From 0a2db49dc4fe2873f857617d320c37b6bfe40255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:44:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] x86: uv: Use irq_alloc/free_hwirq() No functional change. The request to allocate the irq above NR_IRQS_LEGACY is completely pointless as the implementation enforces that the dynamic allocations are above the GSI interrupts, which includes the legacy PIT irqs. This does not replace the requirement to move x86 to irq domains, but it limits the mess to some degree. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Grant Likely Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: x86@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140507154335.252789823@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c index acf7752da952..b233681af4de 100644 --- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c +++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c @@ -238,11 +238,9 @@ uv_set_irq_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *mask, int uv_setup_irq(char *irq_name, int cpu, int mmr_blade, unsigned long mmr_offset, int limit) { - int irq, ret; + int ret, irq = irq_alloc_hwirq(uv_blade_to_memory_nid(mmr_blade)); - irq = create_irq_nr(NR_IRQS_LEGACY, uv_blade_to_memory_nid(mmr_blade)); - - if (irq <= 0) + if (!irq) return -EBUSY; ret = arch_enable_uv_irq(irq_name, irq, cpu, mmr_blade, mmr_offset, @@ -250,7 +248,7 @@ int uv_setup_irq(char *irq_name, int cpu, int mmr_blade, if (ret == irq) uv_set_irq_2_mmr_info(irq, mmr_offset, mmr_blade); else - destroy_irq(irq); + irq_free_hwirq(irq); return ret; } @@ -285,6 +283,6 @@ void uv_teardown_irq(unsigned int irq) n = n->rb_right; } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uv_irq_lock, irqflags); - destroy_irq(irq); + irq_free_hwirq(irq); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_teardown_irq); -- 2.34.1