From 64372501e2af9b11e2ffd1ff79345dc4b1abe539 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 14:24:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fs/file_table.c:fput(): add comment

A missed update to "fput: task_work_add() can fail if the caller has
passed exit_task_work()".

Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/file_table.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/file_table.c b/fs/file_table.c
index 08e719b884ca..b9a77ad08b4d 100644
--- a/fs/file_table.c
+++ b/fs/file_table.c
@@ -313,6 +313,12 @@ void fput(struct file *file)
 			init_task_work(&file->f_u.fu_rcuhead, ____fput);
 			if (!task_work_add(task, &file->f_u.fu_rcuhead, true))
 				return;
+			/*
+			 * After this task has run exit_task_work(),
+			 * task_work_add() will fail.  free_ipc_ns()->
+			 * shm_destroy() can do this.  Fall through to delayed
+			 * fput to avoid leaking *file.
+			 */
 		}
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&delayed_fput_lock, flags);
 		list_add(&file->f_u.fu_list, &delayed_fput_list);
-- 
2.34.1