From 34e41e637a9134fd5d3fa00eefe4b42428e7ddc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Blandy Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:11:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2006-02-13 Jim Blandy * gdb.base/scope.exp (test_at_main): Remove logic to handle the case where it takes two "next" commands to skip past the init call. --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/scope.exp | 22 ++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog index 2747510dfd..ee17900db2 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2006-02-13 Jim Blandy + + * gdb.base/scope.exp (test_at_main): Remove logic to handle the + case where it takes two "next" commands to skip past the init + call. + 2006-02-12 Fred Fish * gdb.base/scope.exp (test_at_main): Use gdb_test_multiple diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/scope.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/scope.exp index 49386d2899..a9f8deaf09 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/scope.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/scope.exp @@ -61,22 +61,12 @@ proc test_at_main {} { global subdir global hp_cc_compiler - # skip past init. There may be a call to __main at the start of - # main, so the first next may only get us to the init0 call. - gdb_test_multiple "next" "next over init0() in main" { - -re "$decimal.*foo \\(\\).*$gdb_prompt $" { - pass "next over init0() in main" - } - -re "$decimal.*init0 \\(\\).*$gdb_prompt $" { - send_gdb "next\n" - exp_continue - } - -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { - fail "next over init0() in main" - gdb_suppress_tests - } - } - + # skip past init0. + # This used to do an extra "next" if the first one didn't get us + # over the call to init0, to handle calls to __main in the + # prologue, etc. But if a breakpoint at main doesn't leave us on + # the first line of real code in the function, that's a GDB bug. + gdb_test "next" "$decimal.*foo \\(\\);" "next over init0() in main" # Print scope0.c::filelocal, which is 1 -- 2.34.1