From 13e099d2f77e1da3e4046860c48d956588633613 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:34:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sched/debug: Fix printing large integers on 32-bit platforms Some numbers like nr_running and nr_uninterruptible are fundamentally unsigned since its impossible to have a negative amount of tasks, yet we still print them as signed to easily recognise the underflow condition. rq->nr_uninterruptible has 'special' accounting and can in fact very easily become negative on a per-cpu basis. It was noted that since the P() macro assumes things are long long and the promotion of unsigned 'int/long' to long long on 32bit doesn't sign extend we print silly large numbers instead of the easier to read signed numbers. Therefore extend the P() macro to not require the sign extention. Reported-by: Diwakar Tundlam Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-gk5tm8t2n4ix2vkpns42uqqp@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/debug.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c index 31e4f61a1629..6f79596e0ea9 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c @@ -260,8 +260,14 @@ static void print_cpu(struct seq_file *m, int cpu) SEQ_printf(m, "\ncpu#%d\n", cpu); #endif -#define P(x) \ - SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld\n", #x, (long long)(rq->x)) +#define P(x) \ +do { \ + if (sizeof(rq->x) == 4) \ + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", #x, (long)(rq->x)); \ + else \ + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld\n", #x, (long long)(rq->x));\ +} while (0) + #define PN(x) \ SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %Ld.%06ld\n", #x, SPLIT_NS(rq->x)) -- 2.34.1