From 7139178e9baf44dab454b757ed91a9ee149ad0f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jouni Hogander Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:59:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] OMAP3: PM: Use pwrdm_set_next_pwrst instead of set_pwrdm_state in idle loop It is more efficient to use pwrdm_set_next_pwrst for mpu, core and neon instead of set_pwrdm_state in idle loop. It is anyway known that those are active in idle loop. So no need to use set_pwrdm_state. Signed-off-by: Jouni Hogander Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 4 ++-- arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c index 5128b8c26b09..1d10c4aa9352 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c @@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ static int omap3_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev, core_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET; } - set_pwrdm_state(mpu_pd, mpu_state); - set_pwrdm_state(core_pd, core_state); + pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pd, mpu_state); + pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(core_pd, core_state); if (omap_irq_pending()) goto return_sleep_time; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c index 501b00100d59..c77f6db8a63d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void) /* NEON control */ if (pwrdm_read_pwrst(neon_pwrdm) == PWRDM_POWER_ON) - set_pwrdm_state(neon_pwrdm, mpu_next_state); + pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(neon_pwrdm, mpu_next_state); /* PER */ per_next_state = pwrdm_read_next_pwrst(per_pwrdm); -- 2.34.1