From 78c89ba121221d9224a5747803d7fffe51cd6e44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:22:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Remove parent recording in latency tracer graph options Even though the parent is recorded with the normal function tracing of the latency tracers (irqsoff and wakeup), the function graph recording is bogus. This is due to the function graph messing with the return stack. The latency tracers pass in as the parent CALLER_ADDR0, which works fine for plain function tracing. But this causes bogus output with the graph tracer: 3) -0 | d.s3. 0.000 us | return_to_handler(); 3) -0 | d.s3. 0.000 us | _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(); 3) -0 | d.s3. 0.000 us | return_to_handler(); 3) -0 | d.s3. 0.000 us | trace_hardirqs_on(); The "return_to_handle()" call is the trampoline of the function graph tracer, and is meaningless in this context. Cc: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c index 6f8fe28acba1..76b05980225c 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c @@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ trace_graph_function(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip, unsigned long flags, int pc) { - __trace_graph_function(tr, parent_ip, flags, pc); __trace_graph_function(tr, ip, flags, pc); } -- 2.34.1