot menu. Because it is unclear if all firmwares will provide a usable graphic in this case, we now look at the BMP magic number as an additional check. Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett Signed-off-by: Môshe van der Sterre Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming Cc: =?UTF-8?q?M=C3=B4she=20van=20der=20Sterre?= Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454364428-494-10-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c index b0970661870a..a2433817c987 100644 --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c @@ -57,11 +57,6 @@ void __init efi_bgrt_init(void) bgrt_tab->status); return; } - if (bgrt_tab->status != 1) { - pr_debug("Ignoring BGRT: invalid status %u (expected 1)\n", - bgrt_tab->status); - return; - } if (bgrt_tab->image_type != 0) { pr_err("Ignoring BGRT: invalid image type %u (expected 0)\n", bgrt_tab->image_type); @@ -80,6 +75,11 @@ void __init efi_bgrt_init(void) memcpy(&bmp_header, image, sizeof(bmp_header)); memunmap(image); + if (bmp_header.id != 0x4d42) { + pr_err("Ignoring BGRT: Incorrect BMP magic number 0x%x (expected 0x4d42)\n", + bmp_header.id); + return; + } bgrt_image_size = bmp_header.size; bgrt_image = kmalloc(bgrt_image_size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);