From adcba1e3a5d97d93f2277bcf38ae1eb2c91fc840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jingoo Han Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:31:24 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] pwm: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf() For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf(). Also, the following checkpatch warning is fixed. WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding --- drivers/pwm/core.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c index 2ca95042a0b9..a80471399c20 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c @@ -808,12 +808,12 @@ static void pwm_dbg_show(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct seq_file *s) seq_printf(s, " pwm-%-3d (%-20.20s):", i, pwm->label); if (test_bit(PWMF_REQUESTED, &pwm->flags)) - seq_printf(s, " requested"); + seq_puts(s, " requested"); if (test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags)) - seq_printf(s, " enabled"); + seq_puts(s, " enabled"); - seq_printf(s, "\n"); + seq_puts(s, "\n"); } } -- 2.34.1