From: Jeff Layton Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 01:44:01 +0000 (-0500) Subject: locks: update comments that refer to inode->i_flock X-Git-Url: http://drtracing.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8116bf4cb62d337c953cfa5369ef4cf83e73140c;p=deliverable%2Flinux.git locks: update comments that refer to inode->i_flock Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 2fc36b3772a0..4d0d41163a50 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -2212,7 +2212,7 @@ again: */ /* * we need that spin_lock here - it prevents reordering between - * update of inode->i_flock and check for it done in close(). + * update of i_flctx->flc_posix and check for it done in close(). * rcu_read_lock() wouldn't do. */ spin_lock(¤t->files->file_lock); diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index f87cb2f03103..ddd2fa7cefd3 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -925,12 +925,11 @@ int locks_in_grace(struct net *); * FIXME: should we create a separate "struct lock_request" to help distinguish * these two uses? * - * The i_flock list is ordered by: + * The varous i_flctx lists are ordered by: * - * 1) lock type -- FL_LEASEs first, then FL_FLOCK, and finally FL_POSIX - * 2) lock owner - * 3) lock range start - * 4) lock range end + * 1) lock owner + * 2) lock range start + * 3) lock range end * * Obviously, the last two criteria only matter for POSIX locks. */ @@ -1992,8 +1991,9 @@ static inline int break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode) { /* * Since this check is lockless, we must ensure that any refcounts - * taken are done before checking inode->i_flock. Otherwise, we could - * end up racing with tasks trying to set a new lease on this file. + * taken are done before checking i_flctx->flc_lease. Otherwise, we + * could end up racing with tasks trying to set a new lease on this + * file. */ smp_mb(); if (inode->i_flctx && !list_empty_careful(&inode->i_flctx->flc_lease)) @@ -2005,8 +2005,9 @@ static inline int break_deleg(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode) { /* * Since this check is lockless, we must ensure that any refcounts - * taken are done before checking inode->i_flock. Otherwise, we could - * end up racing with tasks trying to set a new lease on this file. + * taken are done before checking i_flctx->flc_lease. Otherwise, we + * could end up racing with tasks trying to set a new lease on this + * file. */ smp_mb(); if (inode->i_flctx && !list_empty_careful(&inode->i_flctx->flc_lease))