From 82072c4fcf095ce03a05860365c157c8bb58945b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Mc Guire Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 18:12:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Change function declaration to bool rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() is declared int. The current declaration was introduced in commit c0f4dfd4f90f (rcu: Make RCU_FAST_NO_HZ take advantage of numbered callbacks). But it is actually returning bool and as the function description states " * Return true if the specified CPU has any callback....", this probably should be a bool as all (3) call-sites currently treat it as bool. Type-checking coccinelle spatches are being used to locate type mismatches between function signatures and return values in this case this produced: ./kernel/rcu/tree.c:3538 WARNING: return of wrong type int != bool, Patch was compile tested with x86_64_defconfig (implies CONFIG_TREE_RCU=y) Patch is against 4.1-rc3 (localversion-next is -next-20150511) and fixes Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index 6efb0b66a30d..7b9dd4f62569 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -3496,7 +3496,7 @@ static int rcu_pending(void) * non-NULL, store an indication of whether all callbacks are lazy. * (If there are no callbacks, all of them are deemed to be lazy.) */ -static int __maybe_unused rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(bool *all_lazy) +static bool __maybe_unused rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(bool *all_lazy) { bool al = true; bool hc = false; -- 2.34.1