From 6e9e16e6143b725662e47026a1d0f270721cdd24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:11:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ipv6: replacing a rt6_info needs to purge possible propagated rt6_infos too Lubomir Rintel reported that during replacing a route the interface reference counter isn't correctly decremented. To quote bug : | [root@rhel7-5 lkundrak]# sh -x lal | + ip link add dev0 type dummy | + ip link set dev0 up | + ip link add dev1 type dummy | + ip link set dev1 up | + ip addr add 2001:db8:8086::2/64 dev dev0 | + ip route add 2001:db8:8086::/48 dev dev0 proto static metric 20 | + ip route add 2001:db8:8088::/48 dev dev1 proto static metric 10 | + ip route replace 2001:db8:8086::/48 dev dev1 proto static metric 20 | + ip link del dev0 type dummy | Message from syslogd@rhel7-5 at Jan 23 10:54:41 ... | kernel:unregister_netdevice: waiting for dev0 to become free. Usage count = 2 | | Message from syslogd@rhel7-5 at Jan 23 10:54:51 ... | kernel:unregister_netdevice: waiting for dev0 to become free. Usage count = 2 During replacement of a rt6_info we must walk all parent nodes and check if the to be replaced rt6_info got propagated. If so, replace it with an alive one. Fixes: 4a287eba2de3957 ("IPv6 routing, NLM_F_* flag support: REPLACE and EXCL flags support, warn about missing CREATE flag") Reported-by: Lubomir Rintel Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa Tested-by: Lubomir Rintel Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c index b2d1838897c9..f1c6d5e98322 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c @@ -659,6 +659,29 @@ static int fib6_commit_metrics(struct dst_entry *dst, return 0; } +static void fib6_purge_rt(struct rt6_info *rt, struct fib6_node *fn, + struct net *net) +{ + if (atomic_read(&rt->rt6i_ref) != 1) { + /* This route is used as dummy address holder in some split + * nodes. It is not leaked, but it still holds other resources, + * which must be released in time. So, scan ascendant nodes + * and replace dummy references to this route with references + * to still alive ones. + */ + while (fn) { + if (!(fn->fn_flags & RTN_RTINFO) && fn->leaf == rt) { + fn->leaf = fib6_find_prefix(net, fn); + atomic_inc(&fn->leaf->rt6i_ref); + rt6_release(rt); + } + fn = fn->parent; + } + /* No more references are possible at this point. */ + BUG_ON(atomic_read(&rt->rt6i_ref) != 1); + } +} + /* * Insert routing information in a node. */ @@ -807,11 +830,12 @@ add: rt->dst.rt6_next = iter->dst.rt6_next; atomic_inc(&rt->rt6i_ref); inet6_rt_notify(RTM_NEWROUTE, rt, info); - rt6_release(iter); if (!(fn->fn_flags & RTN_RTINFO)) { info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_route_nodes++; fn->fn_flags |= RTN_RTINFO; } + fib6_purge_rt(iter, fn, info->nl_net); + rt6_release(iter); } return 0; @@ -1322,24 +1346,7 @@ static void fib6_del_route(struct fib6_node *fn, struct rt6_info **rtp, fn = fib6_repair_tree(net, fn); } - if (atomic_read(&rt->rt6i_ref) != 1) { - /* This route is used as dummy address holder in some split - * nodes. It is not leaked, but it still holds other resources, - * which must be released in time. So, scan ascendant nodes - * and replace dummy references to this route with references - * to still alive ones. - */ - while (fn) { - if (!(fn->fn_flags & RTN_RTINFO) && fn->leaf == rt) { - fn->leaf = fib6_find_prefix(net, fn); - atomic_inc(&fn->leaf->rt6i_ref); - rt6_release(rt); - } - fn = fn->parent; - } - /* No more references are possible at this point. */ - BUG_ON(atomic_read(&rt->rt6i_ref) != 1); - } + fib6_purge_rt(rt, fn, net); inet6_rt_notify(RTM_DELROUTE, rt, info); rt6_release(rt); -- 2.34.1