From b2dae948d7732d6eeb3efeda08f9ed349b82a383 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Doug Evans Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:19:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * gdb.cp/m-static.exp: Update expected test output. --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog index 3aef963d1e..92adac6ab5 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2010-06-27 Doug Evans + + * gdb.cp/m-static.exp: Update expected test output. + 2010-06-25 Paul Hilfinger * gdb.gdb/selftest.exp: Adjust expected message for diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp index 7d82d29e1f..dda8d844e9 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.exp @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ gdb_test "print test3.data.value_derived" "\\$\[0-9\].* = etruscan" "template ob gdb_test "print test4.elsewhere" "\\$\[0-9\].* = 221" "static const int initialized elsewhere" # static const int that nobody initializes. From PR gdb/635. -gdb_test "print test4.nowhere" "field nowhere is nonexistent or has been optimised out" "static const int initialized nowhere" +gdb_test "print test4.nowhere" "field nowhere is nonexistent or has been optimized out" "static const int initialized nowhere" # Perhaps at some point test4 should also include a test for a static # const int that was initialized in the header file. But I'm not sure -- 2.34.1