From af3a4a9bbeb00df3e42e77240b4cdac5479812f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?David=20H=C3=A4rdeman?= Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 20:31:51 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] [media] dib0700: NEC scancode cleanup MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit the RC RX packet is defined as: struct dib0700_rc_response { ... u8 not_system; u8 system; ... u8 data; u8 not_data; The NEC protocol transmits in the order: system not_system data not_data Note that the code defines the NEC extended scancode as: scancode = be16_to_cpu(poll_reply->system16) << 8 | poll_reply->data; i.e. scancode = poll_reply->not_system << 16 | poll_reply->system << 8 | poll_reply->data; Which, if the order *is* reversed, would mean that the scancode that gets defined is in reality: scancode = poll_reply->system << 16 | poll_reply->not_system << 8 | poll_reply->data; Which is the same as the order used in drivers/media/rc/ir-nec-decoder.c. This patch changes the code to match my assumption (the generated scancode should, however, not change). [m.chehab@samsung.com: rebased and fixed the decoding error message] Signed-off-by: David Härdeman CC: Patrick Boettcher Tested-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c | 36 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c index c14285fa8271..38b151f7ceac 100644 --- a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c +++ b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dib0700_core.c @@ -658,13 +658,8 @@ out: struct dib0700_rc_response { u8 report_id; u8 data_state; - union { - u16 system16; - struct { - u8 not_system; - u8 system; - }; - }; + u8 system; + u8 not_system; u8 data; u8 not_data; }; @@ -710,20 +705,29 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(struct urb *purb) toggle = 0; /* NEC protocol sends repeat code as 0 0 0 FF */ - if ((poll_reply->system == 0x00) && (poll_reply->data == 0x00) - && (poll_reply->not_data == 0xff)) { + if (poll_reply->system == 0x00 && + poll_reply->not_system == 0x00 && + poll_reply->data == 0x00 && + poll_reply->not_data == 0xff) { poll_reply->data_state = 2; break; } - if ((poll_reply->system ^ poll_reply->not_system) != 0xff) { + if ((poll_reply->data ^ poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) { + deb_data("NEC32 protocol\n"); + keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC32(poll_reply->system << 24 | + poll_reply->not_system << 16 | + poll_reply->data << 8 | + poll_reply->not_data); + } else if ((poll_reply->system ^ poll_reply->not_system) != 0xff) { deb_data("NEC extended protocol\n"); - /* NEC extended code - 24 bits */ - keycode = be16_to_cpu(poll_reply->system16) << 8 | poll_reply->data; + keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NECX(poll_reply->system << 8 | + poll_reply->not_system, + poll_reply->data); } else { deb_data("NEC normal protocol\n"); - /* normal NEC code - 16 bits */ - keycode = poll_reply->system << 8 | poll_reply->data; + keycode = RC_SCANCODE_NEC(poll_reply->system, + poll_reply->data); } break; @@ -738,8 +742,8 @@ static void dib0700_rc_urb_completion(struct urb *purb) if ((poll_reply->data + poll_reply->not_data) != 0xff) { /* Key failed integrity check */ - err("key failed integrity check: %04x %02x %02x", - poll_reply->system, + err("key failed integrity check: %02x %02x %02x %02x", + poll_reply->system, poll_reply->not_system, poll_reply->data, poll_reply->not_data); goto resubmit; } -- 2.34.1